Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 26

1.

Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee joint.

Kijowski R, Blankenbaker DG, Davis KW, Shinki K, Kaplan LD, De Smet AA.

Radiology. 2009 Mar;250(3):839-48. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2503080822. Epub 2009 Jan 21.

PMID:
19164121
2.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the ankle at 3.0 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla in human cadaver specimens with artificially created lesions of cartilage and ligaments.

Bauer JS, Barr C, Henning TD, Malfair D, Ma CB, Steinbach L, Link TM.

Invest Radiol. 2008 Sep;43(9):604-11. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31817e9ada.

PMID:
18708853
3.

Comparison of image quality in magnetic resonance imaging of the knee at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla using 32-channel receiver coils.

Schoth F, Kraemer N, Niendorf T, Hohl C, Gunther RW, Krombach GA.

Eur Radiol. 2008 Oct;18(10):2258-64. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-0972-3. Epub 2008 May 8.

PMID:
18463874
4.

Health technology assessment of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee.

Huysse WC, Verstraete KL.

Eur J Radiol. 2008 Feb;65(2):190-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.11.011. Epub 2008 Jan 14. Review.

PMID:
18248929
5.
6.

Articular cartilage defects detected with 3D water-excitation true FISP: prospective comparison with sequences commonly used for knee imaging.

Duc SR, Pfirrmann CW, Schmid MR, Zanetti M, Koch PP, Kalberer F, Hodler J.

Radiology. 2007 Oct;245(1):216-23. Epub 2007 Aug 23.

PMID:
17717327
7.

Three-tesla MR imaging of the knee.

Magee T.

Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2007 Feb;15(1):125-32. Review.

PMID:
17499185
8.

Cartilage imaging: motivation, techniques, current and future significance.

Link TM, Stahl R, Woertler K.

Eur Radiol. 2007 May;17(5):1135-46. Epub 2006 Nov 9. Review.

PMID:
17093967
9.

MR imaging of the ankle at 3 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla: protocol optimization and application to cartilage, ligament and tendon pathology in cadaver specimens.

Barr C, Bauer JS, Malfair D, Ma B, Henning TD, Steinbach L, Link TM.

Eur Radiol. 2007 Jun;17(6):1518-28. Epub 2006 Oct 24.

PMID:
17061070
10.

3.0-T MRI of meniscal tears.

Magee T, Williams D.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Aug;187(2):371-5.

PMID:
16861540
11.

Accuracy of 3-T MRI using fast spin-echo technique to detect meniscal tears of the knee.

Ramnath RR, Magee T, Wasudev N, Murrah R.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jul;187(1):221-5.

PMID:
16794180
12.

Is the body-coil at 3 Tesla feasible for the MRI evaluation of the painful knee? A comparative study.

Lutterbey G, Behrends K, Falkenhausen MV, Wattjes MP, Morakkabati N, Gieseke J, Schild H.

Eur Radiol. 2007 Feb;17(2):503-8. Epub 2006 Apr 8.

PMID:
16604322
13.

3T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system (Part I): considerations, coils, and challenges.

Ramnath RR.

Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2006 Feb;14(1):27-40. Review.

PMID:
16530633
14.

Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage: trauma, degeneration, and repair.

Potter HG, Foo LF.

Am J Sports Med. 2006 Apr;34(4):661-77. Epub 2005 Dec 19. Review.

PMID:
16365371
15.

3.0 vs 1.5 T MRI in the detection of focal cartilage pathology--ROC analysis in an experimental model.

Link TM, Sell CA, Masi JN, Phan C, Newitt D, Lu Y, Steinbach L, Majumdar S.

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006 Jan;14(1):63-70. Epub 2005 Sep 26.

16.

Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a porcine model.

Masi JN, Sell CA, Phan C, Han E, Newitt D, Steinbach L, Majumdar S, Link TM.

Radiology. 2005 Jul;236(1):140-50.

PMID:
15987970
17.

Three-tesla imaging of the knee: initial experience.

Craig JG, Go L, Blechinger J, Hearshen D, Bouffard JA, Diamond M, van Holsbeeck MT.

Skeletal Radiol. 2005 Aug;34(8):453-61. Epub 2005 Jun 21.

PMID:
15968554
18.

Magnetic resonance imaging of hyaline cartilage defects at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of medium T2-weighted fast spin echo, T1-weighted two-dimensional and three-dimensional gradient echo pulse sequences.

Fischbach F, Bruhn H, Unterhauser F, Ricke J, Wieners G, Felix R, Weiler A, Schröder RJ.

Acta Radiol. 2005 Feb;46(1):67-73. Erratum in: Acta Radiol. 2005 Apr;46(2):218.

PMID:
15841742
19.
20.

The time for 3T clinical imaging is now.

Shapiro MD, Magee T, Williams D, Ramnath R, Ross JS.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004 Oct;25(9):1628-9; author reply 1629. No abstract available.

Supplemental Content

Support Center