Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 150

1.

Nasal aesthetics: a cross-cultural analysis.

Broer PN, Buonocore S, Morillas A, Liu J, Tanna N, Walker M, Ng R, Persing JA.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Dec;130(6):843e-850e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826da0c1. Erratum in: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 May;131(5):1208. Ng, Ruben [corrected to Ng, Reuben].

PMID:
23190836
2.

The impact of geographic, ethnic, and demographic dynamics on the perception of beauty.

Broer PN, Juran S, Liu YJ, Weichman K, Tanna N, Walker ME, Ng R, Persing JA.

J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(2):e157-61. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000406.

PMID:
24621757
3.

Nasal aesthetics: a cross-cultural analysis.

Persichetti P, Cogliandro A, Barone M.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Oct;132(4):664e-665e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829fe201. No abstract available.

PMID:
24076715
4.

Reply: Nasal aesthetics: a cross-cultural analysis.

Broer PN.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Oct;132(4):665e-666e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a05302. No abstract available.

PMID:
24076716
5.

Aesthetic breast shape preferences among plastic surgeons.

Broer PN, Juran S, Walker ME, Ng R, Weichman K, Tanna N, Liu YJ, Shah A, Patel A, Persing JA, Thomson JG.

Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Jun;74(6):639-44. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000001.

PMID:
24691316
6.

A comparison of aesthetic proportions between the healthy Caucasian nose and the aesthetic ideal.

Leong SC, White PS.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(3):248-52.

PMID:
16673536
7.

Anthropometric analysis of the female Latino nose. Revised aesthetic concepts and their surgical implications.

Milgrim LM, Lawson W, Cohen AF.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996 Oct;122(10):1079-86.

PMID:
8859120
8.

The ideal nasolabial angle in rhinoplasty: a preference analysis of the general population.

Sinno HH, Markarian MK, Ibrahim AM, Lin SJ.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Aug;134(2):201-10. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000385.

PMID:
25068320
9.

Panel and patient perceptions of nasal aesthetics after secondary cleft rhinoplasty with versus without columellar grafting.

Pitak-Arnnop P, Hemprich A, Dhanuthai K, Yildirim V, Pausch NC.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2011 Jul;39(5):319-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2010.07.007. Epub 2010 Sep 15.

PMID:
20832328
10.

Indian American rhinoplasty: an emerging ethnic group.

Patel SM, Daniel RK.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Mar;129(3):519e-527e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182402d69.

PMID:
22374001
11.

Lip Attractiveness: A Cross-Cultural Analysis.

Heidekrueger PI, Szpalski C, Weichman K, Juran S, Ng R, Claussen C, Ninkovic M, Broer PN.

Aesthet Surg J. 2017 Jul 1;37(7):828-836. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw168.

PMID:
27677824
12.

[Long-term aesthetic results of rhinoplasty in congenital nose deformities--comparison of surgeon's and patient's evaluation].

Pisera P, Antoszewski B, Fijałkowska M, Kasielska A, Iljin A.

Otolaryngol Pol. 2012 Jul-Aug;66(4):280-4. Epub 2012 May 4. Polish.

PMID:
22890533
13.

Nasal shape and gender of the observer: implications for rhinoplasty.

Springer IN, Zernial O, Warnke PH, Wiltfang J, Russo PA, Wolfart S.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009 Jan;37(1):3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2008.04.001. Epub 2008 May 16.

PMID:
18485721
14.

Versatility of three-dimensional total alar cartilage dissection in aesthetic rhinoplasty.

Yun IS, Rah DK, Kim SM.

J Craniofac Surg. 2010 Nov;21(6):1922-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181f4ed97.

PMID:
21119456
15.

Preferences for the white female nasal supratip break.

McArdle A, Young R, Kelly MH.

Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Apr;68(4):366-8. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31823f3ca1.

PMID:
22421480
16.

Functional and aesthetic concerns of patients seeking revision rhinoplasty.

Yu K, Kim A, Pearlman SJ.

Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2010 Sep-Oct;12(5):291-7. doi: 10.1001/archfacial.2010.62.

PMID:
20855769
17.

Nasal tip plasty using various techniques in rhinoplasty.

Lee KC, Kwon YS, Park JM, Kim SK, Park SH, Kim JH.

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2004 Nov-Dec;28(6):445-55. Epub 2004 Dec 2.

PMID:
15580432
18.

Rhinoplasty: a practical guide for surgical planning.

Byrd HS, Hobar PC.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993 Apr;91(4):642-54; discussion 655-6.

PMID:
8446718
19.

Importance of the nasal-to-cervical relationship to the profile in rhinoplasty surgery.

Greer SE, Matarasso A, Wallach SG, Simon G, Longaker MT.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Aug;108(2):522-31; discussion 532-5.

PMID:
11496199
20.

Aesthetic comparison of the ideal nasal radix height in Brazilians.

Gomes GA, Tomita S, Guimarães GS, Lima CF, Mosciaro MS, Simas TB.

Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Jun;77(3):334-40. English, Portuguese.

Supplemental Content

Support Center