Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 264

1.

The combination of four different clinical decision rules and an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off increases the number of patients in whom acute pulmonary embolism can safely be excluded.

van Es J, Mos I, Douma R, Erkens P, Durian M, Nizet T, van Houten A, Hofstee H, ten Cate H, Ullmann E, Büller H, Huisman M, Kamphuisen PW.

Thromb Haemost. 2012 Jan;107(1):167-71. doi: 10.1160/TH11-08-0587. Epub 2011 Nov 10.

PMID:
22072293
2.

Validity and clinical utility of the simplified Wells rule for assessing clinical probability for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism.

Douma RA, Gibson NS, Gerdes VE, Büller HR, Wells PS, Perrier A, Le Gal G.

Thromb Haemost. 2009 Jan;101(1):197-200.

PMID:
19132208
3.

Using an age-dependent D-dimer cut-off value increases the number of older patients in whom deep vein thrombosis can be safely excluded.

Douma RA, Tan M, Schutgens RE, Bates SM, Perrier A, Legnani C, Biesma DH, Ginsberg JS, Bounameaux H, Palareti G, Carrier M, Mol GC, Le Gal G, Kamphuisen PW, Righini M.

Haematologica. 2012 Oct;97(10):1507-13. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.060657. Epub 2012 Apr 17.

4.

Performance of 4 clinical decision rules in the diagnostic management of acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort study.

Douma RA, Mos IC, Erkens PM, Nizet TA, Durian MF, Hovens MM, van Houten AA, Hofstee HM, Klok FA, ten Cate H, Ullmann EF, Büller HR, Kamphuisen PW, Huisman MV; Prometheus Study Group.

Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jun 7;154(11):709-18. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-11-201106070-00002.

PMID:
21646554
5.

Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study.

Righini M, Van Es J, Den Exter PL, Roy PM, Verschuren F, Ghuysen A, Rutschmann OT, Sanchez O, Jaffrelot M, Trinh-Duc A, Le Gall C, Moustafa F, Principe A, Van Houten AA, Ten Wolde M, Douma RA, Hazelaar G, Erkens PM, Van Kralingen KW, Grootenboers MJ, Durian MF, Cheung YW, Meyer G, Bounameaux H, Huisman MV, Kamphuisen PW, Le Gal G.

JAMA. 2014 Mar 19;311(11):1117-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2135. Erratum in: JAMA. 2014 Apr 23-30;311(16):1694.

6.

Clinical decision rule and D-dimer have lower clinical utility to exclude pulmonary embolism in cancer patients. Explanations and potential ameliorations.

Douma RA, van Sluis GL, Kamphuisen PW, Söhne M, Leebeek FW, Bossuyt PM, Büller HR.

Thromb Haemost. 2010 Oct;104(4):831-6. doi: 10.1160/TH10-02-0093. Epub 2010 Jul 20.

PMID:
20664894
7.

Potential of an age adjusted D-dimer cut-off value to improve the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in older patients: a retrospective analysis of three large cohorts.

Douma RA, le Gal G, Söhne M, Righini M, Kamphuisen PW, Perrier A, Kruip MJ, Bounameaux H, Büller HR, Roy PM.

BMJ. 2010 Mar 30;340:c1475. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1475.

8.

Performance of age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off to rule out pulmonary embolism.

Penaloza A, Roy PM, Kline J, Verschuren F, LE Gal G, Quentin-Georget S, Delvau N, Thys F.

J Thromb Haemost. 2012 Jul;10(7):1291-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04769.x.

9.

Variable D-dimer thresholds for diagnosis of clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism.

van der Hulle T, den Exter PL, Erkens PG, van Es J, Mos IC, ten Cate H, Kamphuisen PW, Hovens MM, Büller HR, Klok FA, Huisman MV.

J Thromb Haemost. 2013 Nov;11(11):1986-92. doi: 10.1111/jth.12394.

10.

Diagnostic accuracy of conventional or age adjusted D-dimer cut-off values in older patients with suspected venous thromboembolism: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Schouten HJ, Geersing GJ, Koek HL, Zuithoff NP, Janssen KJ, Douma RA, van Delden JJ, Moons KG, Reitsma JB.

BMJ. 2013 May 3;346:f2492. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2492. Review.

11.

Clinical probability score and D-dimer estimation lack utility in the diagnosis of childhood pulmonary embolism.

Biss TT, Brandão LR, Kahr WH, Chan AK, Williams S.

J Thromb Haemost. 2009 Oct;7(10):1633-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03572.x. Epub 2009 Aug 11.

12.

Performance of the age-adjusted cut-off for D-dimer in patients with cancer and suspected pulmonary embolism.

Wilts IT, Le Gal G, Den Exter PL, Van Es J, Carrier M, Planquette B, Büller HR, Righini M, Huisman MV, Kamphuisen PW.

Thromb Res. 2017 Apr;152:49-51. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 13.

PMID:
28226257
13.

Rapid quantitative D-dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort management study.

Bates SM, Takach Lapner S, Douketis JD, Kearon C, Julian J, Parpia S, Schulman S, Weitz JI, Linkins LA, Crowther M, Lim W, Spencer FA, Lee AY, Gross PL, Ginsberg J.

J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Mar;14(3):504-9. doi: 10.1111/jth.13234. Epub 2016 Feb 5.

PMID:
26707364
14.

Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer.

Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Ginsberg JS, Kearon C, Gent M, Turpie AG, Bormanis J, Weitz J, Chamberlain M, Bowie D, Barnes D, Hirsh J.

Thromb Haemost. 2000 Mar;83(3):416-20.

PMID:
10744147
15.

Evaluation of Wells score and repeated D-dimer in diagnosing venous thromboembolism.

Ljungqvist M, Söderberg M, Moritz P, Ahlgren A, Lärfars G.

Eur J Intern Med. 2008 Jun;19(4):285-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2007.08.007. Epub 2008 Jan 30.

PMID:
18471679
16.

Different accuracies of rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent, turbidimetric, and agglutination D-dimer assays for thrombosis exclusion: impact on diagnostic work-ups of outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

Michiels JJ, Gadisseur A, van der Planken M, Schroyens W, De Maeseneer M, Hermsen JT, Trienekens PH, Hoogsteden H, Pattynama PM.

Semin Thromb Hemost. 2006 Oct;32(7):678-93. Review.

PMID:
17024595
17.

Simple and safe exclusion of pulmonary embolism in outpatients using quantitative D-dimer and Wells' simplified decision rule.

Goekoop RJ, Steeghs N, Niessen RW, Jonkers GJ, Dik H, Castel A, Werker-van Gelder L, Vlasveld LT, van Klink RC, Planken EV, Huisman MV.

Thromb Haemost. 2007 Jan;97(1):146-50.

PMID:
17200782
18.

Simplification of the revised Geneva score for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.

Klok FA, Mos IC, Nijkeuter M, Righini M, Perrier A, Le Gal G, Huisman MV.

Arch Intern Med. 2008 Oct 27;168(19):2131-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.19.2131.

PMID:
18955643
19.
20.

Value of D-dimer testing for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in patients with previous venous thromboembolism.

Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM, Sanchez O, Aujesky D, Perrier A, Bounameaux H.

Arch Intern Med. 2006 Jan 23;166(2):176-80.

PMID:
16432085

Supplemental Content

Support Center