Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 93

1.

False alarms and pseudo-epidemics: the limitations of observational epidemiology.

Grimes DA, Schulz KF.

Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Oct;120(4):920-7.

PMID:
22996110
2.

Effect of formal statistical significance on the credibility of observational associations.

Ioannidis JP.

Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Aug 15;168(4):374-83; discussion 384-90. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn156. Review.

PMID:
18611956
3.
4.

Effects of short-term exposure to air pollution on hospital admissions of young children for acute lower respiratory infections in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

HEI Collaborative Working Group on Air Pollution, Poverty, and Health in Ho Chi Minh City., Le TG, Ngo L, Mehta S, Do VD, Thach TQ, Vu XD, Nguyen DT, Cohen A.

Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2012 Jun;(169):5-72; discussion 73-83.

PMID:
22849236
5.

Oral contraceptive use and cardiovascular disease: is the relationship real or due to study bias?

Katerndahl DA, Realini JP, Cohen PA.

J Fam Pract. 1992 Aug;35(2):147-57.

PMID:
1386621
7.

On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.

Shahar E, Shahar DJ.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Dec;15(6):1214-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01347.x.

PMID:
20367730
8.

Induced abortion and risk for breast cancer: reporting (recall) bias in a Dutch case-control study.

Rookus MA, van Leeuwen FE.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996 Dec 4;88(23):1759-64.

PMID:
8944006
9.

Bias and causal associations in observational research.

Grimes DA, Schulz KF.

Lancet. 2002 Jan 19;359(9302):248-52.

PMID:
11812579
10.

Selection bias in observational and experimental studies.

Ellenberg JH.

Stat Med. 1994 Mar 15-Apr 15;13(5-7):557-67. Review.

PMID:
8023035
11.

Meta-analyses of observational and genetic association studies of folate intakes or levels and breast cancer risk.

Lewis SJ, Harbord RM, Harris R, Smith GD.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Nov 15;98(22):1607-22.

PMID:
17105984
12.

Addressing the issue of channeling bias in observational studies with propensity scores analysis.

Lobo FS, Wagner S, Gross CR, Schommer JC.

Res Social Adm Pharm. 2006 Mar;2(1):143-51.

PMID:
17138506
13.

Overview of clinical research design.

Hartung DM, Touchette D.

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009 Feb 15;66(4):398-408. doi: 10.2146/ajhp080300.

PMID:
19202050
14.

Epidemiologic studies: pitfalls in interpretation.

Westhoff CL.

Dialogues Contracept. 1995 Winter;4(5):5-6, 8.

PMID:
12288680
15.

Observational studies in radiology.

Blackmore CC, Cummings P.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Nov;183(5):1203-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
15505278
16.

"Just Another Statistic"

Machtay M, Glatstein E.

Oncologist. 1998;3(3):III-IV.

PMID:
10388105
17.

Implications of M bias in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study.

Liu W, Brookhart MA, Schneeweiss S, Mi X, Setoguchi S.

Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Nov 15;176(10):938-48. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws165.

PMID:
23100247
18.
19.

A guide for assessing pharmacoepidemiologic studies.

Levine MA.

Pharmacotherapy. 1992;12(3):232-7.

PMID:
1608857
20.

Does hormone replacement therapy cause breast cancer? An application of causal principles to three studies: part 3. The Women's Health Initiative: unopposed estrogen.

Shapiro S, Farmer RD, Mueck AO, Seaman H, Stevenson JC.

J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2011 Oct;37(4):225-30. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2011-0091.

PMID:
21642263

Supplemental Content

Support Center