Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 158

1.

Comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

Wright JD, Burke WM, Wilde ET, Lewin SN, Charles AS, Kim JH, Goldman N, Neugut AI, Herzog TJ, Hershman DL.

J Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar 10;30(8):783-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.7508. Epub 2012 Jan 30.

2.

Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Neugut AI, Burke WM, Lu YS, Lewin SN, Hershman DL.

Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Oct;127(1):11-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.031. Epub 2012 Jun 24.

PMID:
22735788
3.
4.

Influence of surgical volume on outcome for laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

Wright JD, Hershman DL, Burke WM, Lu YS, Neugut AI, Lewin SN, Herzog TJ.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar;19(3):948-58. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2090-8. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

PMID:
21989660
5.

Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia.

Herling SF, Palle C, Møller AM, Thomsen T, Sørensen J.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Mar;95(3):299-308. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12820. Epub 2015 Dec 16.

PMID:
26575851
6.

Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?

Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Henretta MS, Kim KH, Carlson MJ, Phillips GS, Fowler JM.

Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Apr;113(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.12.005. Epub 2009 Jan 24.

PMID:
19168206
7.

Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.

Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Suttle AW, Hunt S.

Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Dec;111(3):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.022. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

PMID:
18829091
9.

Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery in morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients - a comparative analysis of total charges and complication rates.

Chan JK, Gardner AB, Taylor K, Thompson CA, Blansit K, Yu X, Kapp DS.

Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Nov;139(2):300-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Sep 10.

PMID:
26363212
10.

Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Endometrial Cancer Care: A Quality and Cost Disparity.

Fader AN, Weise RM, Sinno AK, Tanner EJ 3rd, Borah BJ, Moriarty JP, Bristow RE, Makary MA, Pronovost PJ, Hutfless S, Dowdy SC.

Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;127(1):91-100. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001180.

PMID:
26646127
11.

Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.

Corrado G, Cutillo G, Pomati G, Mancini E, Sperduti I, Patrizi L, Saltari M, Vincenzoni C, Baiocco E, Vizza E.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Aug;41(8):1074-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.04.020. Epub 2015 May 9.

PMID:
26002986
12.

Laparoscopic and robot-assisted hysterectomy for uterine cancer: a comparison of costs and complications.

Zakhari A, Czuzoj-Shulman N, Spence AR, Gotlieb WH, Abenhaim HA.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;213(5):665.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Jul 15.

PMID:
26188114
13.

An economic analysis of robotically assisted hysterectomy.

Wright JD, Ananth CV, Tergas AI, Herzog TJ, Burke WM, Lewin SN, Lu YS, Neugut AI, Hershman DL.

Obstet Gynecol. 2014 May;123(5):1038-48. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000244.

14.

Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.

Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, Burke WM, Lu YS, Neugut AI, Herzog TJ, Hershman DL.

JAMA. 2013 Feb 20;309(7):689-98. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.186.

PMID:
23423414
15.

Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer.

Desille-Gbaguidi H, Hebert T, Paternotte-Villemagne J, Gaborit C, Rush E, Body G.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Dec;171(2):348-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.09.025. Epub 2013 Sep 29.

PMID:
24135382
16.

Disparities in Surgical Care Among Women With Endometrial Cancer.

Mannschreck D, Matsuno RK, Moriarty JP, Borah BJ, Dowdy SC, Tanner EJ 3rd, Makary MA, Stone RL, Levinson KL, Temkin SM, Fader AN.

Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;128(3):526-34. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001567.

PMID:
27500330
17.

Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.

Wright JD, Burke WM, Tergas AI, Hou JY, Huang Y, Hu JC, Hillyer GC, Ananth CV, Neugut AI, Hershman DL.

J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 1;34(10):1087-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.3212. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

18.

Cost comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus standard laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Winter ML, Leu SY, Lagrew DC Jr, Bustillo G.

J Robot Surg. 2015 Dec;9(4):269-75. doi: 10.1007/s11701-015-0526-z. Epub 2015 Jul 30.

PMID:
26530837
19.

Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.

Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, Schaer G.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 May;150(1):92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Mar 5.

PMID:
20207063
20.

Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.

Catanzarite T, Saha S, Pilecki MA, Kim JY, Milad MP.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Sep-Oct;22(6):1049-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.05.022. Epub 2015 Jun 10.

PMID:
26070725

Supplemental Content

Support Center