Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 27

1.

Fams-ace: a combined method to select the best model after remodeling all server models.

Terashi G, Takeda-Shitaka M, Kanou K, Iwadate M, Takaya D, Hosoi A, Ohta K, Umeyama H.

Proteins. 2007;69 Suppl 8:98-107.

PMID:
17894329
2.

OPUS-Ca: a knowledge-based potential function requiring only Calpha positions.

Wu Y, Lu M, Chen M, Li J, Ma J.

Protein Sci. 2007 Jul;16(7):1449-63.

3.

Servers for protein structure prediction.

Fischer D.

Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2006 Apr;16(2):178-82. Epub 2006 Mar 20. Review.

PMID:
16546376
5.

Pcons5: combining consensus, structural evaluation and fold recognition scores.

Wallner B, Elofsson A.

Bioinformatics. 2005 Dec 1;21(23):4248-54. Epub 2005 Oct 4.

PMID:
16204344
6.

Progress over the first decade of CASP experiments.

Kryshtafovych A, Venclovas C, Fidelis K, Moult J.

Proteins. 2005;61 Suppl 7:225-36.

PMID:
16187365
7.

SPARKS 2 and SP3 servers in CASP6.

Zhou H, Zhou Y.

Proteins. 2005;61 Suppl 7:152-6.

PMID:
16187357
8.

Calibrating E-values for hidden Markov models using reverse-sequence null models.

Karplus K, Karchin R, Shackelford G, Hughey R.

Bioinformatics. 2005 Nov 15;21(22):4107-15. Epub 2005 Aug 25.

PMID:
16123115
9.

A decade of CASP: progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction.

Moult J.

Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2005 Jun;15(3):285-9. Review.

PMID:
15939584
10.

TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score.

Zhang Y, Skolnick J.

Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Apr 22;33(7):2302-9. Print 2005.

11.

Combining prediction of secondary structure and solvent accessibility in proteins.

Adamczak R, Porollo A, Meller J.

Proteins. 2005 May 15;59(3):467-75.

PMID:
15768403
12.
13.

Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality.

Zhang Y, Skolnick J.

Proteins. 2004 Dec 1;57(4):702-10. Erratum in: Proteins. 2007 Sep 1;68(4):1020.

PMID:
15476259
14.

Accurate prediction of solvent accessibility using neural networks-based regression.

Adamczak R, Porollo A, Meller J.

Proteins. 2004 Sep 1;56(4):753-67.

PMID:
15281128
15.

Enriching the sequence substitution matrix by structural information.

Teodorescu O, Galor T, Pillardy J, Elber R.

Proteins. 2004 Jan 1;54(1):41-8.

PMID:
14705022
16.

Improvement of the GenTHREADER method for genomic fold recognition.

McGuffin LJ, Jones DT.

Bioinformatics. 2003 May 1;19(7):874-81.

PMID:
12724298
17.

Maximum feasibility guideline in the design and analysis of protein folding potentials.

Meller J, Wagner M, Elber R.

J Comput Chem. 2002 Jan 15;23(1):111-8.

PMID:
11913376
18.
19.

Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes.

Martí-Renom MA, Stuart AC, Fiser A, Sánchez R, Melo F, Sali A.

Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2000;29:291-325. Review.

PMID:
10940251
20.

The Protein Data Bank.

Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE.

Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):235-42.

Supplemental Content

Support Center