Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 125

1.

Predicting personalized multiple birth risks after in vitro fertilization-double embryo transfer.

Lannon BM, Choi B, Hacker MR, Dodge LE, Malizia BA, Barrett CB, Wong WH, Yao MW, Penzias AS.

Fertil Steril. 2012 Jul;98(1):69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.04.011. Epub 2012 Jun 4.

PMID:
22673597
2.

The cumulative probability of liveborn multiples after in vitro fertilization: a cohort study of more than 10,000 women.

Malizia BA, Dodge LE, Penzias AS, Hacker MR.

Fertil Steril. 2013 Feb;99(2):393-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.10.018. Epub 2012 Nov 8.

PMID:
23141053
3.

Prognostic value of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin is dependent on day of embryo transfer during in vitro fertilization.

Kathiresan AS, Cruz-Almeida Y, Barrionuevo MJ, Maxson WS, Hoffman DI, Weitzman VN, Christie DR, Manko GF, Ory SJ.

Fertil Steril. 2011 Dec;96(6):1362-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.042. Epub 2011 Nov 1.

PMID:
22047663
4.

Multiple gestations/pregnancies from IVF process in a fertility center in Nigeria, 2009-2011: implementing policy towards fewer (double and single) embryo transfer.

Olukoya OY, Okeke CC, Kemi AI, Ogbeche RO, Adewusi AJ, Ashiru OA.

Nig Q J Hosp Med. 2012 Apr-Jun;22(2):80-4.

PMID:
23175902
5.

Personalized prediction of first-cycle in vitro fertilization success.

Choi B, Bosch E, Lannon BM, Leveille MC, Wong WH, Leader A, Pellicer A, Penzias AS, Yao MW.

Fertil Steril. 2013 Jun;99(7):1905-11. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.016. Epub 2013 Mar 21.

PMID:
23522806
6.

The INeS study: prevention of multiple pregnancies: a randomised controlled trial comparing IUI COH versus IVF e SET versus MNC IVF in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility.

Bensdorp AJ, Slappendel E, Koks C, Oosterhuis J, Hoek A, Hompes P, Broekmans F, Verhoeve H, de Bruin JP, van Weert JM, Traas M, Maas J, Beckers N, Repping S, Mol BW, van der Veen F, van Wely M.

BMC Womens Health. 2009 Dec 18;9:35. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-9-35.

7.

Application of a validated prediction model for in vitro fertilization: comparison of live birth rates and multiple birth rates with 1 embryo transferred over 2 cycles vs 2 embryos in 1 cycle.

Luke B, Brown MB, Wantman E, Stern JE, Baker VL, Widra E, Coddington CC 3rd, Gibbons WE, Van Voorhis BJ, Ball GD.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;212(5):676.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

8.

The correlation between basal serum follicle-stimulating hormone levels before embryo cryopreservation and the clinical outcome of frozen embryo transfers.

Kassab A, Sabatini L, Tozer A, Zosmer A, Mostafa M, Al-Shawaf T.

Fertil Steril. 2009 Oct;92(4):1269-75. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.077. Epub 2008 Oct 17.

PMID:
18930194
9.

Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI.

Veleva Z, Karinen P, Tomás C, Tapanainen JS, Martikainen H.

Hum Reprod. 2009 Jul;24(7):1632-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep042. Epub 2009 Mar 24.

PMID:
19318704
10.
11.

[Factors related to occurrence of twin pregnancy after double-embryo transfer in vitro fertilization cycles].

Niu ZH, Feng Y, Zhang AJ, Zhang HQ, Sun YJ, Lu XW.

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Jun;44(6):413-7. Chinese.

PMID:
19953939
12.

Reducing the incidence of twins from IVF treatments: predictive modelling from a retrospective cohort.

Roberts SA, McGowan L, Mark Hirst W, Vail A, Rutherford A, Lieberman BA, Brison DR; towardSET Collaboration..

Hum Reprod. 2011 Mar;26(3):569-75. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq352. Epub 2010 Dec 16.

PMID:
21163856
13.

Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2004 results from the Canadian ART Register.

Gunby J, Bissonnette F, Librach C, Cowan L; IVF Directors Group of the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society..

Fertil Steril. 2008 May;89(5):1123-32. Epub 2007 Aug 13.

PMID:
17706210
14.

Ultrasonographer experience does not impact outcomes following ultrasound-guided embryo transfer.

Harris ID, Styer AK, Petrozza JC.

Fertil Steril. 2009 Sep;92(3):918-22. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.1743. Epub 2008 Sep 6.

PMID:
18774570
15.

The efficacy and adverse effects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.

Corabian P, Hailey D.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999 Winter;15(1):66-85. Review.

PMID:
10407597
16.

How effective is in vitro fertilization, and how can it be improved?

Stewart LM, Holman CD, Hart R, Finn J, Mai Q, Preen DB.

Fertil Steril. 2011 Apr;95(5):1677-83. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.130. Epub 2011 Feb 12.

PMID:
21316660
17.

Couples with unexplained subfertility and unfavorable prognosis: a randomized pilot trial comparing the effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with elective single embryo transfer versus intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian stimulation.

Custers IM, König TE, Broekmans FJ, Hompes PG, Kaaijk E, Oosterhuis J, Mochtar MH, Repping S, van Wely M, Steures P, van der Veen F, Mol BW.

Fertil Steril. 2011 Nov;96(5):1107-11.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Sep 3.

PMID:
21890134
18.

Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.

Lukassen HG, Braat DD, Wetzels AM, Zielhuis GA, Adang EM, Scheenjes E, Kremer JA.

Hum Reprod. 2005 Mar;20(3):702-8. Epub 2004 Dec 23.

PMID:
15618254
19.

Reducing twin pregnancy rates after IVF--elective single embryo transfer (eSET).

Milne P, Cottell E, Allen C, Spillane H, Vasallo J, Wingfield M.

Ir Med J. 2010 Jan;103(1):9-11.

PMID:
20222385
20.

Optimizing embryo selection with day 5 transfer.

Reh A, Fino E, Krey L, Berkeley A, Noyes N, Grifo J.

Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(2):609-15. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.070. Epub 2009 Apr 14.

PMID:
19368915

Supplemental Content

Support Center