Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 15

1.

Robot-assisted staging using three robotic arms for endometrial cancer: comparison to laparoscopy and laparotomy at a single institution.

Jung YW, Lee DW, Kim SW, Nam EJ, Kim JH, Kim JW, Kim YT.

J Surg Oncol. 2010 Feb 1;101(2):116-21. doi: 10.1002/jso.21436.

PMID:
19902479
2.
3.

Robotic gynecologic surgery: past, present, and future.

Chen CC, Falcone T.

Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;52(3):335-43. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181b08adf. Review.

PMID:
19661749
4.

Laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without a robot: Stanford experience.

Nezhat C, Lavie O, Lemyre M, Gemer O, Bhagan L, Nezhat C.

JSLS. 2009 Apr-Jun;13(2):125-8.

5.

Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, van Voorst S, Mol BW, Kluivers KB.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;(3):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;8:CD003677.

PMID:
19588344
6.

Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?

Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Henretta MS, Kim KH, Carlson MJ, Phillips GS, Fowler JM.

Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Apr;113(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.12.005. Epub 2009 Jan 24.

PMID:
19168206
7.

Robotic surgery in gynecologic field.

Kim YT, Kim SW, Jung YW.

Yonsei Med J. 2008 Dec 31;49(6):886-90. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2008.49.6.886. Review.

8.

A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy.

Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN, Fowler WC.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Oct;199(4):360.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.012.

PMID:
18928974
9.

Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.

Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Suttle AW, Hunt S.

Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Dec;111(3):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.022. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

PMID:
18829091
10.

A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.

Payne TN, Dauterive FR.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):286-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 6.

PMID:
18439499
11.

[Da vinci robotic surgery in gynaecological oncology: a critical interim appraisal].

Bartos P, Struppl D, Trhlík M, Czudek S, Skrovina M, Adamcík L, Soumarová R.

Ceska Gynekol. 2007 Oct;72(5):354-9. Czech.

PMID:
18175521
12.

Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003.

Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG.

Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Nov;110(5):1091-5.

PMID:
17978124
13.

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: indications, techniques and outcomes.

Reich H.

Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;19(4):337-44. Review.

PMID:
17625415
14.
15.

Open laparoscopy.

Hasson HM.

Biomed Bull. 1984 Aug;5(1):1-6.

PMID:
12267024

Supplemental Content

Support Center