Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 101

1.

Assessment of the Need to Update Comparative Effectiveness Reviews: Report of an Initial Rapid Program Assessment (2005–2009) [Internet].

Shekelle P, Newberry S, Maglione M, Shanman R, Johnsen B, Carter J, Motala A, Hulley B, Wang Z, Bravata D, Chen M, Grossman J.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2009 Sep 10.

2.

Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet].

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008-.

3.

Comparing Medical Interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.

Slutsky J, Atkins D, Chang S, Collins Sharp BA.

Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008-.
2008 Nov 18.

4.

Surveillance and Identification of Signals for Updating Systematic Reviews: Implementation and Early Experience [Internet].

Newberry SJ, Ahmadzai N, Motala A, Tsertsvadze A, Maglione M, Ansari MT, Hempel S, Tsouros S, Schneider Chafen J, Shanman R, Skidmore B, Moher D, Shekelle PG.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2013 Jun.

5.

Assessment of a Method to Detect Signals for Updating Systematic Reviews [Internet].

Shekelle PG, Motala A, Johnsen B.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014 Mar.

6.

Developing and Selecting Topic Nominations for Systematic Reviews.

Eder M, Feightner A, Webber E, Guirguis-Blake J, Whitlock EP.

Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008-.
2012 Nov 19.

7.

Peer Review of Search Strategies [Internet].

Relevo R, Paynter R.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Jun.

8.

Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews [Internet].

Chang SM, Matchar DB, Smetana GW, Umscheid CA, editors.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Jun.

10.

[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25. German.

PMID:
19034813
11.

Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.

PMID:
18987905
12.

Assessment of a method to detect signals for updating systematic reviews.

Shekelle PG, Motala A, Johnsen B, Newberry SJ.

Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 14;3:13. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-13. Erratum in: Syst Rev. 2014;3:22.

13.

Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing Health Care Interventions for the Effective Health Care Program of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: An Update.

Berkman ND, Lohr KN, Ansari M, McDonagh M, Balk E, Whitlock E, Reston J, Bass E, Butler M, Gartlehner G, Hartling L, Kane R, McPheeters M, Morgan L, Morton SC, Viswanathan M, Sista P, Chang S.

Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008-.
2013 Nov 18.

14.
15.

Updating Systematic Reviews.

Shojania KG, Sampson M, Ansari MT, Ji J, Garritty C, Rader T, Moher D.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2007 Sep.

16.

AHRQ series paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.

Whitlock EP, Lopez SA, Chang S, Helfand M, Eder M, Floyd N.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):491-501. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Jun 21.

PMID:
19540721
17.

Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions.

Viswanathan M, Ansari MT, Berkman ND, Chang S, Hartling L, McPheeters M, Santaguida PL, Shamliyan T, Singh K, Tsertsvadze A, Treadwell JR.

Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008-.
2012 Mar 8.

18.

AHRQ series paper 1: comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.

Slutsky J, Atkins D, Chang S, Sharp BA.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):481-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.009. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

PMID:
18834715
19.

Evidence Brief: The Effectiveness Of Mandatory Computer-Based Trainings On Government Ethics, Workplace Harassment, Or Privacy And Information Security-Related Topics.

Peterson K, McCleery E.

VA Evidence-based Synthesis Program Evidence Briefs [Internet]. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2011-.
2014 May.

20.

Identifying, Selecting, and Refining Topics.

Whitlock EP, Lopez SA, Chang S, Helfand M, Eder M, Floyd N.

Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008-.
2009 Apr 27.

Supplemental Content

Support Center