Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 187

1.

Observational studies in systematic [corrected] reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.

Norris SL, Atkins D, Bruening W, Fox S, Johnson E, Kane R, Morton SC, Oremus M, Ospina M, Randhawa G, Schoelles K, Shekelle P, Viswanathan M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1178-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.027. Erratum in: J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Oct;66(10):1194.

PMID:
21636246
2.

Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.

Atkins D, Chang SM, Gartlehner G, Buckley DI, Whitlock EP, Berliner E, Matchar D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1198-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.021.

PMID:
21463926
3.

AHRQ series paper 4: assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.

Chou R, Aronson N, Atkins D, Ismaila AS, Santaguida P, Smith DH, Whitlock E, Wilt TJ, Moher D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):502-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.007. Review.

PMID:
18823754
4.

Finding evidence for comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.

Relevo R, Balshem H.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1168-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.022. Review.

PMID:
21684115
5.

Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.

Fu R, Gartlehner G, Grant M, Shamliyan T, Sedrakyan A, Wilt TJ, Griffith L, Oremus M, Raina P, Ismaila A, Santaguida P, Lau J, Trikalinos TA.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1187-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.08.010.

PMID:
21477993
7.

AHRQ series paper 2: principles for developing guidance: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.

Helfand M, Balshem H.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):484-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.05.005.

PMID:
19716268
8.

Assessing equivalence and noninferiority.

Treadwell JR, Uhl S, Tipton K, Shamliyan T, Viswanathan M, Berkman ND, Sun X, Coleman CI, Elshaug AG, Singh S, Wang SY, Ramakrishnan R.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Nov;65(11):1144-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.05.001.

PMID:
22732455
9.

Updating comparative effectiveness reviews: current efforts in AHRQ's Effective Health Care Program.

Tsertsvadze A, Maglione M, Chou R, Garritty C, Coleman C, Lux L, Bass E, Balshem H, Moher D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1208-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.011.

PMID:
21684114
10.

The value of including observational studies in systematic reviews was unclear: a descriptive study.

Seida J, Dryden DM, Hartling L.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;67(12):1343-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.014.

PMID:
25248829
11.

The refinement of topics for systematic reviews: lessons and recommendations from the Effective Health Care Program.

Buckley DI, Ansari MT, Butler M, Soh C, Chang CS.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;67(4):425-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.023.

PMID:
24581296
12.

AHRQ series paper 1: comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.

Slutsky J, Atkins D, Chang S, Sharp BA.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):481-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.009.

PMID:
18834715
13.

Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.

PMID:
18987905
14.
15.

AHRQ series paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.

Whitlock EP, Lopez SA, Chang S, Helfand M, Eder M, Floyd N.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):491-501. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.008.

PMID:
19540721
16.

[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. German.

PMID:
19034813
17.

Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacoot N, Glanville J.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. Review.

18.

Methodology for the systematic reviews on an evidence-based approach for the management of chronic low back pain.

Norvell DC, Dettori JR, Fehlings MG, Fourney DR, Chapman JR.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S10-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef8ee. Review.

PMID:
21952182
19.

Assessing the impact of systematic reviews on future research: two case studies.

Viswanathan M, Nerz P, Dalberth B, Voisin C, Lohr KN, Tant E, Jonas DE, Carey T.

J Comp Eff Res. 2012 Jul;1(4):329-46. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.28. Review.

PMID:
24237467
20.

AHRQ series commentary 3: the United States addresses comparative effectiveness but not cost-effectiveness through the effective health-care program.

Freemantle N, Drummond MF.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):479-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.01.008. No abstract available.

PMID:
20346862

Supplemental Content

Support Center