Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 174

1.

Relationship of cortical thickness of the proximal humerus and pullout strength of a locked plate and screw construct.

Wallace MJ, Bledsoe G, Moed BR, Israel HA, Kaar SG.

J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Apr;26(4):222-5. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31822421f7.

PMID:
22207205
2.

Proximal humerus fracture rotational stability after fixation using a locking plate or a fixed-angle locked nail: the role of implant stiffness.

Foruria AM, Carrascal MT, Revilla C, Munuera L, Sanchez-Sotelo J.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010 May;25(4):307-11. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Feb 13.

PMID:
20153916
3.

Biomechanical comparison of a unique locking plate versus a standard plate for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures in a cadaveric model.

Walsh S, Reindl R, Harvey E, Berry G, Beckman L, Steffen T.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006 Dec;21(10):1027-31. Epub 2006 Aug 17.

PMID:
16919375
4.

Biomechanical in vitro assessment of screw augmentation in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures.

Röderer G, Scola A, Schmölz W, Gebhard F, Windolf M, Hofmann-Fliri L.

Injury. 2013 Oct;44(10):1327-32. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 Jun 12.

PMID:
23769470
5.

Are conventional reconstruction plates equivalent to precontoured locking plates for distal humerus fracture fixation? A biomechanics cadaver study.

Koonce RC, Baldini TH, Morgan SJ.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012 Aug;27(7):697-701. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.03.008. Epub 2012 Apr 25.

PMID:
22538250
6.

Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.

O'Toole RV, Andersen RC, Vesnovsky O, Alexander M, Topoleski LD, Nascone JW, Sciadini MF, Turen C, Eglseder WA Jr.

J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Nov-Dec;22(10):709-15. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31818df8cb.

PMID:
18978547
7.

Locked plate fixation of osteoporotic humeral shaft fractures: are two locking screws per segment enough?

Hak DJ, Althausen P, Hazelwood SJ.

J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Apr;24(4):207-11. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181bdd1da.

PMID:
20335752
8.

Biomechanical comparison of a proximal humeral locking plate using two methods of head fixation.

Schumer RA, Muckley KL, Markert RJ, Prayson MJ, Heflin J, Konstantakos EK, Goswami T.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jun;19(4):495-501. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.11.003. Epub 2010 Mar 1.

PMID:
20189837
9.

Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial and uniaxial locking plate fixation in a proximal tibial gap model.

Cullen AB, Curtiss S, Lee MA.

J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Aug;23(7):507-13. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181a25368.

PMID:
19633460
10.

Biomechanical effects of calcar screws and bone block augmentation on medial support in locked plating of proximal humeral fractures.

Katthagen JC, Schwarze M, Meyer-Kobbe J, Voigt C, Hurschler C, Lill H.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2014 Aug;29(7):735-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.06.008. Epub 2014 Jun 19.

PMID:
24997810
11.

Biomechanical evaluation of two intramedullary nailing techniques with different locking options in a three-part fracture proximal humerus model.

Rothstock S, Plecko M, Kloub M, Schiuma D, Windolf M, Gueorguiev B.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012 Aug;27(7):686-91. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Mar 30.

PMID:
22465242
12.

Biomechanical analysis of plate osteosynthesis systems for proximal humerus fractures.

Lever JP, Aksenov SA, Zdero R, Ahn H, McKee MD, Schemitsch EH.

J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Jan;22(1):23-9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31815c89ce.

PMID:
18176161
13.

Biomechanical effect of the configuration of screw hole style on locking plate fixation in proximal humerus fracture with a simulated gap: A finite element analysis.

Zhang YK, Wei HW, Lin KP, Chen WC, Tsai CL, Lin KJ.

Injury. 2016 Jun;47(6):1191-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.02.028. Epub 2016 Mar 7.

PMID:
26975793
14.

Biomechanics of humerus fracture fixation by locking, cortical, and hybrid plating systems in a cadaver model.

Sutherland GB, Creekmore T, Mukherjee DP, Ogden AL, Anissian L, Marymont JV.

Orthopedics. 2010 Aug 11;33(8). doi: 10.3928/01477447-20100625-02.

PMID:
20704117
15.

Schuhli augmentation of plate and screw fixation for humeral shaft fractures: a laboratory study.

Simon JA, Dennis MG, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ.

J Orthop Trauma. 1999 Mar-Apr;13(3):196-9.

PMID:
10206251
16.

Biomechanical analysis of proximal humeral fixation using locking plate fixation with an intramedullary fibular allograft.

Mathison C, Chaudhary R, Beaupre L, Reynolds M, Adeeb S, Bouliane M.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010 Aug;25(7):642-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.04.006. Epub 2010 May 16.

PMID:
20483189
17.

Biomechanical strength of the Peri-Loc proximal tibial plate: a comparison of all-locked versus hybrid locked/nonlocked screw configurations.

Estes C, Rhee P, Shrader MW, Csavina K, Jacofsky MC, Jacofsky DJ.

J Orthop Trauma. 2008 May-Jun;22(5):312-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31817279b8.

PMID:
18448984
18.

Anatomical and biomechanical evaluation of an intramedullary nail for fractures of proximal humerus fractures based on tuberosity fixation.

Clavert P, Hatzidakis A, Boileau P.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2016 Feb;32:108-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.12.005. Epub 2015 Dec 22.

PMID:
26743868
19.

Biomechanical analysis of blade plate versus locking plate fixation for a proximal humerus fracture: comparison using cadaveric and synthetic humeri.

Siffri PC, Peindl RD, Coley ER, Norton J, Connor PM, Kellam JF.

J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Sep;20(8):547-54.

PMID:
16990726
20.

Mechanisms of failure of locked-plate fixation of the proximal humerus: acoustic emissions as a novel assessment modality.

Hymes RA, Levine MJ, Schulman JE, Westbrook RD, Li J.

J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Jul;27(7):392-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31827934c1.

PMID:
23187155

Supplemental Content

Support Center