Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 62

2.

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification compared to real-time PCR and enzyme immunoassay for toxigenic Clostridium difficile detection.

Boyanton BL Jr, Sural P, Loomis CR, Pesta C, Gonzalez-Krellwitz L, Robinson-Dunn B, Riska P.

J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Mar;50(3):640-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01014-11. Epub 2011 Dec 21.

4.

Detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A/B genes by multiplex real-time PCR for the diagnosis of C. difficile infection.

Kim H, Jeong SH, Kim M, Lee Y, Lee K.

J Med Microbiol. 2012 Feb;61(Pt 2):274-7. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.035618-0. Epub 2011 Sep 29.

PMID:
21959205
5.

Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in pediatric stool samples: an evaluation of Quik Check Complete Antigen assay, BD GeneOhm Cdiff PCR, and ProGastro Cd PCR assays.

Selvaraju SB, Gripka M, Estes K, Nguyen A, Jackson MA, Selvarangan R.

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 Nov;71(3):224-9. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.07.015. Epub 2011 Sep 6.

PMID:
21899975
6.

Diagnostic accuracy of real-time polymerase chain reaction in detection of Clostridium difficile in the stool samples of patients with suspected Clostridium difficile Infection: a meta-analysis.

Deshpande A, Pasupuleti V, Rolston DD, Jain A, Deshpande N, Pant C, Hernandez AV.

Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Oct;53(7):e81-90. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir505.

PMID:
21890762
7.

Clinical and infection control implications of Clostridium difficile infection with negative enzyme immunoassay for toxin.

Guerrero DM, Chou C, Jury LA, Nerandzic MM, Cadnum JC, Donskey CJ.

Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Aug 1;53(3):287-90. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir361.

PMID:
21765078
8.

Comparison of five assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin.

Chapin KC, Dickenson RA, Wu F, Andrea SB.

J Mol Diagn. 2011 Jul;13(4):395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2011.03.004. Epub 2011 Apr 29.

9.

Effective utilization of evolving methods for the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Kufelnicka AM, Kirn TJ.

Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Jun 15;52(12):1451-7. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir201. Review.

PMID:
21628487
10.

Evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections.

Lalande V, Barrault L, Wadel S, Eckert C, Petit JC, Barbut F.

J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Jul;49(7):2714-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01835-10. Epub 2011 Apr 27.

11.

Rapid diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by multiplex real-time PCR.

Barbut F, Monot M, Rousseau A, Cavelot S, Simon T, Burghoffer B, Lalande V, Tankovic J, Petit JC, Dupuy B, Eckert C.

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 Oct;30(10):1279-85. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1224-z. Epub 2011 Apr 13.

12.

Comparison of two commercial molecular tests for the detection of Clostridium difficile in the routine diagnostic laboratory.

Zidarič V, Kevorkijan BK, Oresic N, Janezic S, Rupnik M.

J Med Microbiol. 2011 Aug;60(Pt 8):1131-6. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.030163-0. Epub 2011 Mar 3.

PMID:
21372187
13.

Comparison of two commercial molecular assays to a laboratory-developed molecular assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Karre T, Sloan L, Patel R, Mandrekar J, Rosenblatt J.

J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Feb;49(2):725-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01028-10. Epub 2010 Dec 1.

14.

Rapid and sensitive loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for Clostridium difficile detection challenges cytotoxin B cell test and culture as gold standard.

Norén T, Alriksson I, Andersson J, Akerlund T, Unemo M.

J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Feb;49(2):710-1. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01824-10. Epub 2010 Nov 24.

15.

What is the current role of algorithmic approaches for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection?

Wilcox MH, Planche T, Fang FC, Gilligan P.

J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Dec;48(12):4347-53. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02028-10. Epub 2010 Oct 27.

16.

Comparison of real-time PCR techniques to cytotoxigenic culture methods for diagnosing Clostridium difficile infection.

Knetsch CW, Bakker D, de Boer RF, Sanders I, Hofs S, Kooistra-Smid AM, Corver J, Eastwood K, Wilcox MH, Kuijper EJ.

J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Jan;49(1):227-31. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01743-10. Epub 2010 Oct 27.

17.

Impact of strain type on detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of molecular diagnostic and enzyme immunoassay approaches.

Tenover FC, Novak-Weekley S, Woods CW, Peterson LR, Davis T, Schreckenberger P, Fang FC, Dascal A, Gerding DN, Nomura JH, Goering RV, Akerlund T, Weissfeld AS, Baron EJ, Wong E, Marlowe EM, Whitmore J, Persing DH.

J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Oct;48(10):3719-24. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00427-10. Epub 2010 Aug 11.

18.

Is repeat PCR needed for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection?

Luo RF, Banaei N.

J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Oct;48(10):3738-41. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00722-10. Epub 2010 Aug 4.

19.

Evaluation of a rapid molecular screening approach for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in general and subsequent identification of the tcdC Δ117 mutation in human stools.

de Boer RF, Wijma JJ, Schuurman T, Moedt J, Dijk-Alberts BG, Ott A, Kooistra-Smid AM, van Duynhoven YT.

J Microbiol Methods. 2010 Oct;83(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.07.017. Epub 2010 Jul 30.

PMID:
20674616
20.

Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA).

Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Kelly CP, Loo VG, McDonald LC, Pepin J, Wilcox MH; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 May;31(5):431-55. doi: 10.1086/651706.

PMID:
20307191

Supplemental Content

Support Center