Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 15

1.

Recent Advances in Cigarette Ignition Propensity Research and Development.

Alpert HR, O'Connor RJ, Spalletta R, Connolly GN.

Fire Technol. 2010 Apr 1;46(2):275-289.

2.

Estimation of nicotine and tar yields from human-smoked cigarettes before and after the implementation of the cigarette ignition propensity regulations in Canada.

Côté F, Létourneau C, Mullard G, Voisine R.

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Dec 1;61(3 Suppl):S51-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.03.004. Epub 2010 Mar 18.

3.

Clinical trials methods for evaluation of potential reduced exposure products.

Hatsukami DK, Hanson K, Briggs A, Parascandola M, Genkinger JM, O'Connor R, Shields PG.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Dec;18(12):3143-95. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0654. Review.

4.

Regulatory assessment of brand changes in the commercial tobacco product market.

Wayne GF, Connolly GN.

Tob Control. 2009 Aug;18(4):302-9. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.030502. Epub 2009 Jun 14.

PMID:
19528042
5.

Concentration and profile of 22 urinary polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon metabolites in the US population.

Li Z, Sandau CD, Romanoff LC, Caudill SP, Sjodin A, Needham LL, Patterson DG Jr.

Environ Res. 2008 Jul;107(3):320-31. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2008.01.013. Epub 2008 Mar 3.

PMID:
18313659
6.

Europe: agreement on reducing cigarette fires.

Arnott D, Berteletti F.

Tob Control. 2008 Feb;17(1):4-5. No abstract available.

7.

Toxicological evaluation of cigarettes with two banded cigarette paper technologies.

Theophilus EH, Pence DH, Meckley DR, Keith Shreve W, Ayres PH, Bombick BR, Borgerding MF, Garner CD, Swauger JE.

Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2007 Sep;59(1):17-27. Epub 2007 Jun 21.

PMID:
17590321
8.

Clinical laboratory evaluation of potential reduced exposure products for smokers.

Breland AB, Kleykamp BA, Eissenberg T.

Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Dec;8(6):727-38.

PMID:
17132520
9.

Measurement of urinary monohydroxy polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using automated liquid-liquid extraction and gas chromatography/isotope dilution high-resolution mass spectrometry.

Li Z, Romanoff LC, Trinidad DA, Hussain N, Jones RS, Porter EN, Patterson DG Jr, Sjödin A.

Anal Chem. 2006 Aug 15;78(16):5744-51.

PMID:
16906719
10.

Smokers' reactions to reduced ignition propensity cigarettes.

O'Connor RJ, Giovino GA, Fix BV, Hyland A, Hammond D, Fong GT, Bauer U, Cummings KM.

Tob Control. 2006 Feb;15(1):45-9.

11.

Canada gets its house in order.

Stanwick R.

Inj Prev. 2005 Oct;11(5):259-60. No abstract available.

12.

Effect of the New York State cigarette fire safety standard on ignition propensity, smoke constituents, and the consumer market.

Connolly GN, Alpert HR, Rees V, Carpenter C, Wayne GF, Vallone D, Koh H.

Tob Control. 2005 Oct;14(5):321-7.

13.

Carcinogen exposure during short-term switching from regular to "light" cigarettes.

Benowitz NL, Jacob P 3rd, Bernert JT, Wilson M, Wang L, Allen F, Dempsey D.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Jun;14(6):1376-83.

14.
15.

The case for fire safe cigarettes made through industry documents.

Gunja M, Wayne GF, Landman A, Connolly G, McGuire A.

Tob Control. 2002 Dec;11(4):346-53. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center