Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 26

1.

Five preference-based indexes in cataract and heart failure patients were not equally responsive to change.

Kaplan RM, Tally S, Hays RD, Feeny D, Ganiats TG, Palta M, Fryback DG.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 May;64(5):497-506. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.010. Epub 2010 Aug 4.

2.

Effect of preventive primary care outreach on health related quality of life among older adults at risk of functional decline: randomised controlled trial.

Ploeg J, Brazil K, Hutchison B, Kaczorowski J, Dalby DM, Goldsmith CH, Furlong W.

BMJ. 2010 Apr 16;340:c1480. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1480.

3.

Comparison of 5 health-related quality-of-life indexes using item response theory analysis.

Fryback DG, Palta M, Cherepanov D, Bolt D, Kim JS.

Med Decis Making. 2010 Jan-Feb;30(1):5-15. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09347016. Epub 2009 Oct 20.

4.

Three ways to quantify uncertainty in individually applied "minimally important change" values.

de Vet HC, Terluin B, Knol DL, Roorda LD, Mokkink LB, Ostelo RW, Hendriks EJ, Bouter LM, Terwee CB.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jan;63(1):37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.011. Epub 2009 Jun 21.

PMID:
19540720
5.

Linking measurement error to minimal important change of patient-reported outcomes.

Terwee CB, Roorda LD, Knol DL, De Boer MR, De Vet HC.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1062-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.011. Epub 2009 Feb 20.

PMID:
19230609
6.

US norms for six generic health-related quality-of-life indexes from the National Health Measurement study.

Fryback DG, Dunham NC, Palta M, Hanmer J, Buechner J, Cherepanov D, Herrington SA, Hays RD, Kaplan RM, Ganiats TG, Feeny D, Kind P.

Med Care. 2007 Dec;45(12):1162-70.

7.

The mathematical relationship among different forms of responsiveness coefficients.

Norman GR, Wyrwich KW, Patrick DL.

Qual Life Res. 2007 Jun;16(5):815-22. Epub 2007 Mar 10.

PMID:
17351823
8.
10.

A randomized clinical trial of lung volume reduction surgery versus best medical care for patients with advanced emphysema: a two-year study from Canada.

Miller JD, Malthaner RA, Goldsmith CH, Goeree R, Higgins D, Cox PG, Tan L, Road JD; Canadian Lung Volume Reduction Surgery Study.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Jan;81(1):314-20; discussion 320-1.

PMID:
16368389
11.

Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes.

Wyrwich KW, Bullinger M, Aaronson N, Hays RD, Patrick DL, Symonds T; Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group.

Qual Life Res. 2005 Mar;14(2):285-95.

PMID:
15892420
12.

US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model.

Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ.

Med Care. 2005 Mar;43(3):203-20.

PMID:
15725977
13.

Is the Health Utilities Index valid in total hip arthroplasty patients?

Blanchard C, Feeny D, Mahon JL, Bourne R, Rorabeck C, Stitt L, Webster-Bogaert S.

Qual Life Res. 2004 Mar;13(2):339-48.

PMID:
15085906
14.

On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation.

Terwee CB, Dekker FW, Wiersinga WM, Prummel MF, Bossuyt PM.

Qual Life Res. 2003 Jun;12(4):349-62.

PMID:
12797708
15.
16.

The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.

Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M.

J Health Econ. 2002 Mar;21(2):271-92.

PMID:
11939242
17.

Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures.

Guyatt GH, Osoba D, Wu AW, Wyrwich KW, Norman GR; Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group.

Mayo Clin Proc. 2002 Apr;77(4):371-83. Review.

PMID:
11936935
18.

Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system.

Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance GW, Goldsmith CH, Zhu Z, DePauw S, Denton M, Boyle M.

Med Care. 2002 Feb;40(2):113-28.

PMID:
11802084
19.

EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group.

Rabin R, de Charro F.

Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):337-43. Review.

PMID:
11491192
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center