Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 46


Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40 to 49 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nelson HD, Zakher B, Cantor A, Fu R, Griffin J, O'Meara ES, Buist DS, Kerlikowske K, van Ravesteyn NT, Trentham-Dietz A, Mandelblatt JS, Miglioretti DL.

Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 1;156(9):635-48. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-9-201205010-00006. Review.


Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study.

Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Lehman CD, Taplin SH, Sickles EA; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):493-502. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00005.


Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study.

Hubbard RA, Kerlikowske K, Flowers CI, Yankaskas BC, Zhu W, Miglioretti DL.

Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):481-92. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00004. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2014 May 6;160(9):658.


Prediction of higher mortality reduction for the UK Breast Screening Frequency Trial: a model-based approach on screening intervals.

van Ravesteyn NT, Heijnsdijk EA, Draisma G, de Koning HJ.

Br J Cancer. 2011 Sep 27;105(7):1082-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.300. Epub 2011 Aug 23.


Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.

Schousboe JT, Kerlikowske K, Loh A, Cummings SR.

Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 5;155(1):10-20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-1-201107050-00003.


Population-based mammography screening below age 50: balancing radiation-induced vs prevented breast cancer deaths.

de Gelder R, Draisma G, Heijnsdijk EA, de Koning HJ.

Br J Cancer. 2011 Mar 29;104(7):1214-20. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.67. Epub 2011 Mar 1.


Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening.

Yaffe MJ, Mainprize JG.

Radiology. 2011 Jan;258(1):98-105. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100655. Epub 2010 Nov 16. Erratum in: Radiology. 2012 Jul;264(1):306.


Screening for Breast Cancer: Systematic Evidence Review Update for the US Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].

Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos C, Chan B, Nygren P, Humphrey L.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2009 Nov.


Consequences of digital mammography in population-based breast cancer screening: initial changes and long-term impact on referral rates.

Bluekens AM, Karssemeijer N, Beijerinck D, Deurenberg JJ, van Engen RE, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ.

Eur Radiol. 2010 Sep;20(9):2067-73. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1786-7. Epub 2010 Apr 21.


Modelling the impact of changes in sensitivity on the outcomes of the UK breast screening programme.

Taylor P.

J Med Screen. 2010;17(1):31-6. doi: 10.1258/jms.2009.009048.


On mammography--more agreement than disagreement.

Partridge AH, Winer EP.

N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 24;361(26):2499-501. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0911288. Epub 2009 Nov 25. No abstract available.


Evidence-based breast cancer prevention: the importance of individual risk.

Kerlikowske K.

Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):750-2. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00012. No abstract available. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jan 19;152(2):136.


Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms.

Mandelblatt JS, Cronin KA, Bailey S, Berry DA, de Koning HJ, Draisma G, Huang H, Lee SJ, Munsell M, Plevritis SK, Ravdin P, Schechter CB, Sigal B, Stoto MA, Stout NK, van Ravesteyn NT, Venier J, Zelen M, Feuer EJ; Breast Cancer Working Group of the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network.

Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):738-47. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00010. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jan 19;152(2):136.


Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos C, Chan BK, Humphrey L; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):727-37, W237-42. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00009. Review.


Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

US Preventive Services Task Force.

Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):716-26, W-236. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00008. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2010 May 18;152(10):688. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Feb 2;152(3):199-200.


Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program.

Karssemeijer N, Bluekens AM, Beijerinck D, Deurenberg JJ, Beekman M, Visser R, van Engen R, Bartels-Kortland A, Broeders MJ.

Radiology. 2009 Nov;253(2):353-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2532090225. Epub 2009 Jul 31.


Breast cancer screening: evidence for false reassurance?

de Gelder R, van As E, Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Bartels CC, Boer R, Draisma G, de Koning HJ.

Int J Cancer. 2008 Aug 1;123(3):680-6. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23540.


Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model.

Tice JA, Cummings SR, Smith-Bindman R, Ichikawa L, Barlow WE, Kerlikowske K.

Ann Intern Med. 2008 Mar 4;148(5):337-47.


Effects of study methods and biases on estimates of invasive breast cancer overdetection with mammography screening: a systematic review.

Biesheuvel C, Barratt A, Howard K, Houssami N, Irwig L.

Lancet Oncol. 2007 Dec;8(12):1129-1138. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70380-7. Review.


Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age: a systematic review for the American College of Physicians.

Armstrong K, Moye E, Williams S, Berlin JA, Reynolds EE.

Ann Intern Med. 2007 Apr 3;146(7):516-26. Review.


Supplemental Content

Support Center