Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 93

1.

Emphysema quantification by low-dose CT: potential impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction using 3D processing.

Nishio M, Matsumoto S, Ohno Y, Sugihara N, Inokawa H, Yoshikawa T, Sugimura K.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Sep;199(3):595-601. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.8174.

PMID:
22915399
2.

Emphysema quantification on low-dose CT using percentage of low-attenuation volume and size distribution of low-attenuation lung regions: effects of adaptive iterative dose reduction using 3D processing.

Nishio M, Matsumoto S, Seki S, Koyama H, Ohno Y, Fujisawa Y, Sugihara N, Yoshikawa T, Sugimura K.

Eur J Radiol. 2014 Dec;83(12):2268-76.

PMID:
25445899
3.

Iterative reconstruction for quantitative computed tomography analysis of emphysema: consistent results using different tube currents.

Yamashiro T, Miyara T, Honda O, Tomiyama N, Ohno Y, Noma S, Murayama S.

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Feb 11;10:321-7. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S74810.

4.

Emphysema Quantification Using Ultralow-Dose CT With Iterative Reconstruction and Filtered Back Projection.

Nishio M, Koyama H, Ohno Y, Negi N, Seki S, Yoshikawa T, Sugimura K.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Jun;206(6):1184-92. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15684.

PMID:
27058307
5.

Ultralow-radiation-dose chest CT: accuracy for lung densitometry and emphysema detection.

Wang R, Sui X, Schoepf UJ, Song W, Xue H, Jin Z, Schmidt B, Flohr TG, Canstein C, Spearman JV, Chen J, Meinel FG.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Apr;204(4):743-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13101.

PMID:
25794063
6.

Adaptive iterative dose reduction using 3D processing for reduced- and low-dose pulmonary CT: comparison with standard-dose CT for image noise reduction and radiological findings.

Ohno Y, Takenaka D, Kanda T, Yoshikawa T, Matsumoto S, Sugihara N, Sugimura K.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Oct;199(4):W477-85.

PMID:
22997397
7.
8.

Short-term reproducibility of computed tomography-based lung density measurements in alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency and smokers with emphysema.

Shaker SB, Dirksen A, Laursen LC, Maltbaek N, Christensen L, Sander U, Seersholm N, Skovgaard LT, Nielsen L, Kok-Jensen A.

Acta Radiol. 2004 Jul;45(4):424-30.

PMID:
15323395
9.

Feasibility of radiation dose reduction using AIDR-3D in dynamic pulmonary CT perfusion.

Mirsadraee S, Weir NW, Connolly S, Murchison JT, Reid JH, Hirani N, Connell M, van Beek EJ.

Clin Radiol. 2015 Aug;70(8):844-51. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.04.004.

PMID:
26005001
10.

Effects of CT section thickness and reconstruction kernel on emphysema quantification relationship to the magnitude of the CT emphysema index.

Gierada DS, Bierhals AJ, Choong CK, Bartel ST, Ritter JH, Das NA, Hong C, Pilgram TK, Bae KT, Whiting BR, Woods JC, Hogg JC, Lutey BA, Battafarano RJ, Cooper JD, Meyers BF, Patterson GA.

Acad Radiol. 2010 Feb;17(2):146-56. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.08.007.

11.

Dose reduction in chest CT: comparison of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.

Yamada Y, Jinzaki M, Hosokawa T, Tanami Y, Sugiura H, Abe T, Kuribayashi S.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Dec;81(12):4185-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.07.013.

PMID:
22883532
12.

Standard dose versus low-dose abdominal and pelvic CT: comparison between filtered back projection versus adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D.

Gervaise A, Osemont B, Louis M, Lecocq S, Teixeira P, Blum A.

Diagn Interv Imaging. 2014 Jan;95(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2013.05.005.

13.

Comparison of standard- and low-radiation-dose CT for quantification of emphysema.

Gierada DS, Pilgram TK, Whiting BR, Hong C, Bierhals AJ, Kim JH, Bae KT.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Jan;188(1):42-7.

PMID:
17179344
14.

Impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D on low-dose abdominal CT: comparison with routine-dose CT using filtered back projection.

Matsuki M, Murakami T, Juri H, Yoshikawa S, Narumi Y.

Acta Radiol. 2013 Oct;54(8):869-75. doi: 10.1177/0284185113488576.

PMID:
23761554
15.

The effects of radiation dose and CT manufacturer on measurements of lung densitometry.

Yuan R, Mayo JR, Hogg JC, Paré PD, McWilliams AM, Lam S, Coxson HO.

Chest. 2007 Aug;132(2):617-23.

PMID:
17573501
16.

Qualitative and quantitative assessment of smoking-related lung disease: effect of iterative reconstruction on low-dose computed tomographic examinations.

Hague CJ, Krowchuk N, Alhassan D, Ho K, Leipsic J, Sin DD, Mayo JR, Coxson HO.

J Thorac Imaging. 2014 Nov;29(6):350-6. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000118.

PMID:
25314025
17.

Spiral CT evaluation of pulmonary emphysema using a low-dose technique.

Zompatori M, Fasano L, Mazzoli M, Sciascia N, Cavina M, Pacilli AM, Paioli D.

Radiol Med. 2002 Jul-Aug;104(1-2):13-24. English, Italian.

PMID:
12386552
18.

The effect of iterative reconstruction on computed tomography assessment of emphysema, air trapping and airway dimensions.

Mets OM, Willemink MJ, de Kort FP, Mol CP, Leiner T, Oudkerk M, Prokop M, de Jong PA.

Eur Radiol. 2012 Oct;22(10):2103-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2489-z.

19.

Computed tomography of the chest with model-based iterative reconstruction using a radiation exposure similar to chest X-ray examination: preliminary observations.

Neroladaki A, Botsikas D, Boudabbous S, Becker CD, Montet X.

Eur Radiol. 2013 Feb;23(2):360-6. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2627-7.

PMID:
22892722
20.

Robust, standardized quantification of pulmonary emphysema in low dose CT exams.

Ceresa M, Bastarrika G, de Torres JP, Montuenga LM, Zulueta JJ, Ortiz-de-Solorzano C, Muñoz-Barrutia A.

Acad Radiol. 2011 Nov;18(11):1382-90. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.06.015.

PMID:
21852160
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center