Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 1038

1.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel VR, Stolzenburg JU, Van der Poel H, Wilson TG, Zattoni F, Mottrie A.

Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):405-17. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045. Epub 2012 Jun 1. Review.

PMID:
22749852
2.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE, Costello A, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Menon M, Mottrie A, Patel VR, Van der Poel H, Rosen RC, Tewari AK, Wilson TG, Zattoni F, Montorsi F.

Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):418-30. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.046. Epub 2012 Jun 1. Review.

PMID:
22749850
3.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Costello A, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Shariat SF, Stolzenburg JU, Van Poppel H, Zattoni F, Montorsi F, Mottrie A, Wilson TG.

Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):431-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.044. Epub 2012 Jun 2. Review.

PMID:
22749853
4.

Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel V, Rassweiler J, Van Poppel H.

Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1037-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.036. Epub 2009 Jan 25. Review.

PMID:
19185977
5.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S, Ahlering TE, Carroll PR, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Menon M, Patel VR, Shariat SF, Tewari AK, Van Poppel H, Zattoni F, Montorsi F, Mottrie A, Rosen RC, Wilson TG.

Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):382-404. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.047. Epub 2012 Jun 2. Review.

PMID:
22749851
6.

Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic.

Kim SC, Song C, Kim W, Kang T, Park J, Jeong IG, Lee S, Cho YM, Ahn H.

Eur Urol. 2011 Sep;60(3):413-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 May 17.

PMID:
21612859
7.

Posterior musculofascial reconstruction after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of the literature.

Rocco B, Cozzi G, Spinelli MG, Coelho RF, Patel VR, Tewari A, Wiklund P, Graefen M, Mottrie A, Gaboardi F, Gill IS, Montorsi F, Artibani W, Rocco F.

Eur Urol. 2012 Nov;62(5):779-90. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.041. Epub 2012 May 30. Review.

PMID:
22664219
8.

Randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Porpiglia F, Morra I, Lucci Chiarissi M, Manfredi M, Mele F, Grande S, Ragni F, Poggio M, Fiori C.

Eur Urol. 2013 Apr;63(4):606-14. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Jul 20.

PMID:
22840353
9.

Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.

Ludovico GM, Dachille G, Pagliarulo G, D'Elia C, Mondaini N, Gacci M, Detti B, Malossini G, Bartoletti R, Cai T.

Oncol Rep. 2013 Jun;29(6):2445-50. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2365. Epub 2013 Mar 26.

PMID:
23545628
10.

[Comparison of initial results with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy].

Otsuki H, Kuwahara Y, Nakamura K, Tsukamoto T.

Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2013 Sep;104(5):635-43. Japanese.

PMID:
24187850
11.

Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers.

Coelho RF, Rocco B, Patel MB, Orvieto MA, Chauhan S, Ficarra V, Melegari S, Palmer KJ, Patel VR.

J Endourol. 2010 Dec;24(12):2003-15. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0295. Epub 2010 Oct 13. Review.

12.

Systematic review of methods for reporting combined outcomes after radical prostatectomy and proposal of a novel system: the survival, continence, and potency (SCP) classification.

Ficarra V, Sooriakumaran P, Novara G, Schatloff O, Briganti A, Van der Poel H, Montorsi F, Patel V, Tewari A, Mottrie A.

Eur Urol. 2012 Mar;61(3):541-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.11.042. Epub 2011 Dec 2. Review.

PMID:
22153926
13.

Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA, Sivaraman A, Palmer KJ, Coughlin G, Patel VR.

Eur Urol. 2011 Jan;59(1):72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.025. Epub 2010 Aug 20.

PMID:
20801579
14.

Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.

Trinh QD, Sammon J, Sun M, Ravi P, Ghani KR, Bianchi M, Jeong W, Shariat SF, Hansen J, Schmitges J, Jeldres C, Rogers CG, Peabody JO, Montorsi F, Menon M, Karakiewicz PI.

Eur Urol. 2012 Apr;61(4):679-85. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.027. Epub 2011 Dec 22.

PMID:
22206800
15.

Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel.

Montorsi F, Wilson TG, Rosen RC, Ahlering TE, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A, Eastham JA, Ficarra V, Guazzoni G, Menon M, Novara G, Patel VR, Stolzenburg JU, Van der Poel H, Van Poppel H, Mottrie A; Pasadena Consensus Panel.

Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):368-81. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.057. Epub 2012 Jun 7. Review.

PMID:
22763081
16.

Balancing continence function and oncological outcomes during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Mottrie A, Gallina A, De Wil P, Thüer D, Novara G, Ficarra V.

BJU Int. 2011 Sep;108(6 Pt 2):999-1006. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10529.x. Review.

17.

Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis.

Rocco B, Matei DV, Melegari S, Ospina JC, Mazzoleni F, Errico G, Mastropasqua M, Santoro L, Detti S, de Cobelli O.

BJU Int. 2009 Oct;104(7):991-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08532.x. Epub 2009 May 5.

18.

Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes.

Kowalczyk KJ, Huang AC, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Yu HY, Ulmer WD, Kaplan JR, Patel S, Nguyen PL, Hu JC.

Eur Urol. 2011 Sep;60(3):536-47. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 May 17.

PMID:
21620561
19.

Total Anatomical Reconstruction During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications on Early Recovery of Urinary Continence.

Porpiglia F, Bertolo R, Manfredi M, De Luca S, Checcucci E, Morra I, Passera R, Fiori C.

Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):485-95. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Aug 19.

20.

[Critical comparative analysis between open, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: urinary continence and sexual function (part II)].

Romero Otero J, Martínez-Salamanca JI.

Arch Esp Urol. 2007 Sep;60(7):767-76. Review. Spanish.

PMID:
17937336

Supplemental Content

Support Center