Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 23

1.

Static and mobile antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers for the management of prosthetic joint infection.

Jacobs C, Christensen CP, Berend ME.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009 Jun;17(6):356-68. Review.

PMID:
19474445
2.

Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. Surgical technique.

Meneghini RM, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Mar 1;91 Suppl 2 Pt 1:131-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01061.

PMID:
19255205
3.

Limitations of structural allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Bauman RD, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Mar;467(3):818-24. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0679-4. Epub 2009 Jan 7.

4.

Porous tantalum cones for large metaphyseal tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Long WJ, Scuderi GR.

J Arthroplasty. 2009 Oct;24(7):1086-92. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.08.011. Epub 2008 Sep 26.

PMID:
18823749
5.

Diagnosis of infected total knee: findings of a multicenter database.

Parvizi J, Ghanem E, Sharkey P, Aggarwal A, Burnett RS, Barrack RL.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Nov;466(11):2628-33. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0471-5. Epub 2008 Sep 10.

6.

Activation of human leukocytes on tantalum trabecular metal in comparison to commonly used orthopedic metal implant materials.

Schildhauer TA, Peter E, Muhr G, Köller M.

J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009 Feb;88(2):332-41. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31850.

PMID:
18286637
7.

Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement.

Meneghini RM, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jan;90(1):78-84. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01495.

PMID:
18171960
8.

Use of structural allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty in knees with severe tibial bone loss.

Engh GA, Ammeen DJ.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Dec;89(12):2640-7.

PMID:
18056496
9.

Primary human osteoblasts grow into porous tantalum and maintain an osteoblastic phenotype.

Welldon KJ, Atkins GJ, Howie DW, Findlay DM.

J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008 Mar 1;84(3):691-701.

PMID:
17635018
10.

Bacterial adherence to tantalum versus commonly used orthopedic metallic implant materials.

Schildhauer TA, Robie B, Muhr G, Köller M.

J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Jul;20(7):476-84.

PMID:
16891939
11.

Management of bone loss: structural grafts in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Backstein D, Safir O, Gross A.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 May;446:104-12.

PMID:
16672879
12.
13.

The proliferation and phenotypic expression of human osteoblasts on tantalum metal.

Findlay DM, Welldon K, Atkins GJ, Howie DW, Zannettino AC, Bobyn D.

Biomaterials. 2004 May;25(12):2215-27.

PMID:
14741587
14.

Morselized bone grafting of defects in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Benjamin J, Engh G, Parsley B, Donaldson T, Coon T.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Nov;(392):62-7.

PMID:
11716426
15.

The use of structural allograft for uncontained defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. A minimum five-year review.

Clatworthy MG, Ballance J, Brick GW, Chandler HP, Gross AE.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Mar;83-A(3):404-11.

PMID:
11263645
16.

Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial.

Bobyn JD, Stackpool GJ, Hacking SA, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 Sep;81(5):907-14.

17.
18.

The Coventry Award. The value of preoperative aspiration before total knee revision.

Barrack RL, Jennings RW, Wolfe MW, Bertot AJ.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Dec;(345):8-16.

PMID:
9418615
19.

Reconstruction of massive bone defects with allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Ghazavi MT, Stockley I, Yee G, Davis A, Gross AE.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Jan;79(1):17-25.

PMID:
9010182
20.

Aspiration of the knee joint before revision arthroplasty.

Duff GP, Lachiewicz PF, Kelley SS.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Oct;(331):132-9.

PMID:
8895629

Supplemental Content

Support Center