Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 325

1.

Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix.

Avashia YJ, Mohan R, Berhane C, Oeltjen JC.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Mar;131(3):453-61. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31827c6d90.

PMID:
23446560
2.

Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications.

Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, Lipsitz S, Morris D, Kenney P, Eriksson E.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Feb;125(2):429-36. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c82d90.

PMID:
20124828
3.

Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix.

Vardanian AJ, Clayton JL, Roostaeian J, Shirvanian V, Da Lio A, Lipa JE, Crisera C, Festekjian JH.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Nov;128(5):403e-410e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b6637.

PMID:
22030500
4.

The use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction.

Weichman KE, Wilson SC, Weinstein AL, Hazen A, Levine JP, Choi M, Karp NS.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 May;129(5):1049-58. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824a2acb.

PMID:
22544088
5.

Sterile "ready-to-use" AlloDerm decreases postoperative infectious complications in patients undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix.

Weichman KE, Wilson SC, Saadeh PB, Hazen A, Levine JP, Choi M, Karp NS.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Oct;132(4):725-36. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829fe35b.

PMID:
23783060
6.

Breast reconstruction and revision surgery for implant-associated breast deformities using porcine acellular dermal matrix: a multicenter study of 156 cases.

Hille-Betz U, Kniebusch N, Wojcinski S, Henseler H, Heyl V, Ohlinger R, Paepke S, Klapdor R, Krause-Bergmann B.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Apr;22(4):1146-52. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4098-3. Epub 2014 Oct 10.

PMID:
25300607
7.

Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs.

Colwell AS, Damjanovic B, Zahedi B, Medford-Davis L, Hertl C, Austen WG Jr.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Dec;128(6):1170-8. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230c2f6.

PMID:
22094736
8.

Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity.

Sbitany H, Serletti JM.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Dec;128(6):1162-9. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230c29e. Review.

PMID:
22094735
10.

The effects of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant breast reconstruction after total skin-sparing mastectomy: results of a prospective practice improvement study.

Peled AW, Foster RD, Garwood ER, Moore DH, Ewing CA, Alvarado M, Hwang ES, Esserman LJ.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jun;129(6):901e-908e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824ec447.

PMID:
22634688
11.

Evaluating sterile human acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander-based breast reconstruction: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study.

Venturi ML, Mesbahi AN, Boehmler JH 4th, Marrogi AJ.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jan;131(1):9e-18e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182729d4f. Erratum in: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Mar;131(3):669.

PMID:
22990174
12.

A comparison of acellular dermal matrix to autologous dermal flaps in single-stage, implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Krishnan NM, Chatterjee A, Van Vliet MM, Powell SG, Rosen JM, Nigriny JF.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 May;131(5):953-61. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182865a24. Review.

PMID:
23629077
13.

Unilateral preoperative chest wall irradiation in bilateral tissue expander breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: a prospective outcomes analysis.

Weichman KE, Cemal Y, Albornoz CR, McCarthy CM, Pusic AL, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 May;131(5):921-7. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31828659c1.

PMID:
23385983
14.

Applications of acellular dermal matrix in revision breast reconstruction surgery.

Spear SL, Sher SR, Al-Attar A, Pittman T.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jan;133(1):1-10. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000436810.88659.36.

PMID:
24105085
15.

Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database in 19,100 patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction: complication rates with acellular dermal matrix.

Ibrahim AM, Shuster M, Koolen PG, Kim K, Taghinia AH, Sinno HH, Lee BT, Lin SJ.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Nov;132(5):1057-66. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a3beec.

PMID:
24165587
16.

Infection following implant-based reconstruction in 1952 consecutive breast reconstructions: salvage rates and predictors of success.

Reish RG, Damjanovic B, Austen WG Jr, Winograd J, Liao EC, Cetrulo CL, Balkin DM, Colwell AS.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jun;131(6):1223-30. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31828bd377.

PMID:
23714788
17.

Immediate breast reconstruction using porcine acellular dermal matrix (Strattice™): long-term outcomes and complications.

Salzberg CA, Dunavant C, Nocera N.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Mar;66(3):323-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.10.015. Epub 2012 Nov 13.

PMID:
23153519
18.

Early complications and implant loss in implant-based breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix (Tecnoss Protexa®): a comparative study.

Potter S, Chambers A, Govindajulu S, Sahu A, Warr R, Cawthorn S.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan;41(1):113-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.08.016. Epub 2013 Aug 22.

PMID:
24011501
19.

Uneventful versus Successful Reconstruction and Outcome Pathways in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrices.

Qureshi AA, Broderick KP, Belz J, Funk S, Reaven N, Brandt KE, Tenenbaum MM, Margenthaler JA, Aft RL, Myckatyn TM.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Aug;138(2):173e-83e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002402.

PMID:
27465177
20.

Vicryl mesh in expander/implant breast reconstruction: long-term follow-up in 38 patients.

Haynes DF, Kreithen JC.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Nov;134(5):892-9. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000610.

PMID:
25347625

Supplemental Content

Support Center