Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 161

1.

Is computer aided detection (CAD) cost effective in screening mammography? A model based on the CADET II study.

Guerriero C, Gillan MG, Cairns J, Wallis MG, Gilbert FJ.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jan 17;11:11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-11.

2.

Cost-effectiveness analysis for breast cancer screening: double reading versus single + CAD reading.

Sato M, Kawai M, Nishino Y, Shibuya D, Ohuchi N, Ishibashi T.

Breast Cancer. 2014 Sep;21(5):532-41. doi: 10.1007/s12282-012-0423-5. Epub 2012 Oct 27.

PMID:
23104393
3.

Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231,221 mammograms.

Gromet M.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Apr;190(4):854-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2812.

PMID:
18356428
4.

Mammographic features of breast cancers at single reading with computer-aided detection and at double reading in a large multicenter prospective trial of computer-aided detection: CADET II.

James JJ, Gilbert FJ, Wallis MG, Gillan MG, Astley SM, Boggis CR, Agbaje OF, Brentnall AR, Duffy SW.

Radiology. 2010 Aug;256(2):379-86. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091899.

PMID:
20656831
5.

Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.

Skaane P, Kshirsagar A, Stapleton S, Young K, Castellino RA.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb;188(2):377-84.

PMID:
17242245
6.

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of double reading in digital mammography screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Posso M, Puig T, Carles M, Rué M, Canelo-Aybar C, Bonfill X.

Eur J Radiol. 2017 Nov;96:40-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Sep 21. Review.

PMID:
29103474
7.

Early detection of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on computer-aided detection in mammography screening.

Houssami N, Given-Wilson R, Ciatto S.

J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2009 Apr;53(2):171-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02062.x. Review.

PMID:
19527363
8.

Invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography: a detailed comparison of computer-aided detection-assisted single reading and double reading.

Cawson JN, Nickson C, Amos A, Hill G, Whan AB, Kavanagh AM.

J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2009 Oct;53(5):442-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02100.x.

PMID:
19788479
9.

Double versus single reading of mammograms in a breast cancer screening programme: a cost-consequence analysis.

Posso MC, Puig T, Quintana MJ, Solà-Roca J, Bonfill X.

Eur Radiol. 2016 Sep;26(9):3262-71. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4175-4. Epub 2016 Jan 8.

PMID:
26747264
10.

Single reading with computer-aided detection and double reading of screening mammograms in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Program.

Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, McGee MA, Gillan MG, Boggis CR, Griffiths PM, Duffy SW.

Radiology. 2006 Oct;241(1):47-53.

PMID:
16990670
11.

Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study.

Khoo LA, Taylor P, Given-Wilson RM.

Radiology. 2005 Nov;237(2):444-9.

PMID:
16244252
12.

Mammography screening using independent double reading with consensus: is there a potential benefit for computer-aided detection?

Skaane P, Kshirsagar A, Hofvind S, Jahr G, Castellino RA.

Acta Radiol. 2012 Apr 1;53(3):241-8. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.110452. Epub 2012 Jan 27.

PMID:
22287148
13.

Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography.

Georgian-Smith D, Moore RH, Halpern E, Yeh ED, Rafferty EA, D'Alessandro HA, Staffa M, Hall DA, McCarthy KA, Kopans DB.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Nov;189(5):1135-41.

PMID:
17954651
14.
15.

Computer-aided detection for computed tomographic colonography screening: a prospective comparison of a double-reading paradigm with first-reader computer-aided detection against second-reader computer-aided detection.

Iussich G, Correale L, Senore C, Hassan C, Segnan N, Campanella D, Bert A, Galatola G, Laudi C, Regge D.

Invest Radiol. 2014 Mar;49(3):173-82. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000009.

16.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.

Lehman CD, Wellman RD, Buist DS, Kerlikowske K, Tosteson AN, Miglioretti DL; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Nov;175(11):1828-37. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5231.

17.

Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography.

Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Gillan MG, Agbaje OF, Wallis MG, James J, Boggis CR, Duffy SW; CADET II Group.

N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 16;359(16):1675-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0803545. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

18.

Does computer-aided detection have a role in the arbitration of discordant double-reading opinions in a breast-screening programme?

James JJ, Cornford EJ.

Clin Radiol. 2009 Jan;64(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Sep 4.

PMID:
19070697
19.
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center