Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 103

1.

Preference for symmetry: only on mars?

Shepherd K, Bar M.

Perception. 2011;40(10):1254-6.

2.

Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces.

Little AC, Jones BC.

Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Sep 7;270(1526):1759-63.

3.

Facial aesthetics: babies prefer attractiveness to symmetry.

Samuels CA, Butterworth G, Roberts T, Graupner L, Hole G.

Perception. 2013;42(11):1244-52.

PMID:
24601036
4.

Similarities in human visual and declared measures of preference for opposite-sex faces.

Griffey JA, Little AC.

Exp Psychol. 2014;61(4):301-9. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000248.

PMID:
24351988
5.

The influence of symmetry on children's judgments of facial attractiveness.

Vingilis-Jaremko L, Maurer D.

Perception. 2013;42(3):302-20.

PMID:
23837207
6.

Dynamic stimuli: accentuating aesthetic preference biases.

Friedrich TE, Harms VL, Elias LJ.

Laterality. 2014;19(5):549-59. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2014.886585. Epub 2014 Feb 17.

PMID:
24527986
7.

Sex differences in neural mechanisms underlying implicit symmetry processing.

Lux S, Marshall JC, Neufang S, Fink GR.

Cortex. 2006 Aug;42(6):963-9.

PMID:
17131602
8.

Aesthetic preference in dextrals and sinistrals.

McLaughlin JP, Dean P, Stanley P.

Neuropsychologia. 1983;21(2):147-53. No abstract available.

PMID:
6866256
9.

Prism adaptation does not change the rightward spatial preference bias found with ambiguous stimuli in unilateral neglect.

Sarri M, Greenwood R, Kalra L, Driver J.

Cortex. 2011 Mar;47(3):353-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.01.006. Epub 2010 Jan 21.

10.

Looking time predicts choice but not aesthetic value.

Isham EA, Geng JJ.

PLoS One. 2013 Aug 16;8(8):e71698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071698. eCollection 2013.

11.

Averageness or symmetry: which is more important for facial attractiveness?

Komori M, Kawamura S, Ishihara S.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Jun;131(2):136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Apr 25.

PMID:
19394585
12.
13.

Symmetries in action: on the interactive nature of planning constraints for bimanual object manipulation.

Huhn JM 3rd, Schimpf KA, van der Wel RP.

Exp Brain Res. 2014 Dec;232(12):3919-27. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4077-8. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

PMID:
25160868
14.

Facial symmetry detection ability changes across the menstrual cycle.

Oinonen KA, Mazmanian D.

Biol Psychol. 2007 May;75(2):136-45. Epub 2007 Jan 25.

PMID:
17316956
15.

The pleasantness of visual symmetry: always, never or sometimes.

Pecchinenda A, Bertamini M, Makin AD, Ruta N.

PLoS One. 2014 Mar 21;9(3):e92685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092685. eCollection 2014.

16.

Presentation-order effects for aesthetic stimulus preference.

Englund MP, Hellström Å.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Oct;74(7):1499-511.

PMID:
22760928
17.

Birds of a feather... Generalization of facial structures following massive familiarization.

Tinio PP, Gerger G, Leder H.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Nov;144(3):463-71. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Sep 25.

PMID:
24076329
18.

Emotional valence modulates the preference for curved objects.

Leder H, Tinio PP, Bar M.

Perception. 2011;40(6):649-55.

PMID:
21936294
19.
20.

The Role of Visual Eccentricity on Preference for Abstract Symmetry.

Rampone G, O' Sullivan N, Bertamini M.

PLoS One. 2016 Apr 28;11(4):e0154428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154428. eCollection 2016.

Supplemental Content

Support Center