Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 142

1.

The effect of efavirenz versus nevirapine-containing regimens on immunologic, virologic and clinical outcomes in a prospective observational study.

Cain LE, Phillips A, Lodi S, Sabin C, Bansi L, Justice A, Tate J, Logan R, Robins JM, Sterne JA, van Sighem A, de Wolf F, Bucher HC, Elzi L, Touloumi G, Vourli G, Esteve A, Casabona J, del Amo J, Moreno S, Seng R, Meyer L, Pérez-Hoyos S, Muga R, Abgrall S, Costagliola D, Hernán MA; HIV-CAUSAL Collaboration..

AIDS. 2012 Aug 24;26(13):1691-705.

2.

Efavirenz versus boosted atazanavir-containing regimens and immunologic, virologic, and clinical outcomes: A prospective study of HIV-positive individuals.

Cain LE, Caniglia EC, Phillips A, Olson A, Muga R, Pérez-Hoyos S, Abgrall S, Costagliola D, Rubio R, Jarrín I, Bucher H, Fehr J, van Sighem A, Reiss P, Dabis F, Vandenhende MA, Logan R, Robins J, Sterne JA, Justice A, Tate J, Touloumi G, Paparizos V, Esteve A, Casabona J, Seng R, Meyer L, Jose S, Sabin C, Hernán MA; HIV-CAUSAL Collaboration..

Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Oct;95(41):e5133.

3.

Efavirenz versus nevirapine-based initial treatment of HIV infection: clinical and virological outcomes in Southern African adults.

Nachega JB, Hislop M, Dowdy DW, Gallant JE, Chaisson RE, Regensberg L, Maartens G.

AIDS. 2008 Oct 18;22(16):2117-25. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328310407e.

4.

Abacavir-based triple nucleoside regimens for maintenance therapy in patients with HIV.

Cruciani M, Mengoli C, Serpelloni G, Parisi SG, Malena M, Bosco O.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 5;(6):CD008270. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008270.pub2. Review.

PMID:
23740608
5.

Boosted lopinavir- versus boosted atazanavir-containing regimens and immunologic, virologic, and clinical outcomes: a prospective study of HIV-infected individuals in high-income countries.

HIV-CAUSAL Collaboration., Cain LE, Phillips A, Olson A, Sabin C, Jose S, Justice A, Tate J, Logan R, Robins JM, Sterne JA, van Sighem A, Reiss P, Young J, Fehr J, Touloumi G, Paparizos V, Esteve A, Casabona J, Monge S, Moreno S, Seng R, Meyer L, Pérez-Hoyos S, Muga R, Dabis F, Vandenhende MA, Abgrall S, Costagliola D, Hernán MA.

Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Apr 15;60(8):1262-8. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu1167. Epub 2015 Jan 6.

6.

Efavirenz versus nevirapine in current clinical practice: a prospective, open-label observational study.

Manfredi R, Calza L, Chiodo F.

J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004 Apr 15;35(5):492-502.

PMID:
15021314
7.

Resistance patterns selected by nevirapine vs. efavirenz in HIV-infected patients failing first-line antiretroviral treatment: a bayesian analysis.

Ngo-Giang-Huong N, Jourdain G, Amzal B, Sang-a-gad P, Lertkoonalak R, Eiamsirikit N, Tansuphasawasdikul S, Buranawanitchakorn Y, Yutthakasemsunt N, Mekviwattanawong S, McIntosh K, Lallemant M; Program for HIV Prevention and Treatment (PHPT) study group..

PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027427. Epub 2011 Nov 23.

8.

Viral load outcome of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor regimens for 2203 mainly antiretroviral-experienced patients.

Phillips AN, Pradier C, Lazzarin A, Clotet B, Goebel FD, Hermans P, Antunes F, Ledergerber B, Kirk O, Lundgren JD; EuroSIDA Study Group..

AIDS. 2001 Dec 7;15(18):2385-95.

PMID:
11740189
9.

A randomized trial comparing plasma drug concentrations and efficacies between 2 nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor-based regimens in HIV-infected patients receiving rifampicin: the N2R Study.

Manosuthi W, Sungkanuparph S, Tantanathip P, Lueangniyomkul A, Mankatitham W, Prasithsirskul W, Burapatarawong S, Thongyen S, Likanonsakul S, Thawornwa U, Prommool V, Ruxrungtham K; N2R Study Team..

Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jun 15;48(12):1752-9. doi: 10.1086/599114.

PMID:
19438397
10.

Lack of effect from a previous single dose of nevirapine on virologic and immunologic responses after 6 months of antiretroviral regimens containing either efavirenz or lopinavir-ritonavir.

Dlamini JN, Hu Z, Somaroo H, Highbarger HC, Follmann DA, Dewar RL, Pau AK.

Pharmacotherapy. 2011 Feb;31(2):158-63. doi: 10.1592/phco.31.2.158.

11.

Quality of life in patients treated with first-line antiretroviral therapy containing nevirapine or efavirenz in Uganda: a prospective non-randomized study.

Mwesigire DM, Wu AW, Martin F, Katamba A, Seeley J.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 28;15:292. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0959-0.

12.

Virological suppression at 6 months is related to choice of initial regimen in antiretroviral-naive patients: a cohort study.

Matthews GV, Sabin CA, Mandalia S, Lampe F, Phillips AN, Nelson MR, Bower M, Johnson MA, Gazzard BG.

AIDS. 2002 Jan 4;16(1):53-61.

PMID:
11741163
13.

Comparison of genotypic resistance profiles and virological response between patients starting nevirapine and efavirenz in EuroSIDA.

Bannister WP, Ruiz L, Cozzi-Lepri A, Mocroft A, Kirk O, Staszewski S, Loveday C, Karlsson A, Monforte Ad, Clotet B, Lundgren JD; EuroSIDA study group..

AIDS. 2008 Jan 30;22(3):367-76. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282f3cc35.

PMID:
18195563
14.

Higher virological effectiveness of NNRTI-based antiretroviral regimens containing nevirapine or efavirenz compared to a triple NRTI regimen as initial therapy in HIV-1-infected adults.

Pérez-Elías MJ, Moreno A, Moreno S, López D, Antela A, Casado JL, Dronda F, Gutiérrez C, Quereda C, Navas E, Abraira V, Rodríguez MA.

HIV Clin Trials. 2005 Nov-Dec;6(6):312-9.

PMID:
16452065
15.

A comparison of the long-term durability of nevirapine, efavirenz and lopinavir in routine clinical practice in Europe: a EuroSIDA study.

Reekie J, Reiss P, Ledergerber B, Sedlacek D, Parczewski M, Gatell J, Katlama C, Fätkenheuer G, Lundgren JD, Mocroft A; EuroSIDA study group..

HIV Med. 2011 May;12(5):259-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2010.00877.x. Epub 2010 Aug 31.

16.

Low-frequency K103N strengthens the impact of transmitted drug resistance on virologic responses to first-line efavirenz or nevirapine-based highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Geretti AM, Fox ZV, Booth CL, Smith CJ, Phillips AN, Johnson M, Li JF, Heneine W, Johnson JA.

J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009 Dec;52(5):569-73. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181ba11e8.

PMID:
19779307
17.

The relation between efavirenz versus nevirapine and virologic failure in Johannesburg, South Africa.

Shearer K, Brennan AT, Maskew M, Long L, Berhanu R, Sanne I, Fox MP.

J Int AIDS Soc. 2014 Oct 22;17:19065. doi: 10.7448/IAS.17.1.19065. eCollection 2014.

18.

Response to first protease inhibitor- and efavirenz-containing antiretroviral combination therapy. The Swiss HIV Cohort Study.

Friedl AC, Ledergerber B, Flepp M, Hirschel B, Telenti A, Furrer H, Bucher HC, Bernasconi E, Weber R; Swiss Cohort Study..

AIDS. 2001 Sep 28;15(14):1793-800.

PMID:
11579241
19.

Efficacy and tolerability of nevirapine- versus efavirenz-containing regimens in HIV-infected Thai children.

Lapphra K, Vanprapar N, Chearskul S, Phongsamart W, Chearskul P, Prasitsuebsai W, Chokephaibulkit K.

Int J Infect Dis. 2008 Nov;12(6):e33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2007.10.008. Epub 2008 Jun 24.

20.

Rilpivirine versus efavirenz with two background nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treatment-naive adults infected with HIV-1 (THRIVE): a phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial.

Cohen CJ, Andrade-Villanueva J, Clotet B, Fourie J, Johnson MA, Ruxrungtham K, Wu H, Zorrilla C, Crauwels H, Rimsky LT, Vanveggel S, Boven K; THRIVE study group..

Lancet. 2011 Jul 16;378(9787):229-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60983-5.

PMID:
21763935

Supplemental Content

Support Center