Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 100

1.

Establishing a gold standard for test sets: variation in interpretive agreement of expert mammographers.

Onega T, Anderson ML, Miglioretti DL, Buist DS, Geller B, Bogart A, Smith RA, Sickles EA, Monsees B, Bassett L, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K, Yankaskas BC.

Acad Radiol. 2013 Jun;20(6):731-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.01.012.

2.

Radiologist agreement for mammographic recall by case difficulty and finding type.

Onega T, Smith M, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Geller BA, Kerlikowske K, Buist DS, Rosenberg RD, Smith RA, Sickles EA, Haneuse S, Anderson ML, Yankaskas B.

J Am Coll Radiol. 2012 Nov;9(11):788-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.05.020.

3.

Radiologist Agreement for Mammographic Recall by Case Difficulty and Finding Type.

Onega T, Smith M, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Geller BA, Kerlikowske K, Buist DS, Rosenberg RD, Smith RA, Sickles EA, Haneuse S, Anderson ML, Yankaskas B.

J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Nov;13(11S):e72-e79. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.09.035.

PMID:
27814827
4.

Educational interventions to improve screening mammography interpretation: a randomized controlled trial.

Geller BM, Bogart A, Carney PA, Sickles EA, Smith R, Monsees B, Bassett LW, Buist DM, Kerlikowske K, Onega T, Yankaskas BC, Haneuse S, Hill D, Wallis MG, Miglioretti D.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jun;202(6):W586-96. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11147.

5.

Variability of interpretive accuracy among diagnostic mammography facilities.

Jackson SL, Taplin SH, Sickles EA, Abraham L, Barlow WE, Carney PA, Geller B, Berns EA, Cutter GR, Elmore JG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jun 3;101(11):814-27. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp105. Epub 2009 May 26.

6.

Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force [Internet].

Melnikow J, Fenton JJ, Whitlock EP, Miglioretti DL, Weyrich MS, Thompson JH, Shah K.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jan.

7.

Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial.

Rafferty EA, Park JM, Philpotts LE, Poplack SP, Sumkin JH, Halpern EF, Niklason LT.

Radiology. 2013 Jan;266(1):104-13. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120674. Epub 2012 Nov 20.

PMID:
23169790
8.

Radiographers supporting radiologists in the interpretation of screening mammography: a viable strategy to meet the shortage in the number of radiologists.

Torres-Mejía G, Smith RA, Carranza-Flores Mde L, Bogart A, Martínez-Matsushita L, Miglioretti DL, Kerlikowske K, Ortega-Olvera C, Montemayor-Varela E, Angeles-Llerenas A, Bautista-Arredondo S, Sánchez-González G, Martínez-Montañez OG, Uscanga-Sánchez SR, Lazcano-Ponce E, Hernández-Ávila M.

BMC Cancer. 2015 May 16;15:410. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1399-2.

9.

Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States.

Buist DS, Anderson ML, Haneuse SJ, Sickles EA, Smith RA, Carney PA, Taplin SH, Rosenberg RD, Geller BM, Onega TL, Monsees BS, Bassett LW, Yankaskas BC, Elmore JG, Kerlikowske K, Miglioretti DL.

Radiology. 2011 Apr;259(1):72-84. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10101698. Epub 2011 Feb 22.

10.

Association between time spent interpreting, level of confidence, and accuracy of screening mammography.

Carney PA, Bogart TA, Geller BM, Haneuse S, Kerlikowske K, Buist DS, Smith R, Rosenberg R, Yankaskas BC, Onega T, Miglioretti DL.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Apr;198(4):970-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.6988.

11.

Mammography facility characteristics associated with interpretive accuracy of screening mammography.

Taplin S, Abraham L, Barlow WE, Fenton JJ, Berns EA, Carney PA, Cutter GR, Sickles EA, Carl D, Elmore JG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Jun 18;100(12):876-87. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn172. Epub 2008 Jun 10.

12.

Criteria for identifying radiologists with acceptable screening mammography interpretive performance on basis of multiple performance measures.

Miglioretti DL, Ichikawa L, Smith RA, Bassett LW, Feig SA, Monsees B, Parikh JR, Rosenberg RD, Sickles EA, Carney PA.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Apr;204(4):W486-91. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.12313.

13.

Identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria for screening mammography.

Carney PA, Sickles EA, Monsees BS, Bassett LW, Brenner RJ, Feig SA, Smith RA, Rosenberg RD, Bogart TA, Browning S, Barry JW, Kelly MM, Tran KA, Miglioretti DL.

Radiology. 2010 May;255(2):354-61. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091636.

14.

Using a tailored web-based intervention to set goals to reduce unnecessary recall.

Carney PA, Bowles EJ, Sickles EA, Geller BM, Feig SA, Jackson S, Brown D, Cook A, Yankaskas BC, Miglioretti DL, Elmore JG.

Acad Radiol. 2011 Apr;18(4):495-503. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.11.017. Epub 2011 Jan 20.

15.

Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.

Skaane P, Balleyguier C, Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Piguet JC, Young K, Niklason LT.

Radiology. 2005 Oct;237(1):37-44. Epub 2005 Aug 11.

PMID:
16100086
16.

Decreased accuracy in interpretation of community-based screening mammography for women with multiple clinical risk factors.

Cook AJ, Elmore JG, Miglioretti DL, Sickles EA, Aiello Bowles EJ, Cutter GR, Carney PA.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;63(4):441-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.008. Epub 2009 Sep 9.

17.

Mammographic interpretive volume and diagnostic mammogram interpretation performance in community practice.

Haneuse S, Buist DS, Miglioretti DL, Anderson ML, Carney PA, Onega T, Geller BM, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas BC, Elmore JG, Taplin SH, Smith RA, Sickles EA.

Radiology. 2012 Jan;262(1):69-79. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11111026. Epub 2011 Nov 21.

18.

Mammographic features of breast cancers at single reading with computer-aided detection and at double reading in a large multicenter prospective trial of computer-aided detection: CADET II.

James JJ, Gilbert FJ, Wallis MG, Gillan MG, Astley SM, Boggis CR, Agbaje OF, Brentnall AR, Duffy SW.

Radiology. 2010 Aug;256(2):379-86. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091899.

PMID:
20656831
19.

Impact of computer-aided detection systems on radiologist accuracy with digital mammography.

Cole EB, Zhang Z, Marques HS, Edward Hendrick R, Yaffe MJ, Pisano ED.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Oct;203(4):909-16. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10187.

20.

Breast cancer detection rate: designing imaging trials to demonstrate improvements.

Jiang Y, Miglioretti DL, Metz CE, Schmidt RA.

Radiology. 2007 May;243(2):360-7.

PMID:
17456866

Supplemental Content

Support Center