Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 27

1.

Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery.

McCahill LE, Single RM, Aiello Bowles EJ, Feigelson HS, James TA, Barney T, Engel JM, Onitilo AA.

JAMA. 2012 Feb 1;307(5):467-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.43.

PMID:
22298678
2.

Re-resection rates after breast-conserving surgery as a performance indicator: introduction of a case-mix model to allow comparison between Dutch hospitals.

Talsma AK, Reedijk AM, Damhuis RA, Westenend PJ, Vles WJ.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 Apr;37(4):357-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.01.008. Epub 2011 Feb 2.

PMID:
21292434
3.

Presence of an in situ component is associated with reduced biological aggressiveness of size-matched invasive breast cancer.

Wong H, Lau S, Yau T, Cheung P, Epstein RJ.

Br J Cancer. 2010 Apr 27;102(9):1391-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605655.

4.

Identifying co-morbidity in surgical patients using administrative data with the Royal College of Surgeons Charlson Score.

Armitage JN, van der Meulen JH; Royal College of Surgeons Co-morbidity Consensus Group.

Br J Surg. 2010 May;97(5):772-81. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6930.

PMID:
20306528
5.

Radiological and pathological size estimations of pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, specimen handling and the influence on the success of breast conservation surgery: a review of 2564 cases from the Sloane Project.

Thomas J, Evans A, Macartney J, Pinder SE, Hanby A, Ellis I, Kearins O, Roberts T, Clements K, Lawrence G, Bishop H; Sloane Project Steering Group.

Br J Cancer. 2010 Jan 19;102(2):285-93. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605513. Epub 2010 Jan 5.

6.

Impact of initial surgical margins and residual cancer upon re-excision on outcome of patients with localized breast cancer.

Kouzminova NB, Aggarwal S, Aggarwal A, Allo MD, Lin AY.

Am J Surg. 2009 Dec;198(6):771-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.05.027.

PMID:
19969128
8.

Obtaining adequate surgical margins in breast-conserving therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: current modalities and future directions.

Pleijhuis RG, Graafland M, de Vries J, Bart J, de Jong JS, van Dam GM.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Oct;16(10):2717-30. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0609-z. Epub 2009 Jul 17. Review.

9.

Surgical guidelines for the management of breast cancer.

Association of Breast Surgery at Baso 2009.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35 Suppl 1:1-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.01.008. Epub 2009 Mar 18. No abstract available.

PMID:
19299100
10.

Factors influencing cosmetic outcome in breast conservation.

Munshi A, Kakkar S, Bhutani R, Jalali R, Budrukkar A, Dinshaw KA.

Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2009 May;21(4):285-93. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2009.02.001. Epub 2009 Feb 27. Review.

PMID:
19249195
11.

Early and locally advanced breast cancer: diagnosis and treatment National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guideline 2009.

Yarnold J.

Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2009 Apr;21(3):159-60. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2008.12.008. Epub 2009 Jan 23. No abstract available.

PMID:
19167201
12.

Prevalence and predictive factors for the detection of carcinoma in cavity margin performed at the time of breast lumpectomy.

Tengher-Barna I, Hequet D, Reboul-Marty J, Frassati-Biaggi A, Seince N, Rodrigues-Faure A, Uzan M, Ziol M.

Mod Pathol. 2009 Feb;22(2):299-305. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2008.186. Epub 2008 Nov 7.

13.

Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision?

Jacobson AF, Asad J, Boolbol SK, Osborne MP, Boachie-Adjei K, Feldman SM.

Am J Surg. 2008 Oct;196(4):556-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.06.007.

PMID:
18809063
14.

Outcomes of multiple wire localization for larger breast cancers: when can mastectomy be avoided?

Kirstein LJ, Rafferty E, Specht MC, Moore RH, Taghian AG, Hughes KS, Gadd MA, Smith BL.

J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Sep;207(3):342-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.04.019. Epub 2008 Jun 2.

PMID:
18722938
15.

Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy.

Bani MR, Lux MP, Heusinger K, Wenkel E, Magener A, Schulz-Wendtland R, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 Jan;35(1):32-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.04.008. Epub 2008 Jun 9.

PMID:
18539425
16.

Mammographic bi-dimensional product: a powerful predictor of successful excision of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Evans A, Clements K, Maxwell A, Dobson H, Wallis M, Lawrence G, Bishop H, Sloane Project Steering Group.

Clin Radiol. 2007 Aug;62(8):787-91. Epub 2007 May 7.

PMID:
17604769
17.

Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006.

Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, Heanue M, Colombet M, Boyle P.

Ann Oncol. 2007 Mar;18(3):581-92. Epub 2007 Feb 7.

PMID:
17287242
19.

The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.

Aziz D, Rawlinson E, Narod SA, Sun P, Lickley HL, McCready DR, Holloway CM.

Breast J. 2006 Jul-Aug;12(4):331-7.

PMID:
16848842
20.

The consequence of multiple re-excisions to obtain clear lumpectomy margins in breast cancer patients.

Menes TS, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss I, Godbold JH, Estabrook A, Smith SR.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2005 Nov;12(11):881-5. Epub 2005 Oct 3.

PMID:
16195834

Supplemental Content

Support Center