Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 416

1.

Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography.

Baek C, Paeng JY, Lee JS, Hong J.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 May;70(5):1161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.135. Epub 2011 Jul 16.

PMID:
21763045
2.

Skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions using cone-beam computed tomography.

Sanders DA, Rigali PH, Neace WP, Uribe F, Nanda R.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Nov;138(5):542.e1-20; discussion 542-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.027.

PMID:
21055586
3.

Three-dimensional evaluation of craniofacial asymmetry: an analysis using computed tomography.

Yáñez-Vico RM, Iglesias-Linares A, Torres-Lagares D, Gutiérrez-Pérez JL, Solano-Reina E.

Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Oct;15(5):729-36. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0441-7. Epub 2010 Jul 15.

PMID:
20632049
4.

Quantification of skeletal asymmetries in normal adolescents: cone-beam computed tomography analysis.

Sanders DA, Chandhoke TK, Uribe FA, Rigali PH, Nanda R.

Prog Orthod. 2014 Apr 1;15(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0026-0.

5.

Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.

Nur RB, Çakan DG, Arun T.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Feb;149(2):225-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.038.

PMID:
26827979
6.

Mandibular dimensions of subjects with asymmetric skeletal class III malocclusion and normal occlusion compared with cone-beam computed tomography.

Lee H, Bayome M, Kim SH, Kim KB, Behrents RG, Kook YA.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Aug;142(2):179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.024.

PMID:
22858326
7.

The use of three-dimensional cephalometric references in dentoskeletal symmetry diagnosis.

Porto OC, de Freitas JC, de Alencar AH, Estrela C.

Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 Nov-Dec;19(6):78-85. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.078-085.oar. Epub 2014 Dec 1.

8.

Lateral cephalometric diagnosis of asymmetry in Angle Class II subdivision compared to Class I and II.

Meloti AF, Gonçalves Rde C, Silva E, Martins LP, dos Santos-Pinto A.

Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 Jul-Aug;19(4):80-8.

9.

Spatial analysis of condyle position according to sagittal skeletal relationship, assessed by cone beam computed tomography.

Arieta-Miranda JM, Silva-Valencia M, Flores-Mir C, Paredes-Sampen NA, Arriola-Guillen LE.

Prog Orthod. 2013 Oct 18;14:36. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-36.

10.

A comparison of craniofacial morphology in patients with and without facial asymmetry--a three-dimensional analysis with computed tomography.

Kwon TG, Park HS, Ryoo HM, Lee SH.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Jan;35(1):43-8. Epub 2005 May 31.

PMID:
15925488
11.

3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry.

Katsumata A, Fujishita M, Maeda M, Ariji Y, Ariji E, Langlais RP.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Feb;99(2):212-20.

PMID:
15660095
12.

Skeletodental factors affecting chin point deviation in female patients with class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry: a three-dimensional analysis using computed tomography.

Baek SH, Cho IS, Chang YI, Kim MJ.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Nov;104(5):628-39. Epub 2007 Jul 25.

PMID:
17656131
13.

Evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Angle Class II subdivision malocclusions with cone-beam computed tomography.

Minich CM, Araújo EA, Behrents RG, Buschang PH, Tanaka OM, Kim KB.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jul;144(1):57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.026.

PMID:
23810046
14.

Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomographic image reorientation using soft tissues as reference for facial asymmetry diagnosis.

Lee JK, Jung PK, Moon CH.

Angle Orthod. 2014 Jan;84(1):38-47. doi: 10.2319/112112-890.1. Epub 2013 Jun 11.

PMID:
23758600
15.

Evaluation of mandibular volume using cone-beam computed tomography and correlation with cephalometric values.

Katayama K, Yamaguchi T, Sugiura M, Haga S, Maki K.

Angle Orthod. 2014 Mar;84(2):337-42. doi: 10.2319/012913-87.1. Epub 2013 Aug 28.

PMID:
23985034
16.

Is it possible to use cross-sectional and vertical facial measurements to establish the shape of the mandibular arch?

El Haje OA, Pompeo DD, Furtado GC, Rivera LM, Paranhos LR.

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Nov 1;15(6):735-9.

PMID:
25825099
17.

Maxillary yaw as the primary predictor of maxillary dental midline deviation: 3D analysis using cone-beam computed tomography.

Song WW, Kim SS, Sándor GK, Kim YD.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Apr;71(4):752-62. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.07.043. Epub 2012 Sep 23.

PMID:
23010372
18.

[Maxillofacial 3-dimensional morphological analysis for patients with Class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry].

Pan S, Wang CL, Liu DX, Dong RP, Han M.

Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2010 Feb;19(1):6-10. Chinese.

PMID:
20300684
19.

Tooth axis and skeletal structures in mandibular molar vertical sections in jaw deformity with facial asymmetry using MPR images.

Nojima K, Yokose T, Ishii T, Kobayashi M, Nishii Y.

Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2007 Nov;48(4):171-6.

20.

Effect of intended manual condylar positioning on skeletal and dental changes in Skeletal Class III deformities: CBCT-generated half-cephalograms.

Hwang DS, Kim YI, Lee KM.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Jan;42(1):7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.01.031. Epub 2013 Feb 21.

PMID:
23434240

Supplemental Content

Support Center