Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 101

1.

A novel bioreactor for the dynamic stimulation and mechanical evaluation of multiple tissue-engineered constructs.

Lujan TJ, Wirtz KM, Bahney CS, Madey SM, Johnstone B, Bottlang M.

Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2011 Mar;17(3):367-74. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2010.0381.

2.

Real-time monitoring of force response measured in mechanically stimulated tissue-engineered cartilage.

Preiss-Bloom O, Mizrahi J, Elisseeff J, Seliktar D.

Artif Organs. 2009 Apr;33(4):318-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2009.00723.x.

PMID:
19335408
3.

Dynamic compressive loading influences degradation behavior of PEG-PLA hydrogels.

Nicodemus GD, Shiplet KA, Kaltz SR, Bryant SJ.

Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009 Feb 15;102(3):948-59. doi: 10.1002/bit.22105.

PMID:
18831003
4.

The design and development of a high-throughput magneto-mechanostimulation device for cartilage tissue engineering.

Brady MA, Vaze R, Amin HD, Overby DR, Ethier CR.

Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2014 Feb;20(2):149-59. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2013.0225.

5.

Effect of a mechanical stimulation bioreactor on tissue engineered, scaffold-free cartilage.

Tran SC, Cooley AJ, Elder SH.

Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011 Jun;108(6):1421-9. doi: 10.1002/bit.23061.

PMID:
21274847
6.

Mechanobioreactors for Cartilage Tissue Engineering.

Weber JF, Perez R, Waldman SD.

Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1340:203-19. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2938-2_15.

PMID:
26445841
8.

A novel axial-stress bioreactor system combined with a substance exchanger for tissue engineering of 3D constructs.

Li ST, Liu Y, Zhou Q, Lue RF, Song L, Dong SW, Guo P, Kopjar B.

Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2014 Mar;20(3):205-14. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2013.0173.

PMID:
23822092
9.

Three-dimensional-construct bioreactor conditioning in human tendon tissue engineering.

Woon CY, Kraus A, Raghavan SS, Pridgen BC, Megerle K, Pham H, Chang J.

Tissue Eng Part A. 2011 Oct;17(19-20):2561-72. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0701.

PMID:
21612572
10.

Long-term culture of tissue engineered cartilage in a perfused chamber with mechanical stimulation.

Seidel JO, Pei M, Gray ML, Langer R, Freed LE, Vunjak-Novakovic G.

Biorheology. 2004;41(3-4):445-58.

PMID:
15299276
11.

Dynamic regulation of bone morphogenetic proteins in engineered osteochondral constructs by biomechanical stimulation.

Nam J, Perera P, Rath B, Agarwal S.

Tissue Eng Part A. 2013 Mar;19(5-6):783-92. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0103.

12.

Generation of mechanical and biofunctional gradients in PEG diacrylate hydrogels by perfusion-based frontal photopolymerization.

Turturro MV, Papavasiliou G.

J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2012;23(7):917-39. doi: 10.1163/092050611X566450.

PMID:
21477459
13.

Mechanical testing of hydrogels in cartilage tissue engineering: beyond the compressive modulus.

Xiao Y, Friis EA, Gehrke SH, Detamore MS.

Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2013 Oct;19(5):403-12. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2012.0461. Review.

14.

A novel bioreactor for the generation of highly aligned 3D skeletal muscle-like constructs through orientation of fibrin via application of static strain.

Heher P, Maleiner B, Prüller J, Teuschl AH, Kollmitzer J, Monforte X, Wolbank S, Redl H, Rünzler D, Fuchs C.

Acta Biomater. 2015 Sep;24:251-65. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.06.033.

PMID:
26141153
15.

Design and performance of an optically accessible, low-volume, mechanobioreactor for long-term study of living constructs.

Paten JA, Zareian R, Saeidi N, Melotti SA, Ruberti JW.

Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2011 Jul;17(7):775-88. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2010.0642.

16.

Evaluation of the growth environment of a hydrostatic force bioreactor for preconditioning of tissue-engineered constructs.

Reinwald Y, Leonard KH, Henstock JR, Whiteley JP, Osborne JM, Waters SL, Levesque P, El Haj AJ.

Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2015 Jan;21(1):1-14. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2013.0476.

17.

Comparative study of the viscoelastic mechanical behavior of agarose and poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels.

Roberts JJ, Earnshaw A, Ferguson VL, Bryant SJ.

J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2011 Oct;99(1):158-69. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31883.

PMID:
21714081
18.

Comparison of photopolymerizable thiol-ene PEG and acrylate-based PEG hydrogels for cartilage development.

Roberts JJ, Bryant SJ.

Biomaterials. 2013 Dec;34(38):9969-79. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.020.

19.

Culturing functional cartilage tissue under a novel bionic mechanical condition.

Sun M, Lv D, Zhang C, Zhu L.

Med Hypotheses. 2010 Dec;75(6):657-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2010.08.011.

PMID:
20800365
20.

Squeeze pressure bioreactor: a hydrodynamic bioreactor for noncontact stimulation of cartilage constructs.

De Maria C, Giusti S, Mazzei D, Crawford A, Ahluwalia A.

Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2011 Jul;17(7):757-64. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2011.0002.

PMID:
21410315
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center