Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 62


Chapter 12: systematic review of prognostic tests.

Rector TS, Taylor BC, Wilt TJ.

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1:S94-101. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1899-y. Review.


Systematic Review of Prognostic Tests.

Rector TS, Taylor BC, Wilt TJ.

In: Chang SM, Matchar DB, Smetana GW, Umscheid CA, editors. Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Jun. Chapter 12.


Chapter 10: deciding whether to complement a systematic review of medical tests with decision modeling.

Trikalinos TA, Kulasingam S, Lawrence WF.

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1:S76-82. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2019-3.


Chapter 3: choosing the important outcomes for a systematic review of a medical test.

Segal JB.

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1:S20-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1802-x.


Challenges in systematic reviews of diagnostic technologies.

Tatsioni A, Zarin DA, Aronson N, Samson DJ, Flamm CR, Schmid C, Lau J.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1048-55. Review.


Chapter 11: challenges in and principles for conducting systematic reviews of genetic tests used as predictive indicators.

Jonas DE, Wilt TJ, Taylor BC, Wilkins TM, Matchar DB.

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1:S83-93. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1898-z.


Chapter 4: effective search strategies for systematic reviews of medical tests.

Relevo R.

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1:S28-32. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1873-8.


Chapter 6: assessing applicability of medical test studies in systematic reviews.

Hartmann KE, Matchar DB, Chang S.

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1:S39-46. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1961-9.


Chapter 5: assessing risk of bias as a domain of quality in medical test studies.

Santaguida PL, Riley CM, Matchar DB.

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1:S33-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2030-8.


Gynaecologists blaze the trail in primary studies and systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.

Johnson NP, Khan KS.

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Feb;49(1):71-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.00996.x.


Chapter 9: options for summarizing medical test performance in the absence of a "gold standard".

Trikalinos TA, Balion CM.

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1:S67-75. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2031-7.


Chapter 1: Introduction to the Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews.

Matchar DB.

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1:S4-10. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1798-2.


Systematic reviews in laboratory medicine: principles, processes and practical considerations.

Horvath AR, Pewsner D.

Clin Chim Acta. 2004 Apr;342(1-2):23-39. Review.


Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests in cancer: review of methods and reporting.

Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Halligan S, Hopewell S, Cornelius V, Altman DG.

BMJ. 2006 Aug 26;333(7565):413. Epub 2006 Jul 18. Review.


[Systematic reviews of studies of diagnostic test accuracy].

Moreno G G, Pantoja C T.

Rev Med Chil. 2009 Feb;137(2):303-7. doi: /S0034-98872009000200018. Epub 2009 Jun 10. Spanish. No abstract available.


Reporting of prognostic markers: current problems and development of guidelines for evidence-based practice in the future.

Riley RD, Abrams KR, Sutton AJ, Lambert PC, Jones DR, Heney D, Burchill SA.

Br J Cancer. 2003 Apr 22;88(8):1191-8.


Impact of adjustment for quality on results of metaanalyses of diagnostic accuracy.

Leeflang M, Reitsma J, Scholten R, Rutjes A, Di Nisio M, Deeks J, Bossuyt P.

Clin Chem. 2007 Feb;53(2):164-72. Epub 2006 Dec 21.


Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines.

Devillé WL, Buntinx F, Bouter LM, Montori VM, de Vet HC, van der Windt DA, Bezemer PD.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002 Jul 3;2:9.

Supplemental Content

Support Center