Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 152

1.

The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution.

Tomato Genome Consortium.

Nature. 2012 May 30;485(7400):635-41. doi: 10.1038/nature11119.

2.

Exploring genetic variation in the tomato (Solanum section Lycopersicon) clade by whole-genome sequencing.

100 Tomato Genome Sequencing Consortium, Aflitos S, Schijlen E, de Jong H, de Ridder D, Smit S, Finkers R, Wang J, Zhang G, Li N, Mao L, Bakker F, Dirks R, Breit T, Gravendeel B, Huits H, Struss D, Swanson-Wagner R, van Leeuwen H, van Ham RC, Fito L, Guignier L, Sevilla M, Ellul P, Ganko E, Kapur A, Reclus E, de Geus B, van de Geest H, Te Lintel Hekkert B, van Haarst J, Smits L, Koops A, Sanchez-Perez G, van Heusden AW, Visser R, Quan Z, Min J, Liao L, Wang X, Wang G, Yue Z, Yang X, Xu N, Schranz E, Smets E, Vos R, Rauwerda J, Ursem R, Schuit C, Kerns M, van den Berg J, Vriezen W, Janssen A, Datema E, Jahrman T, Moquet F, Bonnet J, Peters S.

Plant J. 2014 Oct;80(1):136-48. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12616. Epub 2014 Sep 3.

3.

Evidence of cryptic introgression in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) based on wild tomato species alleles.

Labate JA, Robertson LD.

BMC Plant Biol. 2012 Aug 7;12:133. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-133.

4.

Analysis of 90 Mb of the potato genome reveals conservation of gene structures and order with tomato but divergence in repetitive sequence composition.

Zhu W, Ouyang S, Iovene M, O'Brien K, Vuong H, Jiang J, Buell CR.

BMC Genomics. 2008 Jun 13;9:286. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-286.

5.

Comparative BAC end sequence analysis of tomato and potato reveals overrepresentation of specific gene families in potato.

Datema E, Mueller LA, Buels R, Giovannoni JJ, Visser RG, Stiekema WJ, van Ham RC.

BMC Plant Biol. 2008 Apr 11;8:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-8-34.

6.

Overview of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) candidate pathogen recognition genes reveals important Solanum R locus dynamics.

Andolfo G, Sanseverino W, Rombauts S, Van de Peer Y, Bradeen JM, Carputo D, Frusciante L, Ercolano MR.

New Phytol. 2013 Jan;197(1):223-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04380.x. Epub 2012 Nov 19.

7.

Defining the full tomato NB-LRR resistance gene repertoire using genomic and cDNA RenSeq.

Andolfo G, Jupe F, Witek K, Etherington GJ, Ercolano MR, Jones JD.

BMC Plant Biol. 2014 May 5;14:120. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-120.

8.

The tomato genome: implications for plant breeding, genomics and evolution.

Ranjan A, Ichihashi Y, Sinha NR.

Genome Biol. 2012 Aug 30;13(8):167. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-8-167.

9.

Analysis of wild-species introgressions in tomato inbreds uncovers ancestral origins.

Menda N, Strickler SR, Edwards JD, Bombarely A, Dunham DM, Martin GB, Mejia L, Hutton SF, Havey MJ, Maxwell DP, Mueller LA.

BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Oct 28;14:287. doi: 10.1186/s12870-014-0287-2.

10.

A disease resistance locus on potato and tomato chromosome 4 exhibits a conserved multipartite structure displaying different rates of evolution in different lineages.

Destefanis M, Nagy I, Rigney B, Bryan GJ, McLean K, Hein I, Griffin D, Milbourne D.

BMC Plant Biol. 2015 Oct 24;15:255. doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0645-8.

11.
12.

Genome-wide association mapping in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is possible using genome admixture of Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme.

Ranc N, Muños S, Xu J, Le Paslier MC, Chauveau A, Bounon R, Rolland S, Bouchet JP, Brunel D, Causse M.

G3 (Bethesda). 2012 Aug;2(8):853-64. doi: 10.1534/g3.112.002667. Epub 2012 Aug 1.

13.

Genome-wide identification and functional analyses of calmodulin genes in Solanaceous species.

Zhao Y, Liu W, Xu YP, Cao JY, Braam J, Cai XZ.

BMC Plant Biol. 2013 Apr 27;13:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-70.

14.
15.

Sequence of the tomato chloroplast DNA and evolutionary comparison of solanaceous plastid genomes.

Kahlau S, Aspinall S, Gray JC, Bock R.

J Mol Evol. 2006 Aug;63(2):194-207. Epub 2006 Jul 7.

PMID:
16830097
16.

Evolutionary meta-analysis of solanaceous resistance gene and solanum resistance gene analog sequences and a practical framework for cross-species comparisons.

Quirin EA, Mann H, Meyer RS, Traini A, Chiusano ML, Litt A, Bradeen JM.

Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2012 May;25(5):603-12. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-12-11-0318-R.

17.

Arabidopsis genome sequence as a tool for functional genomics in tomato.

Mysore KS, Tuori RP, Martin GB.

Genome Biol. 2001;2(1):REVIEWS1003. Epub 2001 Jan 12. Review.

18.

Endogenous pararetroviral sequences in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and related species.

Staginnus C, Gregor W, Mette MF, Teo CH, Borroto-Fernández EG, Machado ML, Matzke M, Schwarzacher T.

BMC Plant Biol. 2007 May 21;7:24.

19.

Do potatoes and tomatoes have a single evolutionary history, and what proportion of the genome supports this history?

Rodriguez F, Wu F, Ané C, Tanksley S, Spooner DM.

BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Aug 7;9:191. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-191.

20.

The sugar transporter inventory of tomato: genome-wide identification and expression analysis.

Reuscher S, Akiyama M, Yasuda T, Makino H, Aoki K, Shibata D, Shiratake K.

Plant Cell Physiol. 2014 Jun;55(6):1123-41. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu052. Epub 2014 May 14.

PMID:
24833026

Supplemental Content

Support Center