Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 175

1.

Patients' and cardiologists' perceptions of the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary disease.

Rothberg MB, Sivalingam SK, Ashraf J, Visintainer P, Joelson J, Kleppel R, Vallurupalli N, Schweiger MJ.

Ann Intern Med. 2010 Sep 7;153(5):307-13. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-5-201009070-00005.

PMID:
20820040
2.

Summaries for patients. Patients' and cardiologists' beliefs about a common heart procedure.

[No authors listed]

Ann Intern Med. 2010 Sep 7;153(5):I46. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-5-201009070-00001. No abstract available.

PMID:
20820035
3.

The effect of information presentation on beliefs about the benefits of elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

Rothberg MB, Scherer L, Kashef MA, Coylewright M, Ting HH, Hu B, Zikmund-Fisher BJ.

JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Oct;174(10):1623-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3331.

PMID:
25156687
4.

Cardiologists' use of percutaneous coronary interventions for stable coronary artery disease.

Lin GA, Dudley RA, Redberg RF.

Arch Intern Med. 2007 Aug 13-27;167(15):1604-9.

PMID:
17698682
5.

Patients' and cardiologists' perceptions of the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary disease.

Schenker Y, Meisel A.

Ann Intern Med. 2011 Mar 1;154(5):371. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-5-201103010-00015. No abstract available.

PMID:
21357917
6.

Patients overestimate the potential benefits of elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

Lee JH, Chuu K, Spertus J, Cohen DJ, James AG, Tang F, O'Keefe JH.

Mo Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;109(1):79-84.

PMID:
22428453
7.

Do differences in repeat revascularization explain the antianginal benefits of bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention?: implications for future treatment comparisons.

Arnold SV, Magnuson EA, Wang K, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, Mohr FW, Cohen DJ; SYNTAX Investigators.

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 May;5(3):267-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.964585. Epub 2012 Apr 10.

8.

Why physicians favor use of percutaneous coronary intervention to medical therapy: a focus group study.

Lin GA, Dudley RA, Redberg RF.

J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Sep;23(9):1458-63. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0706-x. Epub 2008 Jul 10.

9.

Persistent angina: the Araba Phoenix of cardiology.

Marzilli M, Huqi A, Morrone D.

Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2010;10 Suppl 1:27-32. doi: 10.2165/1153643-S0-000000000-00000.

PMID:
21391731
10.

Initial coronary stent implantation with medical therapy vs medical therapy alone for stable coronary artery disease: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Stergiopoulos K, Brown DL.

Arch Intern Med. 2012 Feb 27;172(4):312-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1484.

PMID:
22371919
11.

How cardiologists present the benefits of percutaneous coronary interventions to patients with stable angina: a qualitative analysis.

Goff SL, Mazor KM, Ting HH, Kleppel R, Rothberg MB.

JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Oct;174(10):1614-21. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3328.

12.

Angina 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the NHLBI Dynamic Registry.

Holubkov R, Laskey WK, Haviland A, Slater JC, Bourassa MG, Vlachos HA, Cohen HA, Williams DO, Kelsey SF, Detre KM; NHLBI Dynamic Registry. Registry Investigators.

Am Heart J. 2002 Nov;144(5):826-33.

PMID:
12422151
13.

Meta-analysis: effects of percutaneous coronary intervention versus medical therapy on angina relief.

Wijeysundera HC, Nallamothu BK, Krumholz HM, Tu JV, Ko DT.

Ann Intern Med. 2010 Mar 16;152(6):370-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-6-201003160-00007.

PMID:
20231568
14.
16.

Clinical implications of the BARI 2D and COURAGE trials: the evolving role of percutaneous coronary intervention.

Holper EM, Addo T.

Coron Artery Dis. 2010 Nov;21(7):397-401. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e32833d0134. Review.

PMID:
20634692
17.

[Patients facing with the decision to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention].

Bobbio M.

Recenti Prog Med. 2015 Mar;106(3):113-7. doi: 10.1701/1806.19698. Italian.

PMID:
25805221
18.

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus conservative therapy in nonacute coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Katritsis DG, Ioannidis JP.

Circulation. 2005 Jun 7;111(22):2906-12. Epub 2005 May 31.

19.

Percutaneous angioplasty of chronically occluded coronary arteries: long-term clinical follow-up.

Drozd J, Wójcik J, Opalińska E, Zapolski T, Widomska-Czekajska T.

Kardiol Pol. 2006 Jul;64(7):667-73; discussion 674.

20.

Prevalence and prognostic significance of preprocedural cardiac troponin elevation among patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the evaluation of drug eluting stents and ischemic events registry.

Jeremias A, Kleiman NS, Nassif D, Hsieh WH, Pencina M, Maresh K, Parikh M, Cutlip DE, Waksman R, Goldberg S, Berger PB, Cohen DJ; Evaluation of Drug Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events (EVENT) Registry Investigators.

Circulation. 2008 Aug 5;118(6):632-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.752428. Epub 2008 Jul 21.

Supplemental Content

Support Center