Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 96

1.

Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough.

Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH.

Lancet. 1998 Jan 10;351(9096):123-7.

PMID:
9439507
3.

Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials: the need for complete data.

Clarke MJ, Stewart LA.

J Eval Clin Pract. 1995 Nov;1(2):119-26. Review.

PMID:
9238566
4.

The role of meta-analyses in assessing cancer treatments.

Sylvester R, Collette L, Duchateau L.

Eur J Cancer. 2000 Jul;36(11):1351-8. Review.

PMID:
10899647
5.

Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis.

Rücker G, Carpenter JR, Schwarzer G.

Biom J. 2011 Mar;53(2):351-68. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201000151. Epub 2011 Jan 14.

PMID:
21374698
6.

Meta-analyses: what they can and cannot do.

Nordmann AJ, Kasenda B, Briel M.

Swiss Med Wkly. 2012 Mar 9;142:w13518. doi: 10.4414/smw.2012.13518. Review.

7.

Problems caused by heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a case study of acupuncture trials.

Prady SL, Burch J, Crouch S, MacPherson H.

Acupunct Med. 2014 Feb;32(1):56-61. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2013-010364. Epub 2013 Oct 18.

PMID:
24140758
8.

Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.

Tierney JF, Stewart LA.

Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Feb;34(1):79-87. Epub 2004 Nov 23.

PMID:
15561753
9.

Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.

Finckh A, Tramèr MR.

Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008 Mar;4(3):146-52. doi: 10.1038/ncprheum0732. Review.

PMID:
18227829
10.

Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.

Shrier I, Boivin JF, Steele RJ, Platt RW, Furlan A, Kakuma R, Brophy J, Rossignol M.

Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Nov 15;166(10):1203-9. Epub 2007 Aug 21.

PMID:
17712019
11.

Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.

Rinchuse DJ, Rinchuse DJ, Kandasamy S, Ackerman MB.

World J Orthod. 2008 Summer;9(2):167-76.

PMID:
18575311
12.
13.

Risk of bias: a simulation study of power to detect study-level moderator effects in meta-analysis.

Hempel S, Miles JN, Booth MJ, Wang Z, Morton SC, Shekelle PG.

Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 28;2:107. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-107.

14.

Evidence-based medicine: how good is the evidence?

Celermajer DS.

Med J Aust. 2001 Mar 19;174(6):293-5.

PMID:
11297118
15.

A new form of meta-analysis for combining results from randomized clinical trials and medical-practice databases.

Droitcour J, Silberman G, Chelimsky E.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1993 Summer;9(3):440-9.

PMID:
8340208
16.
17.

Methods of meta-analysis: an analysis.

Koretz RL.

Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2002 Sep;5(5):467-74. Review.

PMID:
12172468
19.

On the criteria used for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials included in systematic reviews and meta-analyses addressing adverse effects.

Bonovas S, Lytras T, Nikolopoulos G.

Eur J Epidemiol. 2015 Mar;30(3):249-50. doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-0015-8. Epub 2015 Mar 15. No abstract available.

PMID:
25773753
20.

Meta-analyses and overviews of randomised trials.

Richards SM.

Blood Rev. 1995 Jun;9(2):85-91. Review.

PMID:
7580394

Supplemental Content

Support Center