Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 159

1.

Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging.

Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE, Kopans DB, Castleberry DE, Opsahl-Ong BH, Landberg CE, Slanetz PJ, Giardino AA, Moore R, Albagli D, DeJule MC, Fitzgerald PF, Fobare DF, Giambattista BW, Kwasnick RF, Liu J, Lubowski SJ, Possin GE, Richotte JF, Wei CY, Wirth RF.

Radiology. 1997 Nov;205(2):399-406.

PMID:
9356620
2.

Digital breast imaging: tomosynthesis and digital subtraction mammography.

Niklason LT, Kopans DB, Hamberg LM.

Breast Dis. 1998 Aug;10(3-4):151-64.

PMID:
15687571
3.

Experimental phantom lesion detectability study using a digital breast tomosynthesis prototype system.

Schulz-Wendtland R, Wenkel E, Lell M, Böhner C, Bautz WA, Mertelmeier T.

Rofo. 2006 Dec;178(12):1219-23.

PMID:
17136645
4.

Contrast detail phantom comparison on a commercially available unit. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) versus full-field digital mammography (FFDM).

Bertolini M, Nitrosi A, Borasi G, Botti A, Tassoni D, Sghedoni R, Zuccoli G.

J Digit Imaging. 2011 Feb;24(1):58-65. doi: 10.1007/s10278-009-9270-0.

5.

X-ray tomosynthesis: a review of its use for breast and chest imaging.

Tingberg A.

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010 Apr-May;139(1-3):100-7. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq099. Epub 2010 Mar 16. Review.

PMID:
20233756
6.

Comparison of a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system to magnified 2D mammography using breast tissue specimens.

Tucker AW, Calliste J, Gidcumb EM, Wu J, Kuzmiak CM, Hyun N, Zeng D, Lu J, Zhou O, Lee YZ.

Acad Radiol. 2014 Dec;21(12):1547-52. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

7.

Value of one-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in diagnostic workup of women with clinical signs and symptoms and in women recalled from screening.

Waldherr C, Cerny P, Altermatt HJ, Berclaz G, Ciriolo M, Buser K, Sonnenschein MJ.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jan;200(1):226-31. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.8202.

PMID:
23255766
8.

Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial.

Rafferty EA, Park JM, Philpotts LE, Poplack SP, Sumkin JH, Halpern EF, Niklason LT.

Radiology. 2013 Jan;266(1):104-13. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120674. Epub 2012 Nov 20.

9.

Comparison of tomosynthesis methods used with digital mammography.

Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Glick SJ, D'Orsi CJ, Baker SP, Webber RL.

Acad Radiol. 2000 Dec;7(12):1085-97.

PMID:
11131053
10.

[Digital breast tomosynthesis].

Preibsch H, Siegmann-Luz KC.

Radiologe. 2015 Jan;55(1):59-67; quiz 68-70. doi: 10.1007/s00117-014-2753-0. German.

PMID:
25609581
11.

Stationary intraoral digital tomosynthesis using a carbon nanotube X-ray source array.

Shan J, Tucker AW, Gaalaas LR, Wu G, Platin E, Mol A, Lu J, Zhou O.

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(9):20150098. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20150098. Epub 2015 Jun 19.

12.

Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis.

Chen SC, Carton AK, Albert M, Conant EF, Schnall MD, Maidment AD.

Acad Radiol. 2007 Feb;14(2):229-38.

13.

Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.

Sechopoulos I, Suryanarayanan S, Vedantham S, D'Orsi C, Karellas A.

Med Phys. 2007 Jan;34(1):221-32.

14.

X-ray phase-contrast tomosynthesis for improved breast tissue discrimination.

Schleede S, Bech M, Grandl S, Sztrókay A, Herzen J, Mayr D, Stockmar M, Potdevin G, Zanette I, Rack A, Weitkamp T, Pfeiffer F.

Eur J Radiol. 2014 Mar;83(3):531-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.12.005. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

PMID:
24387825
15.

Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings.

Andersson I, Ikeda DM, Zackrisson S, Ruschin M, Svahn T, Timberg P, Tingberg A.

Eur Radiol. 2008 Dec;18(12):2817-25. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1076-9. Epub 2008 Jul 19.

PMID:
18641998
16.

Digital tomosynthesis aided by low-resolution exact computed tomography.

Zeng K, Yu H, Zhao S, Fajardo LL, Ruth C, Jing Z, Wang G.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007 Nov-Dec;31(6):976-83.

PMID:
18043366
17.

Investigation of absorbed radiation dose in refraction-enhanced breast tomosynthesis by a Laue case analyser.

Sato H, Ando M, Shimao D.

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2011 Jul;146(1-3):231-3. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncr157. Epub 2011 Apr 22.

PMID:
21515613
18.

Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type.

Cole EB, Pisano ED, Kistner EO, Muller KE, Brown ME, Feig SA, Jong RA, Maidment AD, Staiger MJ, Kuzmiak CM, Freimanis RI, Lesko N, Rosen EL, Walsh R, Williford M, Braeuning MP.

Radiology. 2003 Jan;226(1):153-60.

PMID:
12511684
19.

Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography.

Diekmann F, Bick U.

Eur Radiol. 2007 Dec;17(12):3086-92. Epub 2007 Jul 28.

PMID:
17661053
20.

Comparative effectiveness of combined digital mammography and tomosynthesis screening for women with dense breasts.

Lee CI, Cevik M, Alagoz O, Sprague BL, Tosteson AN, Miglioretti DL, Kerlikowske K, Stout NK, Jarvik JG, Ramsey SD, Lehman CD.

Radiology. 2015 Mar;274(3):772-80. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14141237. Epub 2014 Oct 28.

Supplemental Content

Support Center