Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 25

1.

Found in translation: cross-cultural consensus in the accurate categorization of male sexual orientation.

Rule NO, Ishii K, Ambady N, Rosen KS, Hallett KC.

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Nov;37(11):1499-507. doi: 10.1177/0146167211415630. Epub 2011 Aug 1.

PMID:
21807952
2.

Mating interest improves women's accuracy in judging male sexual orientation.

Rule NO, Rosen KS, Slepian ML, Ambady N.

Psychol Sci. 2011 Jul;22(7):881-6. doi: 10.1177/0956797611412394. Epub 2011 Jun 13.

PMID:
21670428
3.

Sexual orientation perception involves gendered facial cues.

Freeman JB, Johnson KL, Ambady N, Rule NO.

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Oct;36(10):1318-31. doi: 10.1177/0146167210378755. Epub 2010 Aug 3.

PMID:
20682754
4.

A power primer.

Cohen J.

Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9.

PMID:
19565683
5.

Ambiguous group membership is extracted automatically from faces.

Rule NO, Macrae CN, Ambady N.

Psychol Sci. 2009 Apr;20(4):441-3. No abstract available.

PMID:
19399971
6.

Accuracy and awareness in the perception and categorization of male sexual orientation.

Rule NO, Ambady N, Adams RB, Macrae CN.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Nov;95(5):1019-28. doi: 10.1037/a0013194.

PMID:
18954191
7.

Dissecting "gaydar": accuracy and the role of masculinity-femininity.

Rieger G, Linsenmeier JA, Gygax L, Garcia S, Bailey JM.

Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Feb;39(1):124-40. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9405-2. Epub 2008 Sep 23.

PMID:
18810629
8.

Configural information in gender categorisation.

Baudouin JY, Humphreys GW.

Perception. 2006;35(4):531-40.

PMID:
16700294
9.

Understanding others: the face and person construal.

Macrae CN, Quinn KA, Mason MF, Quadflieg S.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Nov;89(5):686-95.

PMID:
16351362
10.

The perceptual determinants of person construal: reopening the social-cognitive toolbox.

Cloutier J, Mason MF, Macrae CN.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Jun;88(6):885-94.

PMID:
15982111
11.

Sex differences in the flexibility of sexual orientation: a multidimensional retrospective assessment.

Kinnish KK, Strassberg DS, Turner CW.

Arch Sex Behav. 2005 Apr;34(2):173-83.

PMID:
15803251
12.

Sex differences in face gender recognition in humans.

Cellerino A, Borghetti D, Sartucci F.

Brain Res Bull. 2004 Jul 15;63(6):443-9.

PMID:
15249109
13.

The many faces of configural processing.

Maurer D, Grand RL, Mondloch CJ.

Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Jun 1;6(6):255-260.

PMID:
12039607
14.

Discrimination of spatial relations and features in faces: effects of inversion and viewing duration.

Barton JJ, Keenan JP, Bass T.

Br J Psychol. 2001 Aug;92(Pt 3):527-49.

PMID:
11534743
15.

Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces.

Leder H, Candrian G, Huber O, Bruce V.

Perception. 2001;30(1):73-83.

PMID:
11257979
16.

Revisiting the perception of upside-down faces.

Murray JE, Yong E, Rhodes G.

Psychol Sci. 2000 Nov;11(6):492-6.

PMID:
11202495
17.

When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition.

Leder H, Bruce V.

Q J Exp Psychol A. 2000 May;53(2):513-36.

PMID:
10881616
18.
19.

What is "special" about face perception?

Farah MJ, Wilson KD, Drain M, Tanaka JN.

Psychol Rev. 1998 Jul;105(3):482-98. Review.

PMID:
9697428
20.

What's lost in inverted faces?

Rhodes G, Brake S, Atkinson AP.

Cognition. 1993 Apr;47(1):25-57. Review.

PMID:
8482070

Supplemental Content

Support Center