Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 83

1.

High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes.

Cicchetti DV, Feinstein AR.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):551-8.

PMID:
2189948
2.

High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes.

Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):543-9.

PMID:
2348207
3.

Behavior and interpretation of the kappa statistic: resolution of the two paradoxes.

Lantz CA, Nebenzahl E.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Apr;49(4):431-4.

PMID:
8621993
4.

Statistical methods in epidemiology. v. Towards an understanding of the kappa coefficient.

Rigby AS.

Disabil Rehabil. 2000 May 20;22(8):339-44. Review.

PMID:
10896093
5.

Observer variation in the assessment of the histopathologic diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Riber C, Tønnesen H, Aru A, Bjerregaard B.

Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jan;34(1):46-9.

PMID:
10048732
6.
7.
8.

Bias, prevalence and kappa.

Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 May;46(5):423-9.

PMID:
8501467
9.
10.

Inter-observer variability in the assessment of nerve function in leprosy patients in Ethiopia.

Lienhardt C, Currie H, Wheeler JG.

Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1995 Mar;63(1):62-76.

PMID:
7730721
11.

Observer agreement paradoxes in 2x2 tables: comparison of agreement measures.

Shankar V, Bangdiwala SI.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Aug 28;14:100. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-100.

12.

[True and false agreement relations between 2 qualitative tests].

Grenier B.

Pathol Biol (Paris). 1985 Nov;33(9):934-8. French.

PMID:
3909085
14.
15.

Observer agreement on pen level prevalence of clinical signs in finishing pigs.

Petersen HH, Enøe C, Nielsen EO.

Prev Vet Med. 2004 Jul 16;64(2-4):147-56.

PMID:
15325769
16.

Inter- and intra-observer variation in the histopathological reporting of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions using a modified Bethesda grading system.

McCluggage WG, Walsh MY, Thornton CM, Hamilton PW, Date A, Caughley LM, Bharucha H.

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Feb;105(2):206-10.

PMID:
9501788
17.

Interexaminer reliability of low back pain assessment using the McKenzie method.

Kilpikoski S, Airaksinen O, Kankaanpää M, Leminen P, Videman T, Alen M.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Apr 15;27(8):E207-14.

PMID:
11935120
18.

Inter-observer agreement in audit of quality of radiology requests and reports.

Stavem K, Foss T, Botnmark O, Andersen OK, Erikssen J.

Clin Radiol. 2004 Nov;59(11):1018-24.

PMID:
15488851
19.

Observer variability in the assessment of type and dysplasia of colorectal adenomas, analyzed using kappa statistics.

Jensen P, Krogsgaard MR, Christiansen J, Braendstrup O, Johansen A, Olsen J.

Dis Colon Rectum. 1995 Feb;38(2):195-8.

PMID:
7851176
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center