Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 173

1.

Study of a needleless intermittent intravenous-access system for peripheral infusions: analysis of staff, patient, and institutional outcomes.

Mendelson MH, Short LJ, Schechter CB, Meyers BR, Rodriguez M, Cohen S, Lozada J, DeCambre M, Hirschman SZ.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1998 Jun;19(6):401-6.

PMID:
9669621
2.

Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a needleless intravenous access system.

Yassi A, McGill ML, Khokhar JB.

Am J Infect Control. 1995 Apr;23(2):57-64.

PMID:
7639404
3.

Randomized prospective study of the impact of three needleless intravenous systems on needlestick injury rates.

L'Ecuyer PB, Schwab EO, Iademarco E, Barr N, Aton EA, Fraser VJ.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;17(12):803-8.

PMID:
8985767
4.

Evaluation of the acceptability of a needleless vascular-access system by nurses.

Ihrig M, Cookson ST, Campbell K, Hartstein AI, Jarvis WR.

Am J Infect Control. 1997 Oct;25(5):434-8.

PMID:
9343631
5.

Do protective devices prevent needlestick injuries among health care workers?

Orenstein R, Reynolds L, Karabaic M, Lamb A, Markowitz SM, Wong ES.

Am J Infect Control. 1995 Dec;23(6):344-51.

PMID:
8821109
6.
7.

The effectiveness of a needleless intravenous connection system: an assessment by injury rate and user satisfaction.

Lawrence LW, Delclos GL, Felknor SA, Johnson PC, Frankowski RF, Cooper SP, Davidson A.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1997 Mar;18(3):175-82.

PMID:
9090545
8.

Needleless intravenous systems: A review.

Russo PL, Harrington GA, Spelman DW.

Am J Infect Control. 1999 Oct;27(5):431-4. Review.

PMID:
10511490
9.

Implementation of a needleless intravenous access system at the University of Virginia Hospital.

Fassel K, Coyner BJ, Jagger J.

QRC Advis. 1994 May;10(7):4-5. No abstract available.

PMID:
10134073
10.

Comparison of a needleless system with conventional heparin locks.

Adams KS, Zehrer CL, Thomas W.

Am J Infect Control. 1993 Oct;21(5):263-9.

PMID:
8267238
11.

Microbiologic evaluation of needleless and needle-access devices.

Arduino MJ, Bland LA, Danzig LE, McAllister SK, Aguero SM.

Am J Infect Control. 1997 Oct;25(5):377-80.

PMID:
9343619
12.

Impact of a needleless intravenous system in a university hospital.

Gartner K.

J Healthc Mater Manage. 1993 Sep;11(8):44-6, 48-9.

PMID:
10128146
13.
14.
15.

A needleless closed system device (CLAVE) protects from intravascular catheter tip and hub colonization: a prospective randomized study.

Bouza E, Muñoz P, López-Rodríguez J, Jesús Pérez M, Rincón C, Martín Rabadán P, Sánchez C, Bastida E.

J Hosp Infect. 2003 Aug;54(4):279-87.

PMID:
12919758
16.

Increased bloodstream infection rates in surgical patients associated with variation from recommended use and care following implementation of a needleless device.

Cookson ST, Ihrig M, O'Mara EM, Denny M, Volk H, Banerjee SN, Hartstein AI, Jarvis WR.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1998 Jan;19(1):23-7.

PMID:
9475345
17.

Evaluation and implementation of a needleless intravenous system: making needlesticks a needless problem.

Skolnick R, LaRocca J, Barba D, Paicius L.

Am J Infect Control. 1993 Feb;21(1):39-41.

PMID:
8442521
18.

The benefits and limitations of needle protectors and needleless intravenous systems.

Orenstein R.

J Intraven Nurs. 1999 May-Jun;22(3):122-8. Review.

PMID:
10640075
19.

Increased rate of catheter-related bloodstream infection associated with use of a needleless mechanical valve device at a long-term acute care hospital.

Salgado CD, Chinnes L, Paczesny TH, Cantey JR.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;28(6):684-8. Epub 2007 May 14.

PMID:
17520541
20.

Intravenous maintenance with a saline lock intermittent infusion device in the prehospital environment.

Carducci B, Stein K.

Prehosp Disaster Med. 1994 Jan-Mar;9(1):67-70.

PMID:
10146608

Supplemental Content

Support Center