Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 96

1.

The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations.

Anderson SE, Siegel PD, Meade BJ.

J Allergy (Cairo). 2011;2011:424203. doi: 10.1155/2011/424203. Epub 2011 Jun 16.

2.

Application of BALB/c mouse in the local lymph node assay:BrdU-ELISA for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals.

Hou F, Xing C, Li B, Cheng J, Chen W, Zhang M.

J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2015 Mar-Apr;72:53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 16.

PMID:
25600862
3.

Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals.

Gerberick GF, Ryan CA, Dearman RJ, Kimber I.

Methods. 2007 Jan;41(1):54-60. Review.

PMID:
16938465
4.

Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data.

Gerberick GF, Robinson MK, Ryan CA, Dearman RJ, Kimber I, Basketter DA, Wright Z, Marks JG.

Am J Contact Dermat. 2001 Sep;12(3):156-61.

PMID:
11526521
5.

Nothing is perfect, not even the local lymph node assay: a commentary and the implications for REACH.

Basketter DA, McFadden JF, Gerberick F, Cockshott A, Kimber I.

Contact Dermatitis. 2009 Feb;60(2):65-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01444.x.

PMID:
19207375
6.

Activity of human contact allergens in the murine local lymph node assay.

Ryan CA, Gerberick GF, Cruse LW, Basketter DA, Lea L, Blaikie L, Dearman RJ, Warbrick EV, Kimber I.

Contact Dermatitis. 2000 Aug;43(2):95-102.

PMID:
10945748
7.
8.

The local lymph node assay: past, present and future.

Kimber I, Dearman RJ, Basketter DA, Ryan CA, Gerberick GF.

Contact Dermatitis. 2002 Dec;47(6):315-28. Review.

PMID:
12581276
9.

Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays.

Schneider K, Akkan Z.

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2004 Jun;39(3):245-55.

PMID:
15135206
10.

Local lymph node assay: use in hazard and risk assessment.

Dearman RJ, Basketter DA, Kimber I.

J Appl Toxicol. 1999 Sep-Oct;19(5):299-306. Review.

PMID:
10513674
11.

Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency.

Basketter DA, Balikie L, Dearman RJ, Kimber I, Ryan CA, Gerberick GF, Harvey P, Evans P, White IR, Rycroft RJ.

Contact Dermatitis. 2000 Jun;42(6):344-8.

PMID:
10871098
12.
13.

Vehicle effects on skin sensitizing potency of four chemicals: assessment using the local lymph node assay.

Wright ZM, Basketter PA, Blaikie L, Cooper KJ, Warbrick EV, Dearman RJ, Kimber I.

Int J Cosmet Sci. 2001 Apr;23(2):75-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-2494.2001.00066.x.

PMID:
18498452
14.

The local lymph node assay: current position in the regulatory classification of skin sensitizing chemicals.

Basketter DA, Gerberick GF, Kimber I.

Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2007;26(4):293-301.

PMID:
18058304
15.
16.

Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment.

Kimber I, Basketter DA, Berthold K, Butler M, Garrigue JL, Lea L, Newsome C, Roggeband R, Steiling W, Stropp G, Waterman S, Wiemann C.

Toxicol Sci. 2001 Feb;59(2):198-208. Review.

PMID:
11158712
17.

Use of the local lymph node assay in the evaluation of the sensitizing potential of pharmaceutical process intermediates.

Durand G, de Burlet G, Virat M, Nauman BD.

Contact Dermatitis. 2003 Sep;49(3):148-54.

PMID:
14678211
18.

The impact of vehicle on the relative potency of skin-sensitizing chemicals in the local lymph node assay.

Jowsey IR, Clapp CJ, Safford B, Gibbons BT, Basketter DA.

Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2008;27(2):67-75. doi: 10.1080/15569520801904655.

PMID:
18568891
20.

Examination of a vehicle for use with water soluble materials in the murine local lymph node assay.

Ryan CA, Cruse LW, Skinner RA, Dearman RJ, Kimber I, Gerberick GF.

Food Chem Toxicol. 2002 Nov;40(11):1719-25.

PMID:
12176099

Supplemental Content

Support Center