Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 158

1.

Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.

Baan R, Grosse Y, Lauby-Secretan B, El Ghissassi F, Bouvard V, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Guha N, Islami F, Galichet L, Straif K; WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group.

Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jul;12(7):624-6. No abstract available. Erratum in: Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):e379.

PMID:
21845765
2.

Non-ionizing radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.

IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans.

IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2013;102(Pt 2):1-460. Review. No abstract available.

3.

Tinnitus and cell phones: the role of electromagnetic radiofrequency radiation.

Mortazavi SM, Mortazavi SA.

Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Mar-Apr;82(2):248-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.11.014. Epub 2016 Feb 9. No abstract available.

4.

[Mutagenic, carcinogenic and teratogenic effects induced by radiofrequency electromagnetic field of mobile phone].

Chen ZJ, He JL.

Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2008 Jan;37(1):97-102. Chinese.

PMID:
18275128
5.

Interphone, IARC and radiofrequency fields: where to next?

Sim MR, Richardson DB.

Occup Environ Med. 2011 Sep;68(9):629-30. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100358. No abstract available.

PMID:
21835976
6.

Tinnitus and cell phones: the role of electromagnetic radiofrequency radiation.

Medeiros LN, Sanchez TG.

Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jan-Feb;82(1):97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.04.013. Epub 2015 Sep 21. Review.

7.

Comments on the article entitled "review of possible modulation-dependent biological effects of radiofrequency fields" by Juutilainen et al.

Balzano Q, Sheppard AR.

Bioelectromagnetics. 2012 Dec;33(8):710-1. doi: 10.1002/bem.21716. Epub 2012 Apr 11. No abstract available.

PMID:
22496073
8.

[Cellular phones--prosperity or carcinogenesis].

Sadetzki S, Modan B.

Harefuah. 2000 Nov;139(9-10):360-2. Review. Hebrew. No abstract available.

PMID:
11341214
9.

The precautionary principle: radiofrequency exposures from mobile telephones and base stations.

Zinelis SA.

Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Jan;118(1):A16; author reply A16-7. No abstract available.

10.

[Electromagnetic fields: damage to health due to the nocebo effect].

Schooneveld H.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007 Jul 7;151(27):1546-7; author reply 1547-8. Dutch. No abstract available.

PMID:
17763818
11.

Mobile phones are given the all clear by UK group.

Wise J.

BMJ. 2014 Feb 10;348:g1477. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1477. No abstract available.

PMID:
24518854
12.

Cell phone radiofrequency radiation exposure and brain glucose metabolism.

Lai H, Hardell L.

JAMA. 2011 Feb 23;305(8):828-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.201. No abstract available.

PMID:
21343585
13.

Scientists decry Canada's outdated Wi-Fi safety rules.

Webster PC.

CMAJ. 2015 Jun 16;187(9):639-40. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5061. Epub 2015 May 11. No abstract available.

14.

Editorial comment.

Safarinejad MR.

Urol J. 2013 Spring;10(2):892-3; discussion 893. No abstract available.

15.

Response to Ahrens and Schisterman.

Sudan M, Kheifets L, Arah OA, Olsen J.

Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;27(5):504. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12067. Epub 2013 Jul 3. No abstract available.

PMID:
23930787
16.

Letter to the editor from Ahrens and Schisterman.

Ahrens K, Schisterman E.

Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;27(5):503. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12065. Epub 2013 Jul 25. No abstract available.

PMID:
23930786
17.

Biologic effects and health consequences of low and high (radio) frequency electromagnetic fields.

Srebro Z, Dziobek K.

Folia Med Cracov. 2003;44(1-2):201-5. Review.

PMID:
15232902
18.

[Mobile telephones: playing with our health?].

Leal Hernández M, Abellán Alemán J, Casas Pina M.

Aten Primaria. 2005 May 15;35(8):415-8. Spanish. No abstract available.

19.

[The controversy of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves].

Nau JY.

Rev Med Suisse. 2009 Oct 28;5(223):2177. French. No abstract available.

PMID:
19968033
20.

Does mobile phone exposure affect spermatogenesis?

Das S.

Arch Med Res. 2008 May;39(4):464; author reply 465. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2008.02.003. No abstract available.

PMID:
18375261

Supplemental Content

Support Center