Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 204

1.

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus da Vinci robotic hysterectomy: is using the robot beneficial?

Soto E, Lo Y, Friedman K, Soto C, Nezhat F, Chuang L, Gretz H.

J Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Dec;22(4):253-9. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2011.22.4.253. Epub 2011 Dec 5.

2.

A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.

Payne TN, Dauterive FR.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):286-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 6.

PMID:
18439499
3.

Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.

Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, Schaer G.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 May;150(1):92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Mar 5.

PMID:
20207063
4.

An analysis of the impact of previous laparoscopic hysterectomy experience on the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy.

Eddib A, Jain N, Aalto M, Hughes S, Eswar A, Erk M, Michalik C, Krovi V, Singhal P.

J Robot Surg. 2013 Sep;7(3):295-9. doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0388-6. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

PMID:
27000926
5.

Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.

Povolotskaya N, Woolas R, Brinkmann D.

Int J Surg Oncol. 2015;2015:814315. doi: 10.1155/2015/814315. Epub 2015 Feb 15.

6.

Cost comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus standard laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Winter ML, Leu SY, Lagrew DC Jr, Bustillo G.

J Robot Surg. 2015 Dec;9(4):269-75. doi: 10.1007/s11701-015-0526-z. Epub 2015 Jul 30.

PMID:
26530837
7.

Comparative analysis of vaginal versus robotic-assisted hysterectomy for benign indications.

Jacome EG, Hebert AE, Christian F.

J Robot Surg. 2013 Mar;7(1):39-46. doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0339-2. Epub 2012 Mar 14.

PMID:
27000891
8.

Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.

Catanzarite T, Saha S, Pilecki MA, Kim JY, Milad MP.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Sep-Oct;22(6):1049-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.05.022. Epub 2015 Jun 10.

PMID:
26070725
9.

Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.

Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Suttle AW, Hunt S.

Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Dec;111(3):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.022. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

PMID:
18829091
10.

Comparison of intraoperative outcomes using the new and old generation da VinciĀ® robot for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Shah K, Abaza R.

BJU Int. 2011 Nov;108(10):1642-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10081.x. Epub 2011 Mar 16.

11.

[A comparative analysis of hysterectomies].

Aniuliene R, Varzgaliene L, Varzgalis M.

Medicina (Kaunas). 2007;43(2):118-24. Lithuanian.

12.

A Comparison of Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted, Single-Site Laparoscopy Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site for Benign Hysterectomy.

Lopez S, Mulla ZD, Hernandez L, Garza DM, Payne TN, Farnam RW.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jan;23(1):84-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.883. Epub 2015 Aug 29.

PMID:
26321172
13.

Integration of robotics into two established programs of minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer appears to decrease surgical complications.

Cardenas-Goicoechea J, Soto E, Chuang L, Gretz H, Randall TC.

J Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Jan;24(1):21-8. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2013.24.1.21. Epub 2013 Jan 8.

14.
15.

Comparison of laparoscopic versus robotic assisted partial nephrectomy: one surgeon's initial experience.

DeLong JM, Shapiro O, Moinzadeh A.

Can J Urol. 2010 Jun;17(3):5207-12. Review.

PMID:
20566016
16.

What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?

Lenihan JP Jr, Kovanda C, Seshadri-Kreaden U.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Sep-Oct;15(5):589-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.06.015.

PMID:
18722971
17.

Dual-console robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery with respect to surgical outcomes in a gynecologic oncology fellowship program.

Smith AL, Krivak TC, Scott EM, Rauh-Hain JA, Sukumvanich P, Olawaiye AB, Richard SD.

Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Sep;126(3):432-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 May 18.

PMID:
22613352
18.

Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases.

D'Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, Trevisan P, Sovernigo G, Orsini C, Guidolin D.

Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Dec;47(12):2162-8.

PMID:
15657669
19.

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Total Laparoscopic and Robotically Assisted Hysterectomy for Benign Pathology during Introduction of a Robotic Program.

Kilic GS, Moore G, Elbatanony A, Radecki C, Phelps JY, Borahay MA.

Obstet Gynecol Int. 2011;2011:683703. doi: 10.1155/2011/683703. Epub 2011 Oct 5.

20.

A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Paraiso MF, Ridgeway B, Park AJ, Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Falcone T, Einarsson JI.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 May;208(5):368.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

PMID:
23395927
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk