Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 115

1.

Nucleosome-coupled expression differences in closely-related species.

Guan Y, Yao V, Tsui K, Gebbia M, Dunham MJ, Nislow C, Troyanskaya OG.

BMC Genomics. 2011 Sep 26;12:466. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-466.

2.

Evidence of association between nucleosome occupancy and the evolution of transcription factor binding sites in yeast.

Swamy KB, Chu WY, Wang CY, Tsai HK, Wang D.

BMC Evol Biol. 2011 May 31;11:150. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-150.

3.

Cell cycle-specified fluctuation of nucleosome occupancy at gene promoters.

Hogan GJ, Lee CK, Lieb JD.

PLoS Genet. 2006 Sep 22;2(9):e158. Epub 2006 Aug 8.

4.

Divergence of transcription factor binding sites across related yeast species.

Borneman AR, Gianoulis TA, Zhang ZD, Yu H, Rozowsky J, Seringhaus MR, Wang LY, Gerstein M, Snyder M.

Science. 2007 Aug 10;317(5839):815-9.

5.

A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast.

Lee W, Tillo D, Bray N, Morse RH, Davis RW, Hughes TR, Nislow C.

Nat Genet. 2007 Oct;39(10):1235-44. Epub 2007 Sep 16.

PMID:
17873876
6.

Evolution of nucleosome occupancy: conservation of global properties and divergence of gene-specific patterns.

Tsui K, Dubuis S, Gebbia M, Morse RH, Barkai N, Tirosh I, Nislow C.

Mol Cell Biol. 2011 Nov;31(21):4348-55. doi: 10.1128/MCB.05276-11. Epub 2011 Sep 6.

7.

Dynamic changes in nucleosome occupancy are not predictive of gene expression dynamics but are linked to transcription and chromatin regulators.

Huebert DJ, Kuan PF, Keleş S, Gasch AP.

Mol Cell Biol. 2012 May;32(9):1645-53. doi: 10.1128/MCB.06170-11. Epub 2012 Feb 21.

8.

Transcription factor binding site positioning in yeast: proximal promoter motifs characterize TATA-less promoters.

Erb I, van Nimwegen E.

PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024279. Epub 2011 Sep 9.

9.

Chromatin remodelers clear nucleosomes from intrinsically unfavorable sites to establish nucleosome-depleted regions at promoters.

Tolkunov D, Zawadzki KA, Singer C, Elfving N, Morozov AV, Broach JR.

Mol Biol Cell. 2011 Jun 15;22(12):2106-18. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-10-0826. Epub 2011 Apr 20.

10.

Activator control of nucleosome occupancy in activation and repression of transcription.

Bryant GO, Prabhu V, Floer M, Wang X, Spagna D, Schreiber D, Ptashne M.

PLoS Biol. 2008 Dec 23;6(12):2928-39. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060317.

11.

Nucleosome free regions in yeast promoters result from competitive binding of transcription factors that interact with chromatin modifiers.

Ozonov EA, van Nimwegen E.

PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(8):e1003181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003181. Epub 2013 Aug 22.

12.

Global nucleosome occupancy in yeast.

Bernstein BE, Liu CL, Humphrey EL, Perlstein EO, Schreiber SL.

Genome Biol. 2004;5(9):R62. Epub 2004 Aug 20.

13.

Identifying cooperative transcription factors in yeast using multiple data sources.

Lai FJ, Jhu MH, Chiu CC, Huang YM, Wu WS.

BMC Syst Biol. 2014;8 Suppl 5:S2. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-8-S5-S2. Epub 2014 Dec 12.

14.

Functional role of histone variant Htz1 in the stress response to oleate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Liu H, Li G, Liu L, Wan Y.

Biosci Rep. 2015 May 20;35(4). pii: e00224. doi: 10.1042/BSR20150114.

15.
16.

Nucleosome alterations caused by mutations at modifiable histone residues in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Liu H, Wang P, Liu L, Min Z, Luo K, Wan Y.

Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 26;5:15583. doi: 10.1038/srep15583.

17.

Chemical map of Schizosaccharomyces pombe reveals species-specific features in nucleosome positioning.

Moyle-Heyrman G, Zaichuk T, Xi L, Zhang Q, Uhlenbeck OC, Holmgren R, Widom J, Wang JP.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Dec 10;110(50):20158-63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1315809110. Epub 2013 Nov 25.

18.

Divergence of nucleosome positioning between two closely related yeast species: genetic basis and functional consequences.

Tirosh I, Sigal N, Barkai N.

Mol Syst Biol. 2010 May 11;6:365. doi: 10.1038/msb.2010.20.

19.

Effect of sequence-directed nucleosome disruption on cell-type-specific repression by alpha2/Mcm1 in the yeast genome.

Morohashi N, Yamamoto Y, Kuwana S, Morita W, Shindo H, Mitchell AP, Shimizu M.

Eukaryot Cell. 2006 Nov;5(11):1925-33. Epub 2006 Sep 15.

Supplemental Content

Support Center