Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 183

1.

Psychometric development and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with interpersonal relationship with navigator measure: a multi-site patient navigation research program study.

Jean-Pierre P, Fiscella K, Winters PC, Post D, Wells KJ, McKoy JM, Battaglia T, Simon MA, Kilbourn K; Patient Navigation Research Program Group..

Psychooncology. 2012 Sep;21(9):986-92. doi: 10.1002/pon.2002.

2.

Cross-cultural validation of a Patient Satisfaction with Interpersonal Relationship with Navigator measure: a multi-site patient navigation research study.

Jean-Pierre P, Fiscella K, Winters PC, Paskett E, Wells K, Battaglia T; Patient Navigation Research Program Group..

Psychooncology. 2012 Dec;21(12):1309-15. doi: 10.1002/pon.2018.

3.

Psychometric validation and reliability analysis of a Spanish version of the patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a patient navigation research program study.

Jean-Pierre P, Fiscella K, Winters PC, Paskett E, Wells K, Battaglia T; Patient Navigation Research Program Group..

Support Care Cancer. 2012 Sep;20(9):1949-56. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1297-3.

4.

Structural and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a multisite patient navigation research program study.

Jean-Pierre P, Fiscella K, Freund KM, Clark J, Darnell J, Holden A, Post D, Patierno SR, Winters PC; Patient Navigation Research Program Group..

Cancer. 2011 Feb 15;117(4):854-61. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25501.

5.

Satisfaction with cancer care among underserved racial-ethnic minorities and lower-income patients receiving patient navigation.

Jean-Pierre P, Cheng Y, Wells KJ, Freund KM, Snyder FR, Fiscella K, Holden AE, Paskett ED, Dudley DJ, Simon MA, Valverde PA; Patient Navigation Research Program..

Cancer. 2016 Apr 1;122(7):1060-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29902.

PMID:
26849163
6.

Do better-rated navigators improve patient satisfaction with cancer-related care?

Jean-Pierre P, Winters PC, Clark JA, Warren-Mears V, Wells KJ, Post DM, LaVerda N, Van Duyn MA, Fiscella K; Patient Navigation Research Program Group..

J Cancer Educ. 2013 Sep;28(3):527-34. doi: 10.1007/s13187-013-0498-5.

7.
8.

Psychometric evaluation of the patient satisfaction with logistical aspects of navigation (PSN-L) scale using item response theory.

Carle AC, Jean-Pierre P, Winters P, Valverde P, Wells K, Simon M, Raich P, Patierno S, Katz M, Freund KM, Dudley D, Fiscella K.

Med Care. 2014 Apr;52(4):354-61. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000089.

9.

Lay patient navigator program implementation for equal access to cancer care and clinical trials: essential steps and initial challenges.

Steinberg ML, Fremont A, Khan DC, Huang D, Knapp H, Karaman D, Forge N, Andre K, Chaiken LM, Streeter OE Jr.

Cancer. 2006 Dec 1;107(11):2669-77.

10.

Development of a psychometric scale to assess satisfaction with dental care among Sri Lankans.

Perera IR, Usgodaarachchi US.

Community Dent Health. 2009 Sep;26(3):150-6.

PMID:
19780355
11.
12.

Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Dental Satisfaction Questionnaire.

López-Garví AJ, Montiel-Company JM, Almerich-Silla JM.

Community Dent Health. 2014 Mar;31(1):44-9.

PMID:
24741893
13.

A pre-post survey analysis of satisfaction with health care and medical mistrust after patient navigation for American Indian cancer patients.

Guadagnolo BA, Cina K, Koop D, Brunette D, Petereit DG.

J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011 Nov;22(4):1331-43. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2011.0115.

14.

Item response theory analysis of the patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a psychometric investigation in a multicultural sample of 1,296 participants.

Jean-Pierre P, Cheng Y, Paskett E, Shao C, Fiscella K, Winters P; Patient Navigation Research Program..

Support Care Cancer. 2014 Aug;22(8):2229-40. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2202-7.

15.

Development and validation of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy treatment satisfaction (FACIT TS) measures.

Peipert JD, Beaumont JL, Bode R, Cella D, Garcia SF, Hahn EA.

Qual Life Res. 2014 Apr;23(3):815-24. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0520-8.

PMID:
24062239
16.

Psychometric properties of the Persian version of satisfaction with care EORTC-in-patsat32 questionnaire among Iranian cancer patients.

Pishkuhi MA, Salmaniyan S, Nedjat S, Zendedel K, Lari MA.

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(23):10121-8.

17.

Development and testing of the Oncology Patients' Perceptions of the Quality of Nursing Care Scale.

Radwin L, Alster K, Rubin KM.

Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003 Mar-Apr;30(2):283-90.

PMID:
12692662
18.

Psychometric assessment and application of a questionnaire measuring patient: satisfaction with information on cancer treatment.

Liekweg A, Eckhardt M, Taylor SC, Erdfelder E, Jaehde U.

Pharm World Sci. 2005 Apr;27(2):96-103.

PMID:
15999919
19.

Understanding the processes of patient navigation to reduce disparities in cancer care: perspectives of trained navigators from the field.

Jean-Pierre P, Hendren S, Fiscella K, Loader S, Rousseau S, Schwartzbauer B, Sanders M, Carroll J, Epstein R.

J Cancer Educ. 2011 Mar;26(1):111-20. doi: 10.1007/s13187-010-0122-x.

20.

Measuring empathic, person-centred communication in primary care nurses: validity and reliability of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure.

Bikker AP, Fitzpatrick B, Murphy D, Mercer SW.

BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Oct 23;16:149. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0374-y.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center