Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 144

1.

Misoprostol vaginal insert for successful labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.

Wing DA, Miller H, Parker L, Powers BL, Rayburn WF; Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Miso-Obs-204 Investigators..

Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;117(3):533-41. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318209d669.

PMID:
21343755
2.

[Cervical Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial].

Oliveira MV, Oberst PV, Leite GK, Aguemi A, Kenj G, Leme VD, Sass N.

Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2010 Jul;32(7):346-51. Portuguese.

3.

Labor induction with 25 microg versus 50 microg intravaginal misoprostol: a systematic review.

Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Delke I.

Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jan;99(1):145-51. Review.

PMID:
11777525
4.
5.

Misoprostol dose selection in a controlled-release vaginal insert for induction of labor in nulliparous women.

Casta├▒eda CS, Izquierdo Puente JC, Leon Ochoa RA, Plasse TF, Powers BL, Rayburn WF.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep;193(3 Pt 2):1071-5.

PMID:
16157114
6.

Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction.

Garry D, Figueroa R, Kalish RB, Catalano CJ, Maulik D.

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003 Apr;13(4):254-9.

PMID:
12854927
7.
8.

Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.

Cheng SY, Ming H, Lee JC.

Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;111(1):119-25. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000297313.68644.71.

PMID:
18165400
9.

Vaginal misoprostol administration for cervical ripening and labor induction.

Wing DA, Gaffaney CA.

Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;49(3):627-41. Review.

PMID:
16885668
10.
11.
12.

Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.

Denguezli W, Trimech A, Haddad A, Hajjaji A, Saidani Z, Faleh R, Sakouhi M.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007 Aug;276(2):119-24.

PMID:
17219155
13.

Combination of Foley bulb and vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.

Carbone JF, Tuuli MG, Fogertey PJ, Roehl KA, Macones GA.

Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;121(2 Pt 1):247-52. doi: http://10.1097/AOG.0b013e31827e5dca.

PMID:
23303106
14.
15.

Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.

Hofmeyr GJ, G├╝lmezoglu AM, Alfirevic Z.

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Aug;106(8):798-803. Review.

PMID:
10453829
16.

Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone vaginal insert: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Austin SC, Sanchez-Ramos L, Adair CD.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;202(6):624.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.03.014. Epub 2010 Apr 28. Review.

PMID:
20430362
17.

Misoprostol for term labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.

Saeed GA, Fakhar S, Nisar N, Alam AY.

Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;50(1):15-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2009.08.001.

18.

Misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a delivery system with accurate dosing and rapid discontinuation.

Stephenson ML, Hawkins JS, Powers BL, Wing DA.

Womens Health (Lond). 2014 Jan;10(1):29-36. doi: 10.2217/whe.13.49. Review.

19.

A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening.

Sciscione AC, Nguyen L, Manley J, Pollock M, Maas B, Colmorgen G.

Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Apr;97(4):603-7.

PMID:
11275035
20.

Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.

Calder AA, Loughney AD, Weir CJ, Barber JW.

BJOG. 2008 Sep;115(10):1279-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01829.x.

Supplemental Content

Support Center