Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 97

1.

The impact of fraudulent research on the scientific literature. The Stephen E. Breuning case.

Garfield E, Welljams-Dorof A.

JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1424-6.

PMID:
2406476
2.

How long does it take for the scientific literature to purge itself of fraudulent material?: the Breuning case revisited.

Korpela KM.

Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Apr;26(4):843-7. doi: 10.1185/03007991003603804.

PMID:
20136577
3.

The scientific community's response to evidence of fraudulent publication. The Robert Slutsky case.

Whitely WP, Rennie D, Hafner AW.

JAMA. 1994 Jul 13;272(2):170-3.

PMID:
8015137
4.

Correcting the literature following fraudulent publication.

Friedman PJ.

JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1416-9.

PMID:
2406474
5.

The continued use of retracted, invalid scientific literature.

Pfeifer MP, Snodgrass GL.

JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1420-3.

PMID:
2406475
6.

Analysis and implications of retraction period and coauthorship of fraudulent publications.

Foo JY, Tan XJ.

Account Res. 2014;21(3):198-210. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2013.848799.

PMID:
24325213
7.

Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case.

Sox HC, Rennie D.

Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 18;144(8):609-13. Epub 2006 Mar 6.

PMID:
16522625
8.

The persistence of fraud in the literature: the Darsee case.

Kochan CA, Budd JM.

J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1992 Aug;43(7):488-93. No abstract available.

PMID:
11653988
9.

Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?

Steen RG.

J Med Ethics. 2011 Feb;37(2):113-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.038125. Epub 2010 Nov 15.

PMID:
21081306
10.

Many journals have not retracted "fraudulent" research.

Cooper-Mahkorn D.

BMJ. 1998 Jun 20;316(7148):1850. No abstract available.

PMID:
11645074
11.

Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.

Fox MF.

J Higher Educ. 1994 May-Jun;65(3):298-309. No abstract available.

PMID:
11653366
12.
13.

Misconduct in science is not rare, a survey finds.

Hilts PJ.

N Y Times Web. 1993 Nov 12:A22. No abstract available.

PMID:
11647007
14.

Citation indexing and evaluation of scientific papers.

Margolis J.

Science. 1967 Mar 10;155(3767):1213-9.

PMID:
5335153
15.

Whistleblowing: a very unpleasant avocation.

Sprague RL.

Ethics Behav. 1993;3(1):103-33.

PMID:
11653080
17.

Citation classics in anesthetic journals.

Baltussen A, Kindler CH.

Anesth Analg. 2004 Feb;98(2):443-51, table of contents.

PMID:
14742385
18.

The integrity of the scientific literature.

Stewart WW, Feder N.

Nature. 1987 Jan 15-21;325(6101):207-14.

PMID:
3808019
19.

[Fraud and misconduct in scientific publications].

Matías-Guiu J, García-Ramos R.

Neurologia. 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):1-4. Review. Spanish.

20.

Allocating credit and blame in science.

Chubin DE.

Sci Technol Human Values. 1988 Winter-Spring;13(1-2):53-63. No abstract available.

PMID:
11650139

Supplemental Content

Support Center