Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 68

1.

Rewiring of genetic networks in response to DNA damage.

Bandyopadhyay S, Mehta M, Kuo D, Sung MK, Chuang R, Jaehnig EJ, Bodenmiller B, Licon K, Copeland W, Shales M, Fiedler D, Dutkowski J, Guénolé A, van Attikum H, Shokat KM, Kolodner RD, Huh WK, Aebersold R, Keogh MC, Krogan NJ, Ideker T.

Science. 2010 Dec 3;330(6009):1385-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1195618. Erratum in: Science. 2011 Jan 21;331(6015):284.

2.

Genetics. The DNA damage road map.

Friedman N, Schuldiner M.

Science. 2010 Dec 3;330(6009):1327-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1199862. No abstract available.

PMID:
21127235
3.

Dissection of DNA damage responses using multiconditional genetic interaction maps.

Guénolé A, Srivas R, Vreeken K, Wang ZZ, Wang S, Krogan NJ, Ideker T, van Attikum H.

Mol Cell. 2013 Jan 24;49(2):346-58. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.11.023. Epub 2012 Dec 27.

4.

The protein factor-arrest 11 (Far11) is essential for the toxicity of human caspase-10 in yeast and participates in the regulation of autophagy and the DNA damage signaling.

Lisa-Santamaría P, Jiménez A, Revuelta JL.

J Biol Chem. 2012 Aug 24;287(35):29636-47. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.344192. Epub 2012 Jul 10.

5.

DNA repair: tails of histones lost.

Nussenzweig A, Paull T.

Nature. 2006 Jan 26;439(7075):406-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
16437102
6.

Genetic interactions between protein phosphatases CaPtc2p and CaPph3p in response to genotoxins and rapamycin in Candida albicans.

Feng J, Zhao Y, Duan Y, Jiang L.

FEMS Yeast Res. 2013 Feb;13(1):85-96. doi: 10.1111/1567-1364.12012. Epub 2012 Nov 19.

7.

A global protein kinase and phosphatase interaction network in yeast.

Breitkreutz A, Choi H, Sharom JR, Boucher L, Neduva V, Larsen B, Lin ZY, Breitkreutz BJ, Stark C, Liu G, Ahn J, Dewar-Darch D, Reguly T, Tang X, Almeida R, Qin ZS, Pawson T, Gingras AC, Nesvizhskii AI, Tyers M.

Science. 2010 May 21;328(5981):1043-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1176495.

8.

The preference for error-free or error-prone postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to low-dose methyl methanesulfonate is cell cycle dependent.

Huang D, Piening BD, Paulovich AG.

Mol Cell Biol. 2013 Apr;33(8):1515-27. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01392-12. Epub 2013 Feb 4.

9.

A phosphatase complex that dephosphorylates gammaH2AX regulates DNA damage checkpoint recovery.

Keogh MC, Kim JA, Downey M, Fillingham J, Chowdhury D, Harrison JC, Onishi M, Datta N, Galicia S, Emili A, Lieberman J, Shen X, Buratowski S, Haber JE, Durocher D, Greenblatt JF, Krogan NJ.

Nature. 2006 Jan 26;439(7075):497-501. Epub 2005 Nov 20.

PMID:
16299494
10.

Histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation and the response to DNA replication fork damage.

Wurtele H, Kaiser GS, Bacal J, St-Hilaire E, Lee EH, Tsao S, Dorn J, Maddox P, Lisby M, Pasero P, Verreault A.

Mol Cell Biol. 2012 Jan;32(1):154-72. doi: 10.1128/MCB.05415-11. Epub 2011 Oct 24.

11.

Yap1: a DNA damage responder in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Rowe LA, Degtyareva N, Doetsch PW.

Mech Ageing Dev. 2012 Apr;133(4):147-56. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 Mar 17.

12.

Protein phosphatase Pph3 and its regulatory subunit Psy2 regulate Rad53 dephosphorylation and cell morphogenesis during recovery from DNA damage in Candida albicans.

Sun LL, Li WJ, Wang HT, Chen J, Deng P, Wang Y, Sang JL.

Eukaryot Cell. 2011 Nov;10(11):1565-73. doi: 10.1128/EC.05042-11. Epub 2011 Sep 2.

13.

Regulation of NuA4 histone acetyltransferase activity in transcription and DNA repair by phosphorylation of histone H4.

Utley RT, Lacoste N, Jobin-Robitaille O, Allard S, Côté J.

Mol Cell Biol. 2005 Sep;25(18):8179-90.

14.

Genetic alterations leading to increases in internal potassium concentrations are detrimental for DNA integrity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Merchan S, Pedelini L, Hueso G, Calzada A, Serrano R, Yenush L.

Genes Cells. 2011 Feb;16(2):152-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2010.01472.x. Epub 2010 Dec 9.

15.

Identification of response-modulated genetic interactions by sensitivity-based epistatic analysis.

Batenchuk C, Tepliakova L, Kaern M.

BMC Genomics. 2010 Sep 10;11:493. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-493.

16.

[The Rdh54 protein role in regulation of DNA repair in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae].

Latypov VF, Kozhina TN, Kozhin SA, Korolev VG.

Genetika. 2010 Feb;46(2):194-202. Russian.

PMID:
20297653
17.

Proteasome inhibition enhances resistance to DNA damage via upregulation of Rpn4-dependent DNA repair genes.

Karpov DS, Spasskaya DS, Tutyaeva VV, Mironov AS, Karpov VL.

FEBS Lett. 2013 Sep 17;587(18):3108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.08.007. Epub 2013 Aug 13.

18.

Novel functional residues in the core domain of histone H2B regulate yeast gene expression and silencing and affect the response to DNA damage.

Kyriss MN, Jin Y, Gallegos IJ, Sanford JA, Wyrick JJ.

Mol Cell Biol. 2010 Jul;30(14):3503-18. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00290-10. Epub 2010 May 17.

Supplemental Content

Support Center