Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 127

1.

Relationship between malpractice claims and cesarean delivery.

Localio AR, Lawthers AG, Bengtson JM, Hebert LE, Weaver SL, Brennan TA, Landis JR.

JAMA. 1993 Jan 20;269(3):366-73.

PMID:
8418343
2.

Socioeconomic factors and the odds of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

King DE, Lahiri K.

JAMA. 1994 Aug 17;272(7):524-9.

PMID:
8046806
3.
4.

The cesarean decision in New York State, 1986. Economic and noneconomic aspects.

Tussing AD, Wojtowycz MA.

Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):529-40.

PMID:
1593918
5.

Defensive medicine and obstetrics.

Baldwin LM, Hart LG, Lloyd M, Fordyce M, Rosenblatt RA.

JAMA. 1995 Nov 22-29;274(20):1606-10.

PMID:
7474245
6.
7.

The impact of malpractice liability claims on obstetrical practice patterns.

Gimm GW.

Health Serv Res. 2010 Feb;45(1):195-211. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01062.x. Epub 2009 Nov 19.

8.

The impact of malpractice fears on cesarean section rates.

Dubay L, Kaestner R, Waidmann T.

J Health Econ. 1999 Aug;18(4):491-522.

PMID:
10539619
9.

Hospital-Level Factors Associated with Anesthesia-Related Adverse Events in Cesarean Deliveries, New York State, 2009-2011.

Guglielminotti J, Deneux-Tharaux C, Wong CA, Li G.

Anesth Analg. 2016 Jun;122(6):1947-56. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001341.

PMID:
27195637
10.

Risk adjustment for interhospital comparison of primary cesarean rates.

Bailit JL, Dooley SL, Peaceman AN.

Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jun;93(6):1025-30.

PMID:
10362175
11.

The relationship between variations in cesarean delivery and regional health care use in the United States.

Little SE, Orav EJ, Robinson JN, Caughey AB, Jha AK.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;214(6):735.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.023. Epub 2015 Dec 22.

PMID:
26721777
12.

Do the poor sue more? A case-control study of malpractice claims and socioeconomic status.

Burstin HR, Johnson WG, Lipsitz SR, Brennan TA.

JAMA. 1993 Oct 13;270(14):1697-701.

PMID:
8411499
13.

Physician spending and subsequent risk of malpractice claims: observational study.

Jena AB, Schoemaker L, Bhattacharya J, Seabury SA.

BMJ. 2015 Nov 4;351:h5516. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5516.

14.

Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparisons of caesarean section rates in Taipei municipal hospitals.

Hsu CC, Shieh GR, Wu CS, Shen HC, Tang CH.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Aug;127(2):190-7. Epub 2005 Dec 1.

PMID:
16325330
15.

Reduced medicolegal risk by compliance with obstetric clinical pathways: a case--control study.

Ransom SB, Studdert DM, Dombrowski MP, Mello MM, Brennan TA.

Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Apr;101(4):751-5.

PMID:
12681881
16.

Malpractice claims data as a quality improvement tool. II. Is targeting effective?

Rolph JE, Kravitz RL, McGuigan K.

JAMA. 1991 Oct 16;266(15):2093-7.

PMID:
1920697
17.
18.

Association between hospital-level obstetric quality indicators and maternal and neonatal morbidity.

Howell EA, Zeitlin J, Hebert PL, Balbierz A, Egorova N.

JAMA. 2014 Oct 15;312(15):1531-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13381.

19.

Choice of cesarean section and perception of legal pressure.

Vimercati A, Greco P, Kardashi A, Rossi C, Loizzi V, Scioscia M, Loverro G.

J Perinat Med. 2000;28(2):111-7.

PMID:
10875095
20.

Effect of fear of litigation on obstetric care: a nationwide analysis on obstetric practice.

Zwecker P, Azoulay L, Abenhaim HA.

Am J Perinatol. 2011 Apr;28(4):277-84. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1271213. Epub 2011 Jan 19.

PMID:
21249618

Supplemental Content

Support Center