Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 161

1.

Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional clamping and suturing for vaginal hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial.

Lakeman MM, The S, Schellart RP, Dietz V, ter Haar JF, Thurkow A, Scholten PC, Dijkgraaf MG, Roovers JP.

BJOG. 2012 Nov;119(12):1473-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03484.x. Epub 2012 Aug 24.

2.

Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional clamping and suturing for total abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized trial.

Lakeman M, Kruitwagen RF, Vos MC, Roovers JP.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Sep-Oct;15(5):547-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.05.011. Epub 2008 Jul 10.

PMID:
18619923
3.

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing technique: a randomized controlled trial.

Allam IS, Makled AK, Gomaa IA, El Bishry GM, Bayoumy HA, Ali DF.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;291(6):1341-5. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3571-3. Epub 2014 Dec 19.

PMID:
25524534
4.

Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional clamping and suturing for vaginal hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial.

Lakeman MM, Roovers JP.

BJOG. 2013 May;120(6):777. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12163. No abstract available.

5.

Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional clamping and suturing for vaginal hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial.

Soreefan AH, Beebeejaun MS.

BJOG. 2013 May;120(6):776-7. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12162. No abstract available.

6.

A randomised controlled trial comparing abdominal and vaginal prolapse surgery: effects on urogenital function.

Roovers JP, van der Vaart CH, van der Bom JG, van Leeuwen JH, Scholten PC, Heintz AP.

BJOG. 2004 Jan;111(1):50-6.

7.

A long-term prospective study to compare the effects of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy on micturition and defecation.

Lakeman MM, van der Vaart CH, Roovers JP.

BJOG. 2011 Nov;118(12):1511-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03080.x. Epub 2011 Aug 22.

8.

Randomized study of bipolar vessel sealing system versus conventional suture ligature for vaginal hysterectomy.

Silva-Filho AL, Rodrigues AM, Vale de Castro Monteiro M, da Rosa DG, Pereira e Silva YM, Werneck RA, Bavoso N, Triginelli SA.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Oct;146(2):200-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.03.014. Epub 2009 Apr 19.

PMID:
19380188
9.

Bipolar coagulation with the BiClamp forceps versus conventional suture ligation: a multicenter randomized controlled trial in 175 vaginal hysterectomy patients.

Zubke W, Hornung R, Wässerer S, Hucke J, Füllers U, Werner C, Schmitz P, Lobodasch K, Hammermüller U, Wojdat R, Volz J, De Wilde RL, Wallwiener D.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Nov;280(5):753-60. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1010-7. Epub 2009 Feb 28.

PMID:
19252920
10.
11.

[Postoperative pain after hysterectomy through vaginal routes using electro surgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional suture ligature].

Douay N, Belot F, Bader G, Guyot B, Heitz D, Fauconnier A.

Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2007 Jul-Aug;35(7-8):632-6. Epub 2007 Jun 22. French.

PMID:
17587630
12.

Safety and efficacy of using the LigaSure vessel sealing system for securing the pedicles in vaginal hysterectomy: randomised controlled trial.

Hefni MA, Bhaumik J, El-Toukhy T, Kho P, Wong I, Abdel-Razik T, Davies AE.

BJOG. 2005 Mar;112(3):329-33.

13.

[Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].

Hu CD, Chen YS, Yi XF, Ding JX, Feng WW, Yao LQ, Huang J, Zhang Y, Hu WG, Zhu ZL, Hua KQ.

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Feb;46(2):94-100. Chinese.

PMID:
21426765
14.

Efficacy of using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy in patients with different degrees of operative difficulty: a randomised controlled trial.

Elhao M, Abdallah K, Serag I, El-Laithy M, Agur W.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Nov;147(1):86-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.07.011. Epub 2009 Sep 2.

PMID:
19729238
15.

Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy.

Cronjé HS, de Coning EC.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Dec;91(3):243-5. Epub 2005 Oct 21.

PMID:
16243338
16.

[The use of ThermoStapler--bipolar vessel sealing system in vaginal hysterectomy].

Malinowski A, Pawłowska N, Wojciechowski M.

Ginekol Pol. 2008 Dec;79(12):850-5. Polish.

PMID:
19175042
17.

[Uterus preserving surgery versus vaginal hysterectomy in treatment of uterine descent: a systematic review].

Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Vierhout ME, van Eijndhoven HW.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155(42):A3623. Review. Dutch.

PMID:
22027462
18.

General or Spinal Anaesthetic for Vaginal Surgery in Pelvic Floor Disorders (GOSSIP): a feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Purwar B, Ismail KM, Turner N, Farrell A, Verzune M, Annappa M, Smith I, El-Gizawy Z, Cooper JC.

Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Aug;26(8):1171-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2670-4. Epub 2015 Mar 20.

PMID:
25792351
19.

Single-port compared with conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Chen YJ, Wang PH, Ocampo EJ, Twu NF, Yen MS, Chao KC.

Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;117(4):906-12. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820c666a.

PMID:
21422864
20.

Unclear whether energy-based vessel sealing in vaginal hysterectomy is superior to conventional clamping and suturing.

Kroft J, Selk A.

Evid Based Med. 2013 Oct;18(5):180-1. doi: 10.1136/eb-2012-101172. Epub 2013 Feb 14. No abstract available.

PMID:
23412584

Supplemental Content

Support Center