Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 148

1.

Effect size measures for mediation models: quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects.

Preacher KJ, Kelley K.

Psychol Methods. 2011 Jun;16(2):93-115. doi: 10.1037/a0022658.

PMID:
21500915
2.

"Proportion explained": a causal interpretation for standard measures of indirect effect?

Hafeman DM.

Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Dec 1;170(11):1443-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp283. Epub 2009 Oct 22.

PMID:
19850625
3.

SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models.

Preacher KJ, Hayes AF.

Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Nov;36(4):717-31.

PMID:
15641418
4.

A priori power analysis in longitudinal three-level multilevel models: an example with therapist effects.

de Jong K, Moerbeek M, van der Leeden R.

Psychother Res. 2010 May;20(3):273-84. doi: 10.1080/10503300903376320.

PMID:
19946814
5.

Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.

Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC.

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007 Nov;82(4):591-605. Review. Erratum in: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2009 Aug;84(3):515.

PMID:
17944619
6.

Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations.

Shrout PE, Bolger N.

Psychol Methods. 2002 Dec;7(4):422-45.

PMID:
12530702
7.

Assessing clinical significance: does it matter which method we use?

Atkins DC, Bedics JD, McGlinchey JB, Beauchaine TP.

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Oct;73(5):982-9.

PMID:
16287398
8.

Standardized or simple effect size: what should be reported?

Baguley T.

Br J Psychol. 2009 Aug;100(Pt 3):603-17. doi: 10.1348/000712608X377117. Epub 2008 Nov 17.

PMID:
19017432
9.
10.

When effect sizes disagree: the case of r and d.

McGrath RE, Meyer GJ.

Psychol Methods. 2006 Dec;11(4):386-401.

PMID:
17154753
11.

A simple unified approach for estimating natural direct and indirect effects.

Lange T, Vansteelandt S, Bekaert M.

Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Aug 1;176(3):190-5. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr525. Epub 2012 Jul 10.

PMID:
22781427
12.
14.

Power and measures of effect size in analysis of variance with fixed versus random nested factors.

Siemer M, Joormann J.

Psychol Methods. 2003 Dec;8(4):497-517.

PMID:
14664685
15.

Robust ANCOVA using a smoother with bootstrap bagging.

Wilcox RR.

Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2009 May;62(Pt 2):427-37. doi: 10.1348/000711008X325300. Epub 2008 Jul 23.

PMID:
18652737
16.

Monotonicity of effect sizes: Questioning kappa-squared as mediation effect size measure.

Wen Z, Fan X.

Psychol Methods. 2015 Jun;20(2):193-203. doi: 10.1037/met0000029. Epub 2015 Feb 9. Review. Erratum in: Psychol Methods. 2015 Jun;20(2):ii.

PMID:
25664380
17.

Multiple trials may yield exaggerated effect size estimates.

Brand A, Bradley MT, Best LA, Stoica G.

J Gen Psychol. 2011 Jan-Mar;138(1):1-11.

PMID:
21404946
18.

Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies.

McCaffrey DF, Ridgeway G, Morral AR.

Psychol Methods. 2004 Dec;9(4):403-25.

PMID:
15598095
19.

Mediation analysis via potential outcomes models.

Albert JM.

Stat Med. 2008 Apr 15;27(8):1282-304.

PMID:
17691077
20.

Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.

Fu R, Gartlehner G, Grant M, Shamliyan T, Sedrakyan A, Wilt TJ, Griffith L, Oremus M, Raina P, Ismaila A, Santaguida P, Lau J, Trikalinos TA.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1187-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.08.010. Epub 2011 Apr 7.

PMID:
21477993

Supplemental Content

Support Center