Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 60

1.

Review of tissue simulating phantoms with controllable optical, mechanical and structural properties for use in optical coherence tomography.

Lamouche G, Kennedy BF, Kennedy KM, Bisaillon CE, Curatolo A, Campbell G, Pazos V, Sampson DD.

Biomed Opt Express. 2012 Jun 1;3(6):1381-98. doi: 10.1364/BOE.3.001381. Epub 2012 May 15.

2.

Fibrin phantom for use in optical coherence tomography.

Kennedy BF, Loitsch S, McLaughlin RA, Scolaro L, Rigby P, Sampson DD.

J Biomed Opt. 2010 May-Jun;15(3):030507. doi: 10.1117/1.3427249.

PMID:
20614992
3.

Two applications of solid phantoms in performance assessment of optical coherence tomography systems.

Avanaki MR, Podoleanu AG, Price MC, Corr SA, Hojjatoleslami SA.

Appl Opt. 2013 Oct 10;52(29):7054-61. doi: 10.1364/AO.52.007054.

PMID:
24217720
5.

Anti-biofouling conducting polymer nanoparticles as a label-free optical contrast agent for high resolution subsurface biomedical imaging.

Au KM, Lu Z, Matcher SJ, Armes SP.

Biomaterials. 2013 Nov;34(35):8925-40. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.094. Epub 2013 Aug 19.

PMID:
23968854
6.

Optical phantoms of varying geometry based on thin building blocks with controlled optical properties.

de Bruin DM, Bremmer RH, Kodach VM, de Kinkelder R, van Marle J, van Leeuwen TG, Faber DJ.

J Biomed Opt. 2010 Mar-Apr;15(2):025001. doi: 10.1117/1.3369003.

PMID:
20459242
7.

Deformable and durable phantoms with controlled density of scatterers.

Bisaillon CE, Lamouche G, Maciejko R, Dufour M, Monchalin JP.

Phys Med Biol. 2008 Jul 7;53(13):N237-47. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/13/N01. Epub 2008 Jun 17.

PMID:
18560050
8.

Optical coherence tomography to detect and manage retinal disease and glaucoma.

Jaffe GJ, Caprioli J.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Jan;137(1):156-69. Review.

PMID:
14700659
9.

Quantitative evaluation of scattering in optical coherence tomography skin images using the extended Huygens-Fresnel theorem.

Avanaki MR, Podoleanu AG, Schofield JB, Jones C, Sira M, Liu Y, Hojjat A.

Appl Opt. 2013 Mar 10;52(8):1574-80. doi: 10.1364/AO.52.001574.

PMID:
23478759
10.
11.

Structured three-dimensional optical phantom for optical coherence tomography.

Curatolo A, Kennedy BF, Sampson DD.

Opt Express. 2011 Sep 26;19(20):19480-5. doi: 10.1364/OE.19.019480.

PMID:
21996888
12.

Imaging thermally damaged tissue by Polarization Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography.

De Boer J, Srinivas S, Malekafzali A, Chen Z, Nelson J.

Opt Express. 1998 Sep 14;3(6):212-8.

PMID:
19384363
13.

Extraction of optical scattering parameters and attenuation compensation in optical coherence tomography images of multilayered tissue structures.

Thrane L, Frosz MH, Jørgensen TM, Tycho A, Yura HT, Andersen PE.

Opt Lett. 2004 Jul 15;29(14):1641-3.

PMID:
15309845
14.

Texture analysis of speckle in optical coherence tomography images of tissue phantoms.

Gossage KW, Smith CM, Kanter EM, Hariri LP, Stone AL, Rodriguez JJ, Williams SK, Barton JK.

Phys Med Biol. 2006 Mar 21;51(6):1563-75. Epub 2006 Mar 1.

PMID:
16510963
15.

Monte Carlo modeling of optical coherence tomography imaging through turbid media.

Lu Q, Gan X, Gu M, Luo Q.

Appl Opt. 2004 Mar 10;43(8):1628-37.

PMID:
15046164
16.

Functional imaging of dye concentration in tissue phantoms by spectroscopic optical coherence tomography.

Støren T, Røyset A, Svaasand LO, Lindmo T.

J Biomed Opt. 2005 Mar-Apr;10(2):024037.

PMID:
15910110
17.

Evaluating elastic properties of heterogeneous soft tissue by surface acoustic waves detected by phase-sensitive optical coherence tomography.

Li C, Guan G, Li S, Huang Z, Wang RK.

J Biomed Opt. 2012 May;17(5):057002. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.5.057002.

PMID:
22612141
19.
20.

Artery phantoms for intravascular optical coherence tomography: healthy arteries.

Bisaillon CÉ, Dufour ML, Lamouche G.

Biomed Opt Express. 2011 Sep 1;2(9):2599-613. doi: 10.1364/BOE.2.002599. Epub 2011 Aug 15.

Supplemental Content

Support Center