Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 279

1.

Full-thickness pressure ulcers: patient and wound healing characteristics.

van Rijswijk L.

Decubitus. 1993 Jan;6(1):16-21.

PMID:
8427640
2.

Pressure ulcers--randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings.

Chang KW, Alsagoff S, Ong KT, Sim PH.

Med J Malaysia. 1998 Dec;53(4):428-31.

3.
4.
5.

A randomized clinical study comparing a hydrocellular dressing to a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of pressure ulcers.

Seeley J, Jensen JL, Hutcherson J.

Ostomy Wound Manage. 1999 Jun;45(6):39-44, 46-7.

PMID:
10655861
6.

A comparative study of three occlusive dressings in the treatment of full-thickness wounds in pigs.

Agren MS, Mertz PM, Franzén L.

J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997 Jan;36(1):53-8.

PMID:
8996261
7.

Managing sacral pressure ulcers with hydrocolloid dressings: results of a controlled, clinical study.

Day A, Dombranski S, Farkas C, Foster C, Godin J, Moody M, Morrison M, Tamer C.

Ostomy Wound Manage. 1995 Mar;41(2):52-4, 56, 58 passim.

PMID:
7598778
8.

Sequential treatment with calcium alginate dressings and hydrocolloid dressings accelerates pressure ulcer healing in older subjects: a multicenter randomized trial of sequential versus nonsequential treatment with hydrocolloid dressings alone.

Belmin J, Meaume S, Rabus MT, Bohbot S; Investigators of the Sequential Treatment of the Elderly with Pressure Sores (STEPS) Trial.

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Feb;50(2):269-74.

PMID:
12028208
9.

A comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of managing pressure ulcers.

Colwell JC, Foreman MD, Trotter JP.

Decubitus. 1993 Jul;6(4):28-36.

PMID:
8297488
11.

A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers.

Brown-Etris M, Milne C, Orsted H, Gates JL, Netsch D, Punchello M, Couture N, Albert M, Attrell E, Freyberg J.

Adv Skin Wound Care. 2008 Apr;21(4):169-74. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000305429.01413.f8.

PMID:
18385577
12.

Hydrocolloid versus saline-gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Xakellis GC, Chrischilles EA.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 May;73(5):463-9.

PMID:
1580775
13.

A prospective, randomized trial of Unna's boot versus Duoderm CGF hydroactive dressing plus compression in the management of venous leg ulcers.

Cordts PR, Hanrahan LM, Rodriguez AA, Woodson J, LaMorte WW, Menzoian JO.

J Vasc Surg. 1992 Mar;15(3):480-6.

PMID:
1538504
14.

Simplifying modern wound management for nonprofessional caregivers.

Seaman S, Herbster S, Muglia J, Murray M, Rick C.

Ostomy Wound Manage. 2000 Aug;46(8):18-27.

PMID:
11189544
15.

A comparison of two dressings in the management of chronic wounds.

Thomas S, Banks V, Bale S, Fear-Price M, Hagelstein S, Harding KG, Orpin J, Thomas N.

J Wound Care. 1997 Sep;6(8):383-6.

PMID:
9341430
16.

Two hydrocolloid dressings evaluated in experimental full-thickness wounds in the skin.

Agren MS, Everland H.

Acta Derm Venereol. 1997 Mar;77(2):127-31.

PMID:
9111823
17.
18.

Healing of diabetic foot ulcers and pressure ulcers with human skin equivalent: a new paradigm in wound healing.

Brem H, Balledux J, Bloom T, Kerstein MD, Hollier L.

Arch Surg. 2000 Jun;135(6):627-34.

PMID:
10843357
19.

Management of leg ulcers with hydrocolloid occlusive dressing.

Friedman SJ, Su WP.

Arch Dermatol. 1984 Oct;120(10):1329-36.

PMID:
6486846
20.

[Comparison of the effectiveness and cost of treatment with humid environment as compared to traditional cure. Clinical trial on primary care patients with venous leg ulcers and pressure ulcers].

Capillas Pérez R, Cabré Aguilar V, Gil Colomé AM, Gaitano García A, Torra i Bou JE.

Rev Enferm. 2000 Jan;23(1):17-24. Spanish.

PMID:
10788945

Supplemental Content

Support Center