Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 138

1.

Hebephilia and the construction of a fictitious diagnosis.

Good P, Burstein J.

J Nerv Ment Dis. 2012 Jun;200(6):492-4. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e318257c4f1.

PMID:
22652613
2.
3.

Hebephilia: quintessence of diagnostic pretextuality.

Franklin K.

Behav Sci Law. 2010 Nov-Dec;28(6):751-68. doi: 10.1002/bsl.934. Epub 2010 Apr 27.

PMID:
21110392
4.
5.

Commentary: inventing diagnosis for civil commitment of rapists.

Zander TK.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2008;36(4):459-69.

PMID:
19092062
6.

Issues for DSM-V: unintended consequences of small changes: the case of paraphilias.

First MB, Frances A.

Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Oct;165(10):1240-1. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08030361. No abstract available. Erratum in: Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Nov;165(11):1495.

PMID:
18829878
7.

Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V.

Blanchard R, Lykins AD, Wherrett D, Kuban ME, Cantor JM, Blak T, Dickey R, Klassen PE.

Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Jun;38(3):335-50. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9399-9. Epub 2008 Aug 7.

PMID:
18686026
8.

Use of DSM paraphilia diagnoses in sexually violent predator commitment cases.

First MB, Halon RL.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2008;36(4):443-54. Review.

PMID:
19092060
9.

A practical guide for the evaluation of sexual recidivism risk in mentally retarded sex offenders.

Phenix A, Sreenivasan S.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2009;37(4):509-24.

PMID:
20018999
10.

Phallometric diagnosis of pedophilia.

Freund K, Blanchard R.

J Consult Clin Psychol. 1989 Feb;57(1):100-5.

PMID:
2925958
11.

Commentary: muddy diagnostic waters in the SVP courtroom.

Prentky RA, Coward AI, Gabriel AM.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2008;36(4):455-8.

PMID:
19092061
12.

DSM-5 proposed diagnostic criteria for sexual paraphilias: tensions between diagnostic validity and forensic utility.

Wakefield JC.

Int J Law Psychiatry. 2011 May-Jun;34(3):195-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.04.012. Epub 2011 May 4. Review.

PMID:
21531463
13.

Examining the scope of questionable diagnostic reliability in Sexually Violent Predator (SVP) evaluations.

Perillo AD, Spada AH, Calkins C, Jeglic EL.

Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014 Mar-Apr;37(2):190-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.11.005. Epub 2013 Nov 22.

PMID:
24274914
14.

Scholarly, clinical, and legal questions concerning hebephilia, with particular reference to sexually violent predator civil commitment proceedings.

Blanchard R.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2012;40(1):157-8; author reply 158. No abstract available.

PMID:
22396353
15.

Mental disorder, predisposition, prediction, and ability to control: evaluating sex offenders for civil commitment.

Elwood RW.

Sex Abuse. 2009 Dec;21(4):395-411. doi: 10.1177/1079063209347723. Review.

PMID:
19901235
16.

Evidence of Construct Validity in the Assessment of Hebephilia.

Stephens S, Seto MC, Goodwill AM, Cantor JM.

Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Jan;46(1):301-309. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0907-z. Epub 2016 Nov 29.

PMID:
27900492
17.

Hebephilia is not a mental disorder in DSM-IV-TR and should not become one in DSM-5.

Frances A, First MB.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011;39(1):78-85.

PMID:
21389170
18.

Sensitivity and Specificity of the Phallometric Test for Hebephilia.

Cantor JM, McPhail IV.

J Sex Med. 2015 Sep;12(9):1940-50. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12970. Epub 2015 Aug 14.

PMID:
26272778
19.
20.

Comparing indicators of sexual sadism as predictors of recidivism among adult male sexual offenders.

Kingston DA, Seto MC, Firestone P, Bradford JM.

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Aug;78(4):574-84. doi: 10.1037/a0019734.

PMID:
20658813

Supplemental Content

Support Center