Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 103

1.

Virtue or pretense? Looking behind self-declared innocence in doping.

Petróczi A, Aidman EV, Hussain I, Deshmukh N, Nepusz T, Uvacsek M, Tóth M, Barker J, Naughton DP.

PLoS One. 2010 May 5;5(5):e10457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010457.

2.

Incongruence in doping related attitudes, beliefs and opinions in the context of discordant behavioural data: in which measure do we trust?

Petróczi A, Uvacsek M, Nepusz T, Deshmukh N, Shah I, Aidman EV, Barker J, Tóth M, Naughton DP.

PLoS One. 2011 Apr 26;6(4):e18804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018804.

3.

Psychological and social correlates of doping attitudes among Italian athletes.

Zucchetti G, Candela F, Villosio C.

Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Feb;26(2):162-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.07.021.

PMID:
25168080
4.

Capturing doping attitudes by self-report declarations and implicit assessment: a methodology study.

Petróczi A, Aidman EV, Nepusz T.

Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2008 Apr 21;3:9. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-3-9.

5.

Illegal performance enhancing drugs and doping in sport: a picture-based brief implicit association test for measuring athletes' attitudes.

Brand R, Heck P, Ziegler M.

Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2014 Jan 30;9:7. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-9-7.

6.

Self-admitted behavior and perceived use of performance-enhancing vs psychoactive drugs among competitive athletes.

Uvacsek M, Nepusz T, Naughton DP, Mazanov J, Ránky MZ, Petróczi A.

Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011 Apr;21(2):224-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01041.x.

PMID:
19903314
7.
9.

Self-reported attitudes of elite athletes towards doping: differences between type of sport.

Alaranta A, Alaranta H, Holmila J, Palmu P, Pietilä K, Helenius I.

Int J Sports Med. 2006 Oct;27(10):842-6.

PMID:
16586338
10.

Using response-time latencies to measure athletes' doping attitudes: the brief implicit attitude test identifies substance abuse in bodybuilders.

Brand R, Wolff W, Thieme D.

Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2014 Sep 10;9:36. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-9-36.

11.

A call for policy guidance on psychometric testing in doping control in sport.

Petróczi A, Backhouse SH, Barkoukis V, Brand R, Elbe AM, Lazuras L, Lucidi F.

Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Nov;26(11):1130-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.04.022.

PMID:
26094122
12.

Using the prototype willingness model to predict doping in sport.

Whitaker L, Long J, Petróczi A, Backhouse SH.

Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Oct;24(5):e398-405.

PMID:
25371934
13.

Inside athletes' minds: preliminary results from a pilot study on mental representation of doping and potential implications for anti-doping.

Petróczi A, Mazanov J, Naughton DP.

Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2011 May 20;6:10. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-6-10.

14.

Clean Olympians? Doping and anti-doping: the views of talented young British athletes.

Bloodworth A, McNamee M.

Int J Drug Policy. 2010 Jul;21(4):276-82. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.11.009.

PMID:
20056401
15.

Doping knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Ugandan athletes': a cross-sectional study.

Muwonge H, Zavuga R, Kabenge PA.

Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2015 Sep 22;10:37. doi: 10.1186/s13011-015-0033-2.

16.

Self-determined motivation in sport predicts anti-doping motivation and intention: a perspective from the trans-contextual model.

Chan DK, Dimmock JA, Donovan RJ, Hardcastle S, Lentillon-Kaestner V, Hagger MS.

J Sci Med Sport. 2015 May;18(3):315-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.04.001.

PMID:
24793786
17.

Self-control, self-regulation, and doping in sport: a test of the strength-energy model.

Chan DK, Lentillon-Kaestner V, Dimmock JA, Donovan RJ, Keatley DA, Hardcastle SJ, Hagger MS.

J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2015 Apr;37(2):199-206. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2014-0250.

PMID:
25996110
18.

Gateway to doping? Supplement use in the context of preferred competitive situations, doping attitude, beliefs, and norms.

Backhouse SH, Whitaker L, Petróczi A.

Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013 Mar;23(2):244-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01374.x.

PMID:
22092778
19.

An examination of the Sport Drug Control Model with elite Australian athletes.

Gucciardi DF, Jalleh G, Donovan RJ.

J Sci Med Sport. 2011 Nov;14(6):469-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.03.009.

PMID:
21514883
20.

Is there a danger for myopia in anti-doping education? Comparative analysis of substance use and misuse in Olympic racket sports calls for a broader approach.

Kondric M, Sekulic D, Petroczi A, Ostojic L, Rodek J, Ostojic Z.

Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2011 Oct 11;6:27. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-6-27.

Supplemental Content

Support Center