Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 35

1.

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D.

PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100. Epub 2009 Jul 21.

2.

Value judgments in the analysis and synthesis of evidence.

Strech D, Tilburt J.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;61(6):521-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.01.001. Review.

PMID:
18471654
3.

GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ; GRADE Working Group.

BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD. No abstract available.

4.

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.

Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M; STROBE initiative.

Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 16;147(8):W163-94.

PMID:
17938389
5.

Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews.

Moher D, Tetzlaff J, Tricco AC, Sampson M, Altman DG.

PLoS Med. 2007 Mar 27;4(3):e78.

6.

The case of the misleading funnel plot.

Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Schmid CH, Olkin I.

BMJ. 2006 Sep 16;333(7568):597-600. Review. No abstract available.

7.

An official ATS statement: grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations.

Schünemann HJ, Jaeschke R, Cook DJ, Bria WF, El-Solh AA, Ernst A, Fahy BF, Gould MK, Horan KL, Krishnan JA, Manthous CA, Maurer JR, McNicholas WT, Oxman AD, Rubenfeld G, Turino GM, Guyatt G; ATS Documents Development and Implementation Committee.

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Sep 1;174(5):605-14. No abstract available.

PMID:
16931644
8.

Systematic reviews: when is an update an update?

Moher D, Tsertsvadze A.

Lancet. 2006 Mar 18;367(9514):881-3. No abstract available.

PMID:
16546523
9.

Acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: a case study of the pitfalls in the evolution of evidence.

Bagshaw SM, McAlister FA, Manns BJ, Ghali WA.

Arch Intern Med. 2006 Jan 23;166(2):161-6. Review.

PMID:
16432083
10.

Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study.

Biondi-Zoccai GG, Lotrionte M, Abbate A, Testa L, Remigi E, Burzotta F, Valgimigli M, Romagnoli E, Crea F, Agostoni P.

BMJ. 2006 Jan 28;332(7535):202-9. Epub 2006 Jan 16. Review.

11.

A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature.

Delaney A, Bagshaw SM, Ferland A, Manns B, Laupland KB, Doig CJ.

Crit Care. 2005 Oct 5;9(5):R575-82. Epub 2005 Sep 9. Review.

12.

Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making.

Lavis J, Davies H, Oxman A, Denis JL, Golden-Biddle K, Ferlie E.

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:35-48.

PMID:
16053582
13.

Putting clinical trials into context.

Young C, Horton R.

Lancet. 2005 Jul 9-15;366(9480):107-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
16005318
14.

Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study.

Moja LP, Telaro E, D'Amico R, Moschetti I, Coe L, Liberati A.

BMJ. 2005 May 7;330(7499):1053. Epub 2005 Apr 7.

15.

Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Chan AW, Krleza-Jerić K, Schmid I, Altman DG.

CMAJ. 2004 Sep 28;171(7):735-40.

16.

Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

De Angelis C, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, Haug C, Hoey J, Horton R, Kotzin S, Laine C, Marusic A, Overbeke AJ, Schroeder TV, Sox HC, Van Der Weyden MB; International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

CMAJ. 2004 Sep 14;171(6):606-7. No abstract available.

17.

The quality of systematic reviews in dentistry.

Richards D.

Evid Based Dent. 2004;5(1):17.

PMID:
15238972
18.

Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.

Chan AW, Hróbjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG.

JAMA. 2004 May 26;291(20):2457-65.

PMID:
15161896
19.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished data.

Whittington CJ, Kendall T, Fonagy P, Cottrell D, Cotgrove A, Boddington E.

Lancet. 2004 Apr 24;363(9418):1341-5. Review.

PMID:
15110490
20.

Number of published systematic reviews and global burden of disease: database analysis.

Swingler GH, Volmink J, Ioannidis JP.

BMJ. 2003 Nov 8;327(7423):1083-4. No abstract available.

Supplemental Content

Support Center